Jump to content

~~ PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! || Millions of Impeaches, Impeaches for Me || House Impeachment Hearings OT ~~


Recommended Posts

Why do we care about there even being a quid pro quo? Solicitation alone is illegal. Trump is done in a legal sense. The rest is politics.

 

But a quid pro quo isn't even necessary. Solicitation is enough guys. Also there has clearly been quid pro quo so . . . 

 

But I'm really tired no one is mentioning the solicitation, which is irrefutable at this point and just as illegal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Growing number of GOP senators consider acknowledging Trump’s quid pro quo on Ukraine

 

Quote

A growing number of Senate Republicans are ready to acknowledge that President Trump used U.S. military aid as leverage to force Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his family as the president repeatedly denies a quid pro quo.

 

In this shift in strategy to defend Trump, these Republicans are insisting that the president’s action was not illegal and does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense as the Democratic-led House moves forward with the open phase of its probe.

 

But the shift among Senate Republicans could complicate the message coming from Trump as he furiously fights the claim that he had withheld U.S. aid from Ukraine to pressure it to dig up dirt on a political rival, even as an increasing number of Republicans wonder how long they can continue to argue that no quid pro quo was at play in the matter. 

 

It's kind of amazing to me that you can go from, "No quid pro quo," to, "Well there was but it's OK." Not that we haven't seen them do that, but why would you even take someone seriously who shifts goal posts that hard, especially when simply asking for a foreign government to investigate a political rival is wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sondland acknowledges 'quid pro quo' in revision to Trump-Ukraine testimony.

 

Posted from Zerohedge because Zerohedge is generally brazenly pro-Trump, so seeing this on its newsfeed means even Trump boosters are having trouble spinning this one.  The article also has transcripts embedded in it.

 

Read the comments at your own risk.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Signifyin(g)Monkey said:

Sondland acknowledges 'quid pro quo' in revision to Trump-Ukraine testimony.

 

Posted from Zerohedge because Zerohedge is generally brazenly pro-Trump, so seeing this on its newsfeed means even Trump boosters are having trouble spinning this one.  The article also has transcripts embedded in it.

 

Read the comments at your own risk.

 

Just now, PaladinSolo said:

Ohh that quid pro quo, yeah we totally did that, also gave up pence, lol. 

 

 

 

:feelsgood:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...