Comet Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Honest question, why are any of these documents even printable in 2022? Access control goes out the window once something goes from digital to papers 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreePi Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 You say "idiot proof" but does that include Trump's special brand of idiocy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Can you imagine 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsida Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, Ricofoley said: Can you imagine This is like 4D chess stuff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, Comet said: Honest question, why are any of these documents even printable in 2022? Access control goes out the window once something goes from digital to papers It's a combination of interoperability and security for the transfer of data between different systems and sometimes there is legitimately more security involved in the handling of physical copies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_MH Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, Comet said: Honest question, why are any of these documents even printable in 2022? Access control goes out the window once something goes from digital to papers Depends on the controls in place. Sometimes I deal with classified documents and the military almost always delivers them in paper and they're only allowed to be read in our SCIF and when they are digital, they're only allowed to be viewed on these obnoxiously locked down laptops in their own private network and no wireless and glued up USB ports within the SCIF. There's a full paper trail of everything everyone reads and accesses as documented by security. Sometimes this stuff is so sensitive that even the appearance of a quick digital copy is too much of a risk. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 God, I hope those sources who talked to Washington Post are mistaken because that's a frightening prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 33 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: I'll echo this as well. Classified markings practically SCREAM to anyone their level of classification and associated caveats because they are fully intended to be "idiot proof" so that no one can plausibly deny that they were unaware of the exact nature of the sensitivity of the documents in their possession. The only theoretically plausible excuse would involve something known as "derivative classification" which involves "deriving" a new document from a source or sources that have an varying degrees of original classification. But even then, there ain't much ground to stand on in that case either. Even in the Navy when I was going through A-school, we had to stamp in all of our homework in beg red letters as "NOFORN" (No foreign nationals) and have it locked up when not in the school house. The government doesn't mess around with classified information/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhyteboar Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Chicanery. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Ok I might of lied about seeing comments on the FoxNews site some die hards still but the tides might be slowly turning over there. Some are even complaining that Fox isn’t even reporting the news of this literal nuclear bombshell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, silentbob said: Ok I might of lied about seeing comments on the FoxNews site some die hards still but the tides might be slowly turning over there. Some are even complaining that Fox isn’t even reporting the news of this literal nuclear bombshell This is a typical pattern. Even his rightwing allies are sometimes knocked off balance for a few days when the worst stuff comes out. Well within a week they will have their talking points in order and connecting the dots to how it's all actually Hillary's fault. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 hour ago, CastlevaniaNut18 said: You should fix that, ASAP. It's one of those always on my list. I didn't have access to HBO back when such shows ran, and I've slowly watched some of those golden era HBO series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsida Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 The news is saying a president does not have the authority to unilaterally declassify material on nuclear energy or weapons per the Atomic Energy Act. So that pretty much cuts off Trumps possible defense that he declassified the docs before leaving office. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 So Nuclear documents… at what point does Murdoch and the rest of the FOX idiots have their “Joker” moment of clarity where they are shit heads but Patriotic shitheads? Just kidding, we know theyre in it to the bitter end 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_MH Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 minute ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: He's likely correct in that Trump kept them, not to sell, but because he thought it was cool and something he could brag about. I can very easily picture him bragging on the golf course that all the US nuclear secrets are locked up in a safe under his desk. What's most troubling is that he's also the type to pull out a few docs for VIP guests while also bragging about how secure and well built the safe is. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 4 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said: He's likely correct in that Trump kept them, not to sell, but because he thought it was cool and something he could brag about. I can very easily picture him bragging on the golf course that all the US nuclear secrets are locked up in a safe under his desk. What's most troubling is that he's also the type to pull out a few docs for VIP guests while also bragging about how secure and well built the safe is. With his stupid thumb up and that shit eating grin on his face and a red maga hat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Wouldn’t it be something if it turns out the mole was the recently deceased IVANKA, IVANKA WAS THE MOLE!!! I say this because I recently heard that only The Mafia pleads the 5th, and I saw this news story . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 14 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: "Was it illegal for Donald Trump to sell nuclear secrets to Saudi Arabia for 500 million in personal profit? Experts argue the answer is more complicated than you might think." Or.... "Will Democrats face backlash in November for exposing Donald Trump's impropriety" 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, Chairslinger said: "Was it illegal for Donald Trump to sell nuclear secrets to Saudi Arabia for 500 million in personal profit? Experts argue the answer is more complicated than you might think." Or.... "Will Democrats face backlash in November for exposing Donald Trump's impropriety" 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSpreader Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 7 minutes ago, Chairslinger said: "Was it illegal for Donald Trump to sell nuclear secrets to Saudi Arabia for 500 million in personal profit? Experts argue the answer is more complicated than you might think." Or.... "Will Democrats face backlash in November for exposing Donald Trump's impropriety" Now's not the time to divide our country Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 Pathetic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 minute ago, SuperSpreader said: Now's not the time to divide our country With so many new nations becoming nascent nuclear powers the threat is too great for the United States to waste time pointing fingers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal-El814 Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 8 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Pathetic In this biz we call this, "pulling an Alex Jones," and reader, it sucks shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedarkstark Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 11 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Pathetic Kudos are in order for the unfathomable task of making Laura Ingraham appear as the "good & reasonable" person in a conversation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 47 minutes ago, Chairslinger said: This is a typical pattern. Even his rightwing allies are sometimes knocked off balance for a few days when the worst stuff comes out. And you can rely on the Democrats to not strike while the iron is hot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 12, 2022 Author Share Posted August 12, 2022 Dems don’t need to say a fucking thing 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsida Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 21 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Pathetic Isn’t she in trouble if she were reviewing nuclear secrets, even for a client? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Dems don’t need to say a fucking thing Yup. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhyteboar Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Spoiler 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jwheel86 Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 1 hour ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Pathetic Unless she's got a clearance isn't her reading classified documents illegal? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarSolo Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 Oh, Trump is full defiant mode, you love to see it: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air_Delivery Posted August 12, 2022 Share Posted August 12, 2022 7 minutes ago, MarSolo said: Oh, Trump is full defiant mode, you love to see it: I'll believe it when I see it. I still think he is going oppose it because its easier to spread his bullshit in an absence of information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.