Jump to content

Target reduces 2slgbtq+ merchandise ahead of Pride month after harassment and violence from the right wing


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, sblfilms said:

As a general rule, businesses try to grow their sales by appealing to many different demographics, even when they have a primary demographic they attempt to cater to most. Pandering seems like an odd choice unless you believe all moves businesses make to appeal to smaller market segments is pandering…which kinda makes it pointless to call out.

 

Thinking about it, 7% of Americans are queer. I wonder what the threshold is for anyone that thinks selling pride gear is pandering. 2% of Americans are Jewish, so that's definitely pandering. 3% of Americans own reptiles, so Target must be pandering since they carry reptile food and lamps. 5% of Americans are 4 and under...is selling children's clothes also pandering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2023 at 12:06 PM, mclumber1 said:

Were these types of initiatives by Target and other retailers at all profitable?  Can a company be inviting/accepting to groups of downcast groups of people without "pandering"?  

 

I've seen better word choice, can't lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Kal-El814 said:

 

I've seen better word choice, can't lie.

 

?  Not sure what you are getting at.  My point is that LGTBs are being unfairly marginalized and harassed.  

 

Somewhat related: I was speaking with someone the other day who was really upset that Target would sell this clothing in their stores, and my response to them was, "Then don't that clothing, no one is forcing you to do so."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

?  Not sure what you are getting at.  My point is that LGTBs are being unfairly marginalized and harassed.


I’m guessing the word you were actually thinking of was “downtrodden”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ghost_MH said:

 

Thinking about it, 7% of Americans are queer. I wonder what the threshold is for anyone that thinks selling pride gear is pandering. 2% of Americans are Jewish, so that's definitely pandering. 3% of Americans own reptiles, so Target must be pandering since they carry reptile food and lamps. 5% of Americans are 4 and under...is selling children's clothes also pandering?

 

I would guess the percentage of queer people is closer to 20%, if you include all non-binary/gender-non-conforming people. National polls show Gen Z as identifying as queer in this 20% range. Anecdotally, our school division (student pop of 12,000) K-12 also does demographic polls on a variety of things (including sexuality, identification, etc), and we get that 20%-ish figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to remember "queer" can mean anything. It can even mean what we used to call bi-curious. There's certainly how I would have labeled myself, at least until recently.

 

You know how the amount of left-handed people shot up as soon as we stopped stigmatizing left-handed people? It's probably a similar effect. A lot of people are more comfortable not identifying as 'straight,' whatever that means for them. Whether that means questioning their own identity or who they are attracted to. The fact that there isn't as much stigma around it (in civilized places) inevitably means we'll see more of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mclumber1 said:

 

?  Not sure what you are getting at.  My point is that LGTBs are being unfairly marginalized and harassed.  

 

 

5 hours ago, sblfilms said:


I’m guessing the word you were actually thinking of was “downtrodden”.

 

That's the one!

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2023 at 1:07 AM, Fizzzzle said:

Most people I know just use "queer." It is sort of an all encompassing term. Some gay people don't like using it (especially older folks), but almost every person I know that has an identity that is something other than straight cis is happy with the term queer.

 

Like I don't think I know anyone personally who consider themselves a trans male, they prefer GNC (gender-non-conforming), but they're also happy with queer.

 

We live in a post-gender world, people, and there isn't really anything anyone can do about it, no matter how hard they try.


See, I’m not so sure we are, which is partly what this ruckus is about. (definitely not entirely, though, because a lot of it is just the usual GOP culture war tactics and right-wing trolling)

 

We’re definitely in a world which is more accepting of alternative sexualities.  But the idea that as a consequence of not caring who you want to sleep with or marry, we can dispense with gender altogether, is by no means as universally accepted, even by many gays and lesbians. (old AND young). Especially when things like, for example, the celebration of masculinity, is still an integral part of gay male subculture, and facing the trials of womanhood still defines what it means to be lesbian for many lesbian women.

 

This is why, I think, polls show that most Americans do not support laws that explicitly target trans people, but also show that a majority do not necessarily support, say, trans women playing in women’s sports.  That’s an indication that gender still has meaning for most people.

 

Part of what’s causing friction here is that many trans people believe asserting that gender exists implies that the trans identity does not exist.  That they don’t exist.  I don’t think that’s necessarily the case, and there are plenty of people who are willing to accept the existence and validity of gender AND the validity of a *trans*-gender, or the idea that for some individuals gender is more fluid than it is for others—and I think the trans community could benefit from enlisting them as allies.  However, it’s not a settled matter, and a fairly crucial one, so at the very least it would be nice to be able to have a conversation about it.  Unfortunately, it seems like there’s no space for polite exchange or reasoned debate or any attempt to find common ground right now, between the right-wing hate campaigns and spasms of Twitter mob outrage.  And, as usual, it’s the most vulnerable and marginalized people who suffer as a result.

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

 

Remember when people thought that Obama's election meant that we now lived in a "post-racial society"?

I didn't say it would flip immediately, but it's the direction it's trending.

 

Of course, ask a black person in Mississippi what they thought the future would be in 1865.

 

As Jon Stewart said, "society bends towards justice, but it doesn't bend towards justice by gravity, you have to bend it. And there's a bunch of people trying to bend it back."

  • True 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6c83466a999b3f77881690f25ff8aaa8.jpg
WWW.THEONION.COM

MINNEAPOLIS, MN—Bowing to the demands of the pro-moist movement, Target reportedly removed all towels from stores Thursday after a soaking-wet lunatic objected to dryness. “We apologize to the sopping individual who felt angry and threatened by our promotion of dryness,” said Target CEO Brian Cornell, explaining that…

 

  • Haha 3
  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, marioandsonic said:

No Bud Light, No Chik-Fil-A, No Target...

 

Where are these poor MAGAs supposed to go now?

maybe it will turn them anit-capitalism once they get through their dumbfuck minds that a handful of corporations own everything no matter what they "boycott"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They ARE anti corporation, pretty sure they don’t like most of capitalism, but they just don’t know what any of it means and how to fix the parts that are broken for them without accidentally making the life of someone different from them better 

  • True 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who participate in the culture war bullshit are just the lowest IQ clowns who live in completely insular communities.

 

They're not even worth arguing with or trying to rehabilitate, just ignore them & let them live in their miserable little existence of their own making.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, stepee said:

They ARE anti corporation, pretty sure they don’t like most of capitalism, but they just don’t know what any of it means and how to fix the parts that are broken for them without accidentally making the life of someone different from them better 

If the rest of you turned up to their 'boycotts' and dialed it up to 11 in their favour, maybe they'll snap back into sense, or join you in destroying capital. Either is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:


About that…

IMG-7709.png

Dudes only experience with trans women is porn. I wonder how he came across that? 🤔

 

I’ve got my entire annual salary Joey at home jacking off to trans porn while riding some object while hating himself for it all the while thinking that’s what every trans woman is.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...