Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jason said: What Trump is seeing right now..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, Jason said: Trump will get annoyed that these people are wearing all of this gear, and force them to take it off if they want to talk to the president. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 lol somebody was finally brave enough to tell him that his calling off the "negotiations" made him look stupid as usual Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Firewithin said: lol somebody was finally brave enough to tell him that his calling off the "negotiations" made him look stupid as usual Did one of the Fox talking heads bring this up on TV tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Reading these Trump tweets tonight I'm more certain than ever before that absolutely zero of the tweets from his account over the weekend were actually written by him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comet Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 15 minutes ago, Jason said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 When you stay up all night drunk-tweeting your ex but you're the President of the United States Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSpreader Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 hours ago, mclumber1 said: This will absolutely make Pence look like a chode. Good! STD pence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 What a great idea. So this was posted earlier and I actually knew the answer immediately, but I kept updating this damn thread during the primary when everyone was dropping out. How will you do on this? Three of these people ran for president this year. One of these is a stock image. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 I thought the first one was Jonathan Swan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhyteboar Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: What a great idea. So this was posted earlier and I actually knew the answer immediately, but I kept updating this damn thread during the primary when everyone was dropping out. How will you do on this? Three of these people ran for president this year. One of these is a stock image. 3 is the stock photo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 23 minutes ago, Firewithin said: lol somebody was finally brave enough to tell him that his calling off the "negotiations" made him look stupid as usual Reminds me of when he owned the shutdown with Pelosi. There is a huge difference between being responsible for shitty policy(which the GOP usually is) and openly owning it(which the GOP is usually smart enough to avoid). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, Jason said: I thought the first one was Jonathan Swan. 2 minutes ago, thewhyteboar said: 3 is the stock photo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, thewhyteboar said: 3 is the stock photo. My guess too but only because he's clearly too young Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: My guess too but only because he's clearly too young Number four is that douche canoe Rep from California right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, mclumber1 said: Number four is that douche canoe Rep from California right? 13 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Swalwell is awesome. His shtick for the debates was awful, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joestradamus Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 4 minutes ago, Joe said: Swalwell is awesome. His shtick for the debates was awful, though. My wife says he's a jerk and that he sucks. She reached out to him and his office multiple times for help (for work, city job) and they were less than helpful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Jason said: That's one hell of an October surprise. I declassified it long ago! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Double post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Ricofoley said: Those numbers for 65+ also seemed unthinkably bad for Trump. If the GOP doesn't have seniors they basically have nothing. Especially considering that most of their voter suppression is designed to disenfranchise just about everyone except seniors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 I got my ballot in the mail today. Who should I vote for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Vic20 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 32 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said: I got my ballot in the mail today. Who should I vote for? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 40 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said: I got my ballot in the mail today. Who should I vote for? Presidents are temporary. Wu-Tang is forever. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 I’m not really understanding the criticism of being overly pessimistic and to follow the data when the vast majority of simulations being run erupt in chaos. Is it “follow the data! Well... not that data” Experts held 'war games' on the Trump vs. Biden election. Their finding? Brace for a mess WWW.USATODAY.COM A team of experts who gamed out the Nov. 3 election found an "alarming" risk of a contested outcome and the possibility of a constitutional crisis. IIRC one group ran 500 simulations based on various data and only a single one of those 500 didn’t erupt in chaos. This is where my personal pessimism is coming from - the only “safe” outcome is if Biden wins in a landslide on election night, which will not happen due to delays in mail-in counting caused by the GOP being a bunch of fuckers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: I’m not really understanding the criticism of being overly pessimistic and to follow the data when the vast majority of simulations being run erupt in chaos. Is it “follow the data! Well... not that data” Experts held 'war games' on the Trump vs. Biden election. Their finding? Brace for a mess WWW.USATODAY.COM A team of experts who gamed out the Nov. 3 election found an "alarming" risk of a contested outcome and the possibility of a constitutional... IIRC one group ran 500 simulations based on various data and only a single one of those 500 didn’t erupt in chaos. This is where my personal pessimism is coming from - the only “safe” outcome is if Biden wins in a landslide on election night, which will not happen due to delays in mail-in counting caused by the GOP being a bunch of fuckers. Video/interview on it via Samantha Bee’s show: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 18 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: I’m not really understanding the criticism of being overly pessimistic and to follow the data when the vast majority of simulations being run erupt in chaos. Is it “follow the data! Well... not that data” Experts held 'war games' on the Trump vs. Biden election. Their finding? Brace for a mess WWW.USATODAY.COM A team of experts who gamed out the Nov. 3 election found an "alarming" risk of a contested outcome and the possibility of a constitutional crisis. IIRC one group ran 500 simulations based on various data and only a single one of those 500 didn’t erupt in chaos. This is where my personal pessimism is coming from - the only “safe” outcome is if Biden wins in a landslide on election night, which will not happen due to delays in mail-in counting caused by the GOP being a bunch of fuckers. My straw man is that it boils down to "look at what they're openly saying and doing" vs "there's no way they'd do that" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Signifyin(g)Monkey Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 8 hours ago, osxmatt said: I declassified it long ago! I’m trying to get my head around what they’re saying happened here. The declassified info apparently indicates Brennan knew that Hillary planned on stirring up a scandal that tied Trump to Russian Intelligence Services. (And that Obama was at one point briefed on it) What I can’t divine is whether it also clearly indicates the Mueller investigation was based on that—or whether the latter is an extra conspiratorial conjecture Republicans are making? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted October 7, 2020 Author Share Posted October 7, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.