Ghost_MH Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, Joe said: I did literally 10 seconds of digging and found this. I rest my case. We can definitely move on! It was a stressful time, but this shit was constant around here and Spork isn't going to gaslight me into thinking it didn't happen. That's literally what I just reiterated just now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 17 minutes ago, Joe said: I did literally 10 seconds of digging and found this. I rest my case. We can definitely move on! It was a stressful time, but this shit was constant around here and Spork isn't going to gaslight me into thinking it didn't happen. I didn’t gaslight, I seriously asked and you refused, then started saying that I can’t read and whatever else. You showed one person and the very drive-bys I talked about with the first couple. I just went to that date to see what BM was responding to with the 10/6 post, you missed this follow-up where he clarifies: On 10/6/2020 at 12:34 PM, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Yes. The entire current republican project, from CJR to Trump to Cruz is predicted upon voter suppression and counter majoritarian rule; you see it now in gerrymandered state legislatures and you see it in their overt and open questioning right now of the ballots cast in the upcoming election, looking for any technical reason to throw out ballots in "the right areas" I want to be wrong, trust me. Scotus will come down on Trump's side, whether it gets sent up to them is the tossup So, you definitively have one person, one you’re definitely not targeting with your posts, and kinda BM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 15 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: I didn’t gaslight, I seriously asked and you refused, then started saying that I can’t read and whatever else. You showed one person and the very drive-bys I talked about with the first couple. I just went to that date to see what BM was responding to with the 10/6 post, you missed this follow-up where he clarifies: So, you definitively have one person, one you’re definitely not targeting with your posts, and kinda BM? Quote If it's even remotely close, yes. If it's not, I give it a tossup. Especially if only one state is required to flip the election, like Biden with 279 electors. I agree with the assessment of@Ghost_MH here Kinda BM. Sure bud, ok. Move on. This shit was constant here and I bet you this was the first time you saw those posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe said: I bet you this was the first time you saw those posts. I replied on the next page, on 10/7 actually. I was shocked that the thought was controversial, I mean, the 100% always was, but the very idea shouldn’t have been. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Spork3245 said: I replied on the next page, on 10/7 actually. Well then not sure how you forgot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Just now, Joe said: Well then not sure how you forgot. Which is why I asked? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyPiranha Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 For the love of fucking god can we end the debate over who doom posted what and when? This is stressful enough as is without the constant pointless bickering. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Folks I have bad news for you if you're looking for consistency in what I say and when 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said: For the love of fucking god can we end the debate over who doom posted what and when? This is stressful enough as is without the constant pointless bickering. I won't post about it anymore for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Biden launches sales pitch for his defense secretary pick - The Washington Post WWW.WASHINGTONPOST.COM Biden on Wednesday introduced retired Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, his pick for defense chief, launching his weeks-long pitch that Austin is the right choice despite the tradition of civilian leadership at the Pentagon. I honesty didn't know the waiver was a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, Joe said: I honesty didn't know the waiver was a thing Libs already memory hole-ing the trump years smdh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 1 minute ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Libs already memory hole-ing the trump years smdh Yep, I had no idea Mattis got one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 the coup will happen lets prepare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, Firewithin said: the coup will happen lets prepare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhyteboar Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 8 minutes ago, Joe said: Biden launches sales pitch for his defense secretary pick - The Washington Post WWW.WASHINGTONPOST.COM Biden on Wednesday introduced retired Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, his pick for defense chief, launching his weeks-long pitch that Austin is the right choice despite the tradition of civilian leadership at the Pentagon. I honesty didn't know the waiver was a thing. I've no idea if he will be good or not, but I'm sick of generals in government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, thewhyteboar said: I've no idea if he will be good or not, but I'm sick of generals in government. Same, I'd also love to get people out of government who are/have been on the raytheon board of directors but big L-O-L there too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairslinger Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 4 minutes ago, Joe said: Yep, I had no idea Mattis got one! I learned about this waiver thing because of Mattis. While it is something I would generally be against, I remember it was one of the few moves early on in the Trump administration that I wasn't opposed to because Mattis was one of the very few people Trump nominated that was actually qualified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyPiranha Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, Chairslinger said: I learned about this waiver thing because of Mattis. While it is something I would generally be against, I remember it was one of the few moves early on in the Trump administration that I wasn't opposed to because Mattis was one of the very few people Trump nominated that was actually qualified. You know the only reason trump even considered him was because he liked the nickname mad dog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris- Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 @sblfilms reading this thread right now: 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 3 hours ago, Spork3245 said: The alarming thing should be that the seal has been pulled back on this type of behavior. If anyone thinks that Trump will be the only Republican to attempt this now that it’s a thing is kidding themselves. this to me has been the scariest part of Donald’s Presidency has been knowing a more competent Republican now knows they could get away with so much. That maybe the only reason things haven’t really gotten bad in past Republican administrations was norms and fear of impeachment and prosecution. Both things that Donald has shown are meaningless. Its a good thing Republicans didn’t control the House or Senate in 1973 or we’d have found out back then. fuck the Republican Party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 1 hour ago, LazyPiranha said: For the love of fucking god can we end the debate over who doom posted what and when? This is stressful enough as is without the constant pointless bickering. I'm glad you said that because my mood is such that I'm on the verge of nuking this thread entirely. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 So all these loopholes Trump exploited/exposed... can they be closed by adding new rules/laws? Dems need it because GOP could do it again... and GOP can agree too as a means to prevent possible Democrat payback Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chadatog Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: I'm glad you said that because my mood is such that I'm on the verge of nuking this thread entirely. Do it from orbit just to be sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 2 minutes ago, 5timechamp said: and GOP can agree too as a means to prevent possible Democrat payback Oh my sweet summer child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chakoo Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: I'm glad you said that because my mood is such that I'm on the verge of nuking this thread entirely. And about how much leg would we need to show to make this happen? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, 5timechamp said: So all these loopholes Trump exploited/exposed... can they be closed by adding new rules/laws? In theory, yes. In practice, it will never happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air_Delivery Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 The biggest takeaway of all of this is that Republicans are no doubt going to use this an excuse to instate even more draconian voting laws in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 19 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: I'm glad you said that because my mood is such that I'm on the verge of nuking this thread entirely. This thread should be nuked regardless. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazyPiranha Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 15 minutes ago, 5timechamp said: So all these loopholes Trump exploited/exposed... can they be closed by adding new rules/laws? Dems need it because GOP could do it again... and GOP can agree too as a means to prevent possible Democrat payback No? There are largely no "loopholes" to exploit. They're exploiting an angry mob and essentially thumbing their nose at literal, actual established law. What can you possibly do to people who don't actually give a fuck about the law itself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 28 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: I'm glad you said that because my mood is such that I'm on the verge of nuking this thread entirely. Damn we ain't handheld 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 10 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said: No? There are largely no "loopholes" to exploit. They're exploiting an angry mob and essentially thumbing their nose at literal, actual established law. What can you possibly do to people who don't actually give a fuck about the law itself? -things like Electoral College Electors being bound to cast their votes in accordance to the votes.. it keeps being stated that its not in writing to vote against the popular vote, its just not a “wise” move -States suing for other states, u know odd shit like that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted December 10, 2020 Author Share Posted December 10, 2020 12 minutes ago, Joe said: This thread should be nuked regardless. Hold up a damn minute. I put a lot of work for two years posting every update imaginable and going through a list of 7 quadrillion candidates for this to be nuked due to immaturity. Hell no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5timechamp Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 21 minutes ago, Air_Delivery said: The biggest takeaway of all of this is that Republicans are no doubt going to use this an excuse to instate even more draconian voting laws in the future. which is all good and fine for them cause their media wing will bark to the skies if Democrats violate them snd the GOP will ignore as they see fit.. as has been happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.