Chris-

dude you got fucking santa claus tattooed on your chest

The writing is on the wall for our good friend, Wade...His city is infested with MAGA chuds, his roommate is drinking her own pee, shots are regularly fired outside of his luxury condo, and now Amazon is moving in next door. It's not a good situation, especially for Inuk. The good news, however, is that change is on the horizon. This thread is to officially announce Wade's interest in establishing his own HQ2, escaping the DC metro hellscape for greener pastures (metaphorical and/or physical). Interested candidates should state their case for why Wade should move to their city, with the grand prize being that Wade will actually move to your city (and let you play with Inuk). This is not a joke: Wade will actually move to your city. He's a 'federal contractor', which is literally the most amorphous job imaginable; he could telecommute from fucking Antarctica for all anyone really knows. I don't want to come in with a low-ball pitch/offer/bribe, so I'll let you gentlemen go first.

I'm sure your wife would appreciate it if you learned the finer points of edging like the rest of us.

At this point, seeing Trump go down is secondary to you motherfuckers just being proven wrong.

Here's a question for you fellas: Does Detective Pikachu fuck?

I have the gold for beating Bloodborne, something @Man of Culture never did. That's the only one that matters.

Your original comment was in response to an idea about the top marginal bracket, so how was I suppose to know you were suggesting some kind of COL adjustment?

There are probably only three (New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles) - maybe four (Seattle) - areas where 100k is only 'middle class'. How many $100k earners live in those areas? Yeah, no. Basing national tax policy on a minority of cases is asinine.

I don't think I could tolerate 14 more months of Berniebros.

I cannot wait to get as high as I possibly can and watch this. CAN'T WAIT.

Back and to the left, from atop a book depository.

As my friend studying for an economics PhD pointed out last weekend when I thought about stealing a cool mug from a bar, the economic value those pillows represent to you is far greater than it is for the hotel. I ended up not taking it, because I'm not an asshole, but you should still take the pillow.

So, two questions then: 1. Can you defend yourself without a weapon? 2. Does self-defense entail a certain type of weaponry?

Whether or not $100,000 goes far in Manhattan is irrelevant, because we should not be basing tax brackets on outlier cost-of-living areas.

Because who wants to click through multiple spoiler tags?