sblfilms

Pivetta legit had less than 10 bad pitches the whole night, and only one the Astros took advantage of. I think the RedSox will be alright, the heart of the lineup has been great and the other guys will pick up steam (or maybe are already?). And the just bad luck of late game losses won’t continue. With the extra playoff spot starting this year, they have plenty of time to get back into the mix. This is absolutely not a sub .500 team.

The only reason to “justify” your moral position is to cajole other people to your side. This isn’t possible. It literally wouldn’t matter if we lived in a perfect society in which every need is met for all people.

The nonsense is that the improvement in the material well being of children would change any of your calculus on the morality of choice or anti-choice sentiment. It’s hogwash off the highest order, and you know it You also don’t believe in morality!

Using federal courts to handle every securities issue is not great

This is utter nonsense

Which is fine, I don’t know why so few are willing to articulate that which they quite obviously believe. I think @CitizenVectronis one of the few who will, which I certainly respect. And we know @Commissar SFLUFANis not simply pro-choice but actively pro-abortion (whoops, I just saw his post when I updated in the middle of typing this)

You are correct that it is illegal currently, it is also true that the left in America would like to remove all and nearly all pre-birth abortion restrictions. Some where around 40% of liberals say absolutely no restrictions. And I would be utterly shocked if you (and almost everybody on this board) don’t fall into the 40%. So why not own that position? Why run away from these questions instead of standing firm on your convictions that women deserve the right to make whatever choice they want with their body?

Kermit Gosnell - Wikipedia EN.M.WIKIPEDIA.ORG It actually gets worse than that, but these of course are the absolute most extremes.

Dodger is correct that the discussion almost always devolves to edge cases, which is a diversion. For example, were an anti-abortion activist to grant that rape/incest/ectopic pregnancies/etc. are protected reasons for abortion, the pro-abortion activist is not going to go along with limits on the vast majority of other abortions because the edge cases are not why they support the right to an abortion.

Read the tax filing. It’s all the typical ways money gets funneled to friends and family by paying them for work they don’t actually do, or giving contracts to family members at above market rates. The easiest way to see the griftiness is to see that a bunch of these firms BLM org paid were new LLCs owned by family or close friends of one of the board members. This is the main way people extract money out of organizations, creating for profit entities that charge the non-prof consulting/service fees. The only reason this is coming to light now is that the new board has tried to shine a light on things.

Hello, 2022 AL ROY

Boston Red Sox starter Nathan Eovaldi the third pitcher ever to allow five homers in one inning WWW.ESPN.COM Boston starter Nathan Eovaldi became the third pitcher in major league history to allow five home runs in one inning Tuesday night, when the Astros tagged the Red Sox veteran in the second inning at... Feel bad for Nate. I really can’t believe Cora left him out there so long.

Nothing is passive, even the status quo is fought for

Gonna look good in a Dodgers uni

I think Musk is probably right that Twitter is lying about the bot numbers