Jump to content

~*The Official Thread of One Term/Twice Impeached/Worst of Them All Presidential Tantrums, Candy Throwing, and Pants Shitting*~


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Emperor Diocletian II said:

There's something insanely hilarious about those insults for guys who have been dead for over a century.

 

It's not just about the long-ago dead.

 

Quote

The president has repeatedly disparaged the intelligence of service members, and asked that wounded veterans be kept out of military parades, multiple sources tell The Atlantic.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

40% of voters are guaranteed to vote for the guy calling American war dead "losers," while also believing he is more pro-military than Biden.

:flag:

40% of voters are going to peel off their "Support the Troops" magnets from their obscene trucks and replace them with "Screw off, losers."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

He also asked who the good guys were.

 

 

Under other circumstances, in academic circles, that would be a valid question for WWI!

 

Trump the academic!

 

But yeah, there were really no good guys in World War I.  Maybe you can say everyone who didn't get involved in the insanity were good?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ricofoley said:

I don't know if there's anything that Trump could possibly do or say at this point that would actually erode his approval ratings in a meaningful way, but the White House seems to think that there's at least a chance that this is actually it.


Why mobilize fast? Just get President Shithead in front of cameras and say it’s fake news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the NYT's reporting on the "losers" story is...something. The lede is that Trump is moving quickly to deny it. They don't directly address the facts until paragraph 9, where they confirm that they have corroborating sources.

 

So instead of the story being about how he actually said it, they frame it as about him denying it. Classic fucking NTY bootlickers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

So the NYT's reporting on the "losers" story is...something. The lede is that Trump is moving quickly to deny it. They don't directly address the facts until paragraph 9, where they confirm that they have corroborating sources.

 

So instead of the story being about how he actually said it, they frame it as about him denying it. Classic fucking NTY bootlickers.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2020 at 7:58 AM, skillzdadirecta said:

Like someone said to me last night, what kind of person do you think could be married to a person like Trump far as long as she has been. 

 

 

People like Charles Manson and other notorious serials killers get marriage proposals from women more attractive than most men are dating. For better or worse she's married to someone who is rich, famous, and powerful. It's probably not all that much different from that buddy you know who will put himself through ritualistic abuse to be with a "hot" girl. 

 

Shit just watch 90 day fiance and see what shit people will marry just to get a green card to get out of a poor country. Probably isn't much different for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...