Jump to content

Joe Biden beats Donald Trump, officially making Trump a one-term twice impeached, twice popular-vote losing president


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RedSoxFan9 said:

 

 

oNWcFM1.jpg

 

I’m sure this will get the same treatment as omar’s tweet

 

Considering his age and income over the last 40 years, Sanders should have been a multi-millionaire YEARS ago.  But he's shitty with his money.  He's the type of person who "invests" in timeshares, I bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my advisers are shit, i trust a dictator who would literally pave a road with his people's corpses if it pleased him, and i'm happy he called my opponent an idiot whos name i can't spell, and is apparently a signal for me to jump off a bridge.

 

Like honestly, this helps Biden more than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elizabeth Warren is now among Democratic front runners

Elizabeth Warren has made inroads among Democrats, especially liberals.  Just about as many Democratic primary voters in the latest Economist/YouGov Poll say they are considering the Massachusetts Senator for the Democratic presidential nomination as are considering Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Warren still lags behind former Vice President Joe Biden by just a few percentage points on this question.

 

:pray:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaladinSolo said:

Seems like more half the field will definitely be gone for the 3rd debate.

 

 

 

I'm most interested in how much better Harris is doing than Booker and Gillibrand. All of them seemed in, say, 2012, to be rising stars in the party, all in the Senate, and I'd say Gillibrand/Booker were significantly more notable at the time than Harris. But they've had a harder time gaining traction than Harris so far.

 

I don't see a huge charisma difference, either. Fortunately for them, debates can be really good for helping low-polling people. And also fortunately for them, doing better in Iowa/New Hampshire is better than polling nationally at this point.

 

Also fortunate for them is that it's May 2019, not January 2020. :p 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

 

I'm most interested in how much better Harris is doing than Booker and Gillibrand. All of them seemed in, say, 2012, to be rising stars in the party, all in the Senate, and I'd say Gillibrand/Booker were significantly more notable at the time than Harris. But they've had a harder time gaining traction than Harris so far.

 

I don't see a huge charisma difference, either. Fortunately for them, debates can be really good for helping low-polling people. And also fortunately for them, doing better in Iowa/New Hampshire is better than polling nationally at this point.

 

Also fortunate for them is that it's May 2019, not January 2020. :p 

 

Not sure about Booker, but one thing that comes to mind is that I'd bet primary voters are more likely than average to still remember Gillibrand pouncing on drumming Franken out, and to still be unhappy with her over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...