Jump to content

First presidential debate between Biden and Trump, tonight at 9pm ET


Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, TyphoidHater said:

 

To them, trump totally condemned the proud boys

 

And they point out past times that Trump has condemned white supremacists and the KKK, but why couldn't he do it again last night? Why does it always seem like a struggle with this clown? His "sure" when asked if he would condemn them was enough. Even if he was constantly, clearly condemning these people, isn't the fact that these people are always endorsing him, are always getting excited for his policy proposals enough to stop and say, "OK maybe this guy isn't the right choice for president"? These apologists for Trump are tiresome. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jason said:

Maybe Trump is just really into shoving giant dildos up your butt to own the libz.

 

"Yes I did pay two Russian prostitutes to urinate on me and themselves, but what the fake news won't tell you is that it was on a bed that Obama slept in. Obama! Can you believe it? Obama slept in that bed, and we pissed on it. We pissed on Obama. We beat the radical left. Obama. It was a tremendous thing. Obama."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Candidates microphones could be cut off if they interrupt during the next debate

 

gettyimages-1228795203.jpg
WWW.CBSNEWS.COM

The announcement from the Commission on Presidential Debates comes after the first debate between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden spiraled into chaos.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sblfilms said:

Mics should always be cut during the times the candidate is given uninterrupted time.

 

They should take it a step further and not even have these guys in the same room. It should be done digitally. Ask a question, camera and mic goes to the room of candidate being asked the question. Then it moves to the other for rebuttal. Rinse/repeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said:

 

They should take it a step further and not even have these guys in the same room. It should be done digitally. Ask a question, camera and mic goes to the room of candidate being asked the question. Then it moves to the other for rebuttal. Rinse/repeat.


Get Max Kellerman to host a debate on the Around The Horn platform 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

 

 

 

Fine asshole, don't show up.

 

You are the one that needs the needle to move, not Biden. For weeks Trump has been begging for more debate time because he seemed to believe his own bullshit that Biden was a doddering, senile pushover. Now that Biden gave a decent, not even great, performance Trump is ready to walk away.

 

But, again, Biden isn't the one that needs the debates at this point.

 

3 minutes ago, sblfilms said:

Mics should always be cut during the times the candidate is given uninterrupted time.

 

 

This is probably the best way to go rather than selective muting by the moderator.

 

In an ideal situation allowing others to interject is probably better. But even with someone much less of a contentious asshole than Trump it ruins any semblance of a debate.

 

With Trump in it, it is the most predictable thing in the world that it's going to be a pointless shitshow. He had 3 pointless shitshows with Hillary, he had 1 with Biden, and he'll have 2 more if nothing changes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the US needs (and what makes Canadian debates so great) is a French-language candidate that has no chance of winning, but is there simply to point out obvious things. In Canadian elections there are always two debates, one in French, and one in English. In the French debate, they are all going for Quebec voters. In the English debate, they are going for all the rest of voters...but the Bloc only runs candidates in Quebec, so the Bloc leader doesn't give a shit. So they say whatever actually makes sense, and it makes them look much more reasonable than the rest of the leaders who are afraid to offend anyone. It's fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

What the US needs (and what makes Canadian debates so great) is a French-language candidate that has no chance of winning, but is there simply to point out obvious things. In Canadian elections there are always two debates, one in French, and one in English. In the French debate, they are all going for Quebec voters. In the English debate, they are going for all the rest of voters...but the Bloc only runs candidates in Quebec, so the Bloc leader doesn't give a shit. So they say whatever actually makes sense, and it makes them look much more reasonable than the rest of the leaders who are afraid to offend anyone. It's fantastic.

 

It's why the debate organization should include any party candidate that has a mathematical ability to win the election (that is, is on enough state ballots to achieve 270 electoral votes).  This would mean You'd have 4 candidates on stage this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

 

It's why the debate organization should include any party candidate that has a mathematical ability to win the election (that is, is on enough state ballots to achieve 270 electoral votes).  This would mean You'd have 4 candidates on stage this year.  

 

I'm not listening to Jo Jorgensen, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...