Jump to content

~*Official #COVID-19 Thread of Doom*~ Revenge of Omicron Prime


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Air_Delivery said:

While I get what the WHO is saying, each country is gonna look out for no.1 first especially with new variants on the horizon. You don't wanna start boosters after a new vaccine resistant strain is found.

 

More than anything there needs to be a more formal collaboration between countries to get poor countries vaccinated.

Yes.  You're right.

The fundamental problem with the WHO, is that they are focused on redistributing the vaccines that are already being manufactured, rather than coordinating increased production of vaccines.

I can see a scenario where everyone needs a new booster, EVERY YEAR for the forseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the logic of these people. If it’s good enough for a horse, it’s good enough for me? If Fox could keep a fucking pandemic story straight, they could help a fuck ton of people. Sadly they all probably have stock in this Ivermectin shit, and nothing speaks louder then a bigger bank account to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

There is currently no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin. There is no evidence that any early cases had any connection to the WIV, in contrast to the clear epidemiological links to animal markets in Wuhan, nor evidence that the WIV possessed or worked on a progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 prior to the pandemic. The suspicion that SARS-CoV-2 might have a laboratory origin stems from the coincidence that it was first detected in a city that houses a major virological laboratory that studies coronaviruses. Wuhan is the largest city in central China with multiple animal markets and is a major hub for travel and commerce, well connected to other areas both within China and internationally. The link to Wuhan therefore more likely reflects the fact that pathogens often require heavily populated areas to become established (Pekar et al., 2021).

 

We contend that although the animal reservoir for SARS-CoV-2 has not been identified and the key species may not have been tested, in contrast to other scenarios there is substantial body of scientific evidence supporting a zoonotic origin. While the possibility of a laboratory accident cannot be entirely dismissed, and may be near impossible to falsify, this conduit for emergence is highly unlikely relative to the numerous and repeated human-animal contacts that occur routinely in the wildlife trade. Failure to comprehensively investigate the zoonotic origin through collaborative and carefully coordinated studies would leave the world vulnerable to future pandemics arising from the same human activities that have repeatedly put us on a collision course with novel viruses.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

 

Their argument primarily boils down to "most historical pandemics came from zoonotic spillover, so this one probably did too."

There's more to it than that if you read the paper, but that is an argument made (because it's not wrong!)

 

I just posted a clip from the conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

There's more to it than that if you read the paper, but that is an argument made (because it's not wrong!)

 

I just posted a clip from the conclusion.

I read the paper.  They're not really providing any compelling evidence -- its all completely circumstantial.  From their paper:

Quote

No bat reservoir nor intermediate animal host for SARS-CoV-2 has been identified to date. This is presumably because the right animal species and/or populations have not yet been sampled and/or any progenitor virus may be at low prevalence.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, CitizenVectron said:
1628870215323-image-45.png?image-resize-
WWW.VICE.COM

There's no scientific truth in the meme that unvaccinated sperm is more pure or safe than that from people who've been vaccinated against COVID-19. 

 

 

Stupidity can be genetic.  Good way for people to weed out the dumbass sperm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

I read the paper.  They're not really providing any compelling evidence -- its all completely circumstantial.  From their paper:

 

Now quote the rest of the paragraph with some important context:

Quote

Initial cross-species transmission events are also very likely to go undetected. Most SARS-CoV-2 index case infections will not have resulted in sustained onward transmission (Pekar et al., 2021) and only a very small fraction of spillovers from animals to humans result in major outbreaks. Indeed, the animal origins of many well-known human pathogens, including Ebola virus, Hepatitis C virus, poliovirus, and the coronaviruses HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-NL63, are yet to be identified, while it took over a decade to discover bat viruses with >95% similarity to SARS-CoV and able to use hACE-2 as a receptor (Hu et al., 2017)

Further there's also no evidence of related viruses being worked on at WIV and the article also answers why specific scenarios that would indicate a lab leak have no evidence for them.

Lastly,

Quote

Under any laboratory escape scenario SARS-CoV-2 would have to have been present in a laboratory prior to the pandemic, yet no evidence exists to support such a notion and no sequence has been identified that could have served as a precursor.

Lab origin isn't fully ruled out but it seems very highly unlikely. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Normal place:

 

screen_shot_2020-12-17_at_1.15.58_pm.png
WWW.SACURRENT.COM

As legal battles intensify between Gov. Greg Abbott and municipalities who push back against his order banning local mask mandates, Texas Attorney General Ken...

 

 

What was he indicted for again? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:
Y557HCPFPVENOZJ3Q3QDV3GCBA.jpg
WWW.DALLASNEWS.COM

The Watchdog reveals a worst-case scenario plan devised by area doctors. In the event of no ICU beds available, vaccination status could be used as part of...

 

 

Hope this is the first of many medical networks out there to make such a decision.  Plenty of medical professionals are losing patience in dealing with the unvaccinated and by no means should they take a bed opposed to somebody who was responsible or is there for other reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...