Jump to content

~*The Official Thread of One Term/Twice Impeached/Worst of Them All Presidential Tantrums, Candy Throwing, and Pants Shitting*~


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

My dude do you think I'm disagreeing with you?  I thought my opening post was dripping with snark where 3 of the largest population states that are "swing States" but labeled as "small states". This is based on an actual conversation I've had on Facebook regarding the EC

Fair enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

Stop bitching about the electoral college and support the method that will make it more fair:  Expand the House of Representatives.  It's one of the few things that would work that doesn't require an amendment to the Constitution.  A simple bill that strikes the apportionment act from law would result in hundreds of new representatives and smaller legislative districts.  In turn, it would also result in more electoral votes for each state.

Yes, let’s not actually fix the issue. Let’s do something else, that while also needed still will not solve correct our Presidential elections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Spawn_of_Apathy said:

Yes, let’s not actually fix the issue. Let’s do something else, that while also needed still will not solve correct our Presidential elections. 

This should be done, but not for the sole (or even primary) purpose of having more fair presidential elections. Expanding the house for presidential elections is a bandaid at best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

Stop bitching about the electoral college and support the method that will make it more fair:  Expand the House of Representatives.  It's one of the few things that would work that doesn't require an amendment to the Constitution.  A simple bill that strikes the apportionment act from law would result in hundreds of new representatives and smaller legislative districts.  In turn, it would also result in more electoral votes for each state.

 

Expanding the house will never happen. You know why? The larger a house of elected officials, the less control the leadership has over it. House members want those sweet committee positions and similar responsibilities, and they will only get them if they tow the party line. 

 

That is actually another great reason to massively expand the size of democratic lower houses in western nations, as it leads to power being moved closer to voters. But people like Pelosi would never allow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2019 at 3:03 PM, mclumber1 said:

Stop bitching about the electoral college and support the method that will make it more fair:  Expand the House of Representatives.  It's one of the few things that would work that doesn't require an amendment to the Constitution.  A simple bill that strikes the apportionment act from law would result in hundreds of new representatives and smaller legislative districts.  In turn, it would also result in more electoral votes for each state.

 

Why not both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Dipshot Donnie rage-tweeting on the way to the funeral he's really excited to go to. Classy.

 

 

 

Yeah, AOC and Omar are so racist and anti-Semitic they’re constantly seen with Bernie Sanders, and old white Jew.

 

Trevor Noah was spot on when he said that Trump’s attack on them is racist because he never told Bernie Sanders to go back to where he came from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MarSolo said:

The messed up part is when (if?) he's out of office, he's still going to be the face of the Republican Party. 

 

He's going to be all over Fox News, if not have his own show by that point.

 

Which is why I'm betting he'll resign during transition to get a pardon from Pence, in exchange Trump backs Pence in 2024. Otherwise he'll either be in a long drawn out criminal trial, or raising hell during the primaries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/25/how-did-trump-end-up-front-presidential-seal-doctored-include-russian-symbol/?fbclid=IwAR3aXDAvp4GaZxfpGjOvqg6KzlNo4fdoSuAq8j6djIiZ4BmCXBYGLIoew_U&utm_term=.73a2baaa23a5

 

D3RWD3W2JJCMRJTVTPBT55EMFI.jpg

 

The eagle has two heads instead of one — a symbol historically tied to empire and dominance. It closely resembles the bird on the Russian coat of arms and also appears on the flags of Serbia, Albania and Montenegro. Its left talons, rather than clasping 13 arrows, appear to clutch a set of golf clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said:

05a9a00b50f2c65bb25527608fd0750b_9913365

Everything about this seal is great. You can also buy it on shirts. The golf clubs are great. The Spanish saying "45 es in titere" is great. The hammer and suckle instead of stars is good. Also, what is that in the eagle's right claws?

Looks like dollar bills, but the shadows seem to also spell out IRA :clap:

 

That coat of arms is amazing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...