Jump to content

Goldeneye 007’s lost Xbox 360 remaster has leaked—as a full-game speedrun

Jason

By Jason
in The Spawn Point

 Share

Recommended Posts

stepee

stepee

Posted
Posted

Man they gotta find a way to decompile this and port it to pc. Just take this and have someone do a texture and model pack and give me that and I’ll never think about a Goldeneye remake again.

stepee

stepee

Posted
Posted

And watching that video there IS still something about the game. Something in how the shooting looks and sounds it’s deadly and quick and still has a certain quality to it.

crispy4000

crispy4000

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, stepee said:

And watching that video there IS still something about the game. Something in how the shooting looks and sounds it’s deadly and quick and still has a certain quality to it.

 

Absolutely.  People who think it was only good in hindsight should definitely watch.  The fundamentals were always strong.

  • 10 months later...
Zaku3

Zaku3

Posted
Posted
On 2/1/2021 at 10:15 AM, Reputator said:

Held up by rightsholders. How sad.

 

Translation: Nintendo was like fuck no if it had to also release on the 360.

 

I wonder if the PS3 release of the Wii Goldeneye works. It was a pretty cool game. I could probably play it on dolphin but I don't care enough about the Wii to bother trying to get the Wiimote to work on my PC.

LazyPiranha

LazyPiranha

Posted
Posted
On 12/31/2021 at 11:18 PM, Zaku3 said:

 

Translation: Nintendo was like fuck no if it had to also release on the 360.

 

I wonder if the PS3 release of the Wii Goldeneye works. It was a pretty cool game. I could probably play it on dolphin but I don't care enough about the Wii to bother trying to get the Wiimote to work on my PC.


The weirdest part of the story for me, and lord knows I don’t know how the games industry works internally, is how does all that work get done without a firm yes from all parties?  Who does this much work on hope?  Someone, somewhere made a really bad call, and even if Nintendo was the final no, it still seems bizarre that this much of a game was good to go before some made sure.

GameDadGrant

GameDadGrant

Posted
Posted
On 12/31/2021 at 11:18 PM, Zaku3 said:

Translation: Nintendo was like fuck no if it had to also release on the 360.

 

Nope! That is incorrect.

 

It was actually MGM Studios and its shareholders that put the damper on that. Apparently the studio only wants to feature Bond-licensed merchandise with the *current* actor playing James Bond. Because the Goldeneye remake still featured Pierce Brosnan, it was disallowed. (that is also why in the official, actually released remake, Daniel Craig plays 007, not Brosnan) 

 

I wonder if this 360 remake could be released now, though? Since not only are we currently *between* Bond actors, but also Amazon owns the movie license, not MGM. I don't want to be too optimistic, but...maybe it could happen?!? 

Kal-El814

Kal-El814

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, GameDadGrant said:

 

Nope! That is incorrect.

 

It was actually MGM Studios and its shareholders that put the damper on that. Apparently the studio only wants to feature Bond-licensed merchandise with the *current* actor playing James Bond. Because the Goldeneye remake still featured Pierce Brosnan, it was disallowed. (that is also why in the official, actually released remake, Daniel Craig plays 007, not Brosnan) 

 

I wonder if this 360 remake could be released now, though? Since not only are we currently *between* Bond actors, but also Amazon owns the movie license, not MGM. I don't want to be too optimistic, but...maybe it could happen?!? 

 

I think it's been like this for a long time, too. IIRC there were leaked pics from N64 development that showed different Bonds (Connery, Moore, etc.) in the character select screen, but they never made it to the actual game.

 

EDIT - apparently this was a hoax, lol

GameDadGrant

GameDadGrant

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said:

 

Look a few posts above, the reason this thread was bumped in the first place.

 

Right, it's been *leaked* but not officially released. Unless I misunderstood?

 

2 minutes ago, Kal-El814 said:

 

I think it's been like this for a long time, too. IIRC there were leaked pics from N64 development that showed different Bonds (Connery, Moore, etc.) in the character select screen, but they never made it to the actual game.

 

This is correct. RARE put in all the different Bond actors into the N64 game originally. But MGM stepped in and said no to that. So all we got was Brosnan. Sad, but true. 

Keyser_Soze

Keyser_Soze

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, GameDadGrant said:

Right, it's been *leaked* but not officially released. Unless I misunderstood?

 

Achievements for the game went up 2 days ago indicating a possible release of the game.

  • stepee 1
Zaku3

Zaku3

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, GameDadGrant said:

 

Nope! That is incorrect.

 

It was actually MGM Studios and its shareholders that put the damper on that. Apparently the studio only wants to feature Bond-licensed merchandise with the *current* actor playing James Bond. Because the Goldeneye remake still featured Pierce Brosnan, it was disallowed. (that is also why in the official, actually released remake, Daniel Craig plays 007, not Brosnan) 

 

I wonder if this 360 remake could be released now, though? Since not only are we currently *between* Bond actors, but also Amazon owns the movie license, not MGM. I don't want to be too optimistic, but...maybe it could happen?!? 

 

Ok I take that back. Love you Nintendo. 

imthesoldier

imthesoldier

Posted
Posted
On 1/2/2022 at 10:35 AM, GameDadGrant said:

 

Nope! That is incorrect.

 

It was actually MGM Studios and its shareholders that put the damper on that. Apparently the studio only wants to feature Bond-licensed merchandise with the *current* actor playing James Bond. Because the Goldeneye remake still featured Pierce Brosnan, it was disallowed. (that is also why in the official, actually released remake, Daniel Craig plays 007, not Brosnan) 

 

I wonder if this 360 remake could be released now, though? Since not only are we currently *between* Bond actors, but also Amazon owns the movie license, not MGM. I don't want to be too optimistic, but...maybe it could happen?!? 

 

Given the situation, it wouldn't be the worst idea if they simply changed the face of Bond to the current actor...though Craig is officially done with Bond, so maybe it's in Bond limbo where it might be feasible today? Using Brosnan's Bond as a remaster/port would fit the narrative of reintroducing the game to younger fans who maybe did not play it back in the day, despite that Brosnan is no longer Bond himself (How I would love to see either Dalton, or Brosnan play a Bond villain) 

 

And before some folks mention how Goldeneye hasn't aged well, it's the framerate hasn't aged well. Sure the controls aren't what we use today, though Dual Analog was possible on the original N64 version using two controllers. So even coding dual analog wouldn't be needed. The gameplay of Goldeneye I think has overall stood the test of time because of its replayability, the unlocking of cheat codes, different difficulty settings that add more objectives, etc. 

Zaku3

Zaku3

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, GameDadGrant said:

 

Yeah well we can still say fuck you to Nintendo for never localizing Mother 3. Those pricks. 

 

Yup.

 

Is there a fan translation?

LazyPiranha

LazyPiranha

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, imthesoldier said:

 

Given the situation, it wouldn't be the worst idea if they simply changed the face of Bond to the current actor...though Craig is officially done with Bond, so maybe it's in Bond limbo where it might be feasible today? Using Brosnan's Bond as a remaster/port would fit the narrative of reintroducing the game to younger fans who maybe did not play it back in the day, despite that Brosnan is no longer Bond himself (How I would love to see either Dalton, or Brosnan play a Bond villain) 

 

And before some folks mention how Goldeneye hasn't aged well, it's the framerate hasn't aged well. Sure the controls aren't what we use today, though Dual Analog was possible on the original N64 version using two controllers. So even coding dual analog wouldn't be needed. The gameplay of Goldeneye I think has overall stood the test of time because of its replayability, the unlocking of cheat codes, different difficulty settings that add more objectives, etc. 

 

Parts of it aged well, parts of it should have been more widely adopted, and other parts feel ancient.  The idea of higher difficulties adding newer, more varied objectives to a level is perfect and I wish more games did that.  Enemies being absurd bullet sponges and being caught in endless animation loops whenever they get shot so they look like they’re having a seizure have aged like room temperature milk.

imthesoldier

imthesoldier

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said:

 

Parts of it aged well, parts of it should have been more widely adopted, and other parts feel ancient.  The idea of higher difficulties adding newer, more varied objectives to a level is perfect and I wish more games did that.  Enemies being absurd bullet sponges and being caught in endless animation loops whenever they get shot so they look like they’re having a seizure have aged like room temperature milk.

 

I could've sworn that minus the bulletproof caps that get shot off when fired on, don't head shots do yield instant kills? But because of how the aim-assist works in Goldeneye, it doesn't really aim at the most effective areas for quick kills (game only has a crosshair when doing the fine-aiming anyway). Playing Goldeneye in either full mouse support (which does exist in mod form), or a modern dual analog would probably alleviate some of the bullet sponge concerns. 

 

If I'm honest, I love how the enemies will react to being hit, so I wouldn't change that part. 

GameDadGrant

GameDadGrant

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Zaku3 said:

 

Yup.

 

Is there a fan translation?

 

Not only is there a fan translation, but you can actually get the full game in English on an actual GBA cart. They are pretty cheap, too. I got one of those, bought it for $10 at a video game convention. I think it was the Midwest Gaming Classic, IIRC. 

gamer.tv

gamer.tv

Posted
Posted

Once I’ve finished Perfect Dark, I’ll go back and finish GoldenEye I think. It feels wrong that I’m 32, owned both games for a long time, but never actually finished either.

JPDunks4

JPDunks4

Posted
Posted

Jeff Grubb reported it was Nintendo that cancelled the original release.  And now that they are trying to do the N64 Online stuff they'd like more Rare titles, so are playing nice with Microsoft.

The def star

The def star

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, imthesoldier said:

 

I could've sworn that minus the bulletproof caps that get shot off when fired on, don't head shots do yield instant kills?

 

They do. Only bosses were bullet sponges. The regular enemies were always instant headshot kills.

  • 1 month later...
imthesoldier

imthesoldier

Posted
Posted
On 2/13/2022 at 11:04 AM, Keyser_Soze said:
goldeneye-1.jpg

A Goldeneye 007 remaster ‘could be revealed in the next few weeks’, it’s claimed | VGC

WWW.VIDEOGAMESCHRONICLE.COM
Goldeneye 007’s HD Remaster could be revealed in the next few weeks, according to a journalist, matching what VGC sources have been told.

 

 

@GameDadGrant

 

I'll believe it when I see it. 

 

That said, I desperately want it to be true, let alone the remaster be on both Xbox, AND Switch, plus cross-play, and all the business. Goldeneye is one of those many games that is unfortunately normally tied up in licensing issues, so if it does in fact release, it'd be a big deal. 

 

Same reason No One Lives Forever should be resurrected, and re-released for modern systems, but again, licensing issues. 

  • 3 months later...
silentbob

silentbob

Posted
Posted

So they’re gonna drop this free with their June 12th presentation, aren’t they? This leak coming out again a week before the presentation. I hope I’m right and that they got online multiplayer too. 🤞🏼 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...