Jump to content

Blizzard Suspends Hearthstone Player For Hong Kong Support, Pulls Prize Money


SimpleG

Recommended Posts

Taiwanese Hearthstone caster fired after Hong Kong controversy says he still doesn't know why

Blizzard has fired the casters from the stream as well -- even though it doesn't appear they did anything.

 

“Free Hong Kong” sign held during a collegiate Hearthstone stream

Quote

Yesterday, players from American University held a sign showing their support for the Hong Kong protests along with their disapproval of Blizzard during a live Hearthstone collegiate tournament. 

The sign read “Free Hong Kong Boycott Blizz” and was raised near the end of American University’s match against Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Within seconds, the stream promptly changed gears to have the sign removed from sight. The following tournament matches replaced player webcams with images of Hearthstone characters. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dre801 said:

They did what they had to do if they wanted to grow and thrive in China.  It sucks, but they bowed to their Chinese overlords and that shouldn't be a shock.

Absolutely, and now its time for us to do our jobs and keep our wallets closed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearthstone caster Brian Kibler quits in protest of Blizzard's ban of Blitzchung

Quote

I won’t pretend to understand either the intricacies of the geopolitical situation in China and Hong Kong or the full extent of Blizzard’s business interests there, but to me this penalty feels like it is deeply rooted in both. The heavy-handedness of it feels like someone insisted that Blizzard make an example of Blitzchung, not only to discourage others from similar acts in the future but also to appease those upset by the outburst itself.

 

That kind of appeasement is simply not something I can in good conscience be associated with. When I learned about the ruling, I reached out to Blizzard and informed them that I no longer feel comfortable casting the Grandmasters finals at BlizzCon. I will not be a smiling face on camera that tacitly endorses this decision. Unless something changes, I will have no involvement in Grandmasters moving forward.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://news.blizzard.com/en-us/blizzard/23185888/regarding-last-weekend-s-hearthstone-grandmasters-tournament

 

Quote

Hello Blizzard Community . . .

I want to take a few minutes to talk to all of you about the Hearthstone Grandmasters tournament this past weekend. On Monday, we made the decision to take action against a player named blitzchung and two shoutcasters after the player shared his views on what’s happening in Hong Kong on our official broadcast channel.
 

At Blizzard, our vision is “to bring the world together through epic entertainment.” And we have core values that apply here: Think Globally; Lead Responsibly; and importantly, Every Voice Matters, encouraging everybody to share their point of view. The actions that we took over the weekend are causing people to question if we are still committed to these values. We absolutely are and I will explain.

 

Our esports programs are an expression of our vision and our values. Esports exist to create opportunities for players from around the world, from different cultures, and from different backgrounds, to come together to compete and share their passion for gaming. It is extremely important to us to protect these channels and the purpose they serve: to bring the world together through epic entertainment, celebrate our players, and build diverse and inclusive communities.

 

As to how those values apply in this case:

 

First, our official esports tournament broadcast was used as a platform for a winner of this event to share his views with the world.

 

We interview competitors who are at the top of their craft to share how they feel. We want to experience that moment with them. Hearing their excitement is a powerful way to bring us together.

 

Over the weekend, blitzchung used his segment to make a statement about the situation in Hong Kong—in violation of rules he acknowledged and understood, and this is why we took action.

 

Every Voice Matters, and we strongly encourage everyone in our community to share their viewpoints in the many places available to express themselves. However, the official broadcast needs to be about the tournament and to be a place where all are welcome. In support of that, we want to keep the official channels focused on the game.

 

Second, what is the role of shoutcasters for these broadcasts?

 

We hire shoutcasters to amplify the excitement of the game. They elevate the watchability and help the esports viewing experience stay focused on the tournament and our amazing players.

 

Third, were our actions based on the content of the message?

 

Part of Thinking Globally, Leading Responsibly, and Every Voice Matters is recognizing that we have players and fans in almost every country in the world. Our goal is to help players connect in areas of commonality, like their passion for our games, and create a sense of shared community.

 

The specific views expressed by blitzchung were NOT a factor in the decision we made. I want to be clear: our relationships in China had no influence on our decision.

 

We have these rules to keep the focus on the game and on the tournament to the benefit of a global audience, and that was the only consideration in the actions we took.

 

If this had been the opposing viewpoint delivered in the same divisive and deliberate way, we would have felt and acted the same.

OK, what could Blizzard have done better, and where do we go from here?

Over the past few days, many players, casters, esports fans, and employees have expressed concerns about how we determined the penalties. We’ve had a chance to pause, to listen to our community, and to reflect on what we could have done better. In hindsight, our process wasn’t adequate, and we reacted too quickly.

 

We want to ensure that we maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all our players, and that our rules and processes are clear. All of this is in service of another important Blizzard value—Play Nice; Play Fair.

In the tournament itself blitzchung *played* fair. We now believe he should receive his prizing. We understand that for some this is not about the prize, and perhaps for others it is disrespectful to even discuss it. That is not our intention.

 

But playing fair also includes appropriate pre-and post-match conduct, especially when a player accepts recognition for winning in a broadcast. When we think about the suspension, six months for blitzchung is more appropriate, after which time he can compete in the Hearthstone pro circuit again if he so chooses. There is a consequence for taking the conversation away from the purpose of the event and disrupting or derailing the broadcast.

 

With regard to the casters, remember their purpose is to keep the event focused on the tournament. That didn’t happen here, and we are setting their suspension to six months as well.

 

Moving forward, we will continue to apply tournament rules to ensure our official broadcasts remain focused on the game and are not a platform for divisive social or political views.

One of our goals at Blizzard is to make sure that every player, everywhere in the world, regardless of political views, religious beliefs, race, gender, or any other consideration always feels safe and welcome both competing in and playing our games.

 

At Blizzard, we are always listening and finding ways to improve—it is part of our culture. Thank you for your patience with us as we continue to learn.

Sincerely,

J. Allen Brack
President of Blizzard Entertainment


i don't believe you anchorman GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's very interesting how the power of China is coming through in these entertainment venues rather than the more abstract economic political realm. 

 

It's a bold-faced lie that their relationship with China was not at play. It's absolutely the reason they did what they did. 

 

This is some bullshit. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SimpleG said:

 

Looks that way.  As an example, I can't imagine a native English speaker writing the sentence "We now believe he should receive his prizing."  (There are multiple other grammatical issues as well).

 

It's tough to understand Blizzard "taking the high road" on not offending anyone after they already declared that "We will always respect and defend the pride of our country."

 

3innty5cmjr31.jpg?width=906&auto=webp&s=

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...