Jump to content

The Water Wars Official Thread 💧🔪


Recommended Posts

USATSI_17326708-thomas-galvin.jpg?auto=c
THEINTERCEPT.COM

Thomas Galvin lobbied on behalf of a Saudi company soaking up Arizona’s groundwater. He is now mediating an ongoing water dispute in neighboring Maricopa County.

 

 

 

The Board of Supervisors oversees water rights disputes. 

 

 

The water wars are going to be lost to multinational corporate interests without a fight. 

  • Guillotine 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Uaarkson said:

Is there any aspect of human life the control of which won’t inevitably fall into multinational corporate hands? I can’t think of any.

 

The dystopian, megacorp-dominated future foretold by every single piece of cyberpunk-themed media is look more prophetic with each passing day.

  • True 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
44 minutes ago, Air_Delivery said:

I don't feel bad for those people at all. This is a heavily Republican area, so global warming is fake and let the free market work itself out.


Oh you want water? Gotta pay for it. Supply and demand after all.


Inhumane and incorrect post. Congrats on the double whammy of shittiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should I feel bad about people about people who moved to the middle of the desert crying about having to buy expensive water? The Southwest has been dealing with drought for 20 years now. Scientists have been warning for even longer about the effects of global warming and the impact on the region. If they choose to ignore or not believe it thats their problem. The market working itself out is Republican gospel which is what this area is primarily. Part of that is people getting fucked for poor decisions. Maybe the market will work itself out and people will stop building houses in stupid places.

 

Quote

To prevent unsustainable development in a desert state, Arizona passed a law in 1980 requiring subdivisions with six or more lots to show proof that they have a 100-year water supply. But developers in Rio Verde Foothills have been sidestepping the rule by carving larger parcels into sections with four or five houses each, creating the impression of a miniature suburbia, but one that did not need to legally prove it had water.

Quote

When some proposed forming their own self-funded water provider, other residents revolted, saying the idea would foist an expensive, freedom-stealing new arm of government on them. The idea collapsed. Other solutions, like allowing a larger water utility to serve the area, could be years off.

:cheers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. I'm constantly bothered by the lack of clarity that we ARE in the middle of climate change, a lot of area changes are already permanent. Framing shit into policy is technically correct, like a murder has a victim and a killer. At least set off the rational ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said:


We should all be better about sharing and distributing resources in a nation as wealthy as this one. Maybe you can pipe them water and they can airlift some awesome taquerias to Michigan. 

 

Living in a way that demands many extra resources is the opposite of being better about sharing and distribution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said:


We should all be better about sharing and distributing resources in a nation as wealthy as this one. Maybe you can pipe them water and they can airlift some awesome taquerias to Michigan. 

You can't pipe water that far, the amount you need is far too great, best to start implementing policies to assist in de-populating areas and massive desalinization plants in others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TyphoidHater said:

 

irrigation-canal_arizona_081822ap-matt-y
THEHILL.COM

California, Texas and Arizona scored the highest on a new ranking of nationwide water efficiency policies, while Mississippi, Alaska and the...

 

Screenshot_20230118-143153.png

 

This is a measure of water laws, not water use. And it's not factoring in the water usage of specific industries and how those industries exist in places like CA and AZ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2023 at 3:01 PM, finaljedi said:

Can’t we just stop allowing suburban sprawl subdivisions in the desert?

 

Homes in the desert (at least in Las Vegas) recycle all of the water that is used indoors.  But...Anything used outdoors such as in pools or for landscaping/lawns is lost to evaporation.  The homes aren't the problem - it's the stuff outside the homes that account for the loss of water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mclumber1 said:

 

Homes in the desert (at least in Las Vegas) recycle all of the water that is used indoors.  But...Anything used outdoors such as in pools or for landscaping/lawns is lost to evaporation.  The homes aren't the problem - it's the stuff outside the homes that account for the loss of water.

So Las Vegas doesn't use reclaimed water like Reno does for landscaping/lawns? Because you're not supposed to drink that water which is strictly used just for that purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...