Jump to content

Former Clinton advisor: Hillary will run in 2020


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CitizenVectron said:

I'd like to actually say that the entire culture of Americans rejecting "losers" in politics is a bad one. In almost all other western democracies a party will run a leader two or even three times before choosing another. I guess it's because in other democracies it's typically a battle of ideas when choosing your local rep (who then determines the leader) whereas the vote for President in the US is almost entirely based on a cult of personality and the idea that each one will be a saviour.

 

Hillary's already failed twice at becoming president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PaladinSolo said:

Yes because the party has soured on her big time.

 

The GOP was pretty damn sour on Trump, too.

 

As the primary nears, imagine the Dems start to panic about a crowded field with low name recognition.

 

But more importantly, imagine they start telling themselves the narrative, "Why take our chances with a wild card when Hillary won the popular vote and a fluke cost her in the Electoral College? Now Trump is less popular because he has a record that he didn't have in '16, that'll definitely net us whatever razor thin margin we needed in WI, PA, and MI."

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Chairslinger said:

 

The GOP was pretty damn sour on Trump, too.

 

As the primary nears, imagine the Dems start to panic about a crowded field with low name recognition.

 

But more importantly, imagine they start telling themselves the narrative, "Why take out chances with a wild card when Hillary won the popular vote and a fluke cost her in the Electoral College? Now Trump is less popular because he has a record that he didn't have in '16, that'll definitely net us whatever razor thin margin we needed in WI, PA, and MI."

 

 

 

Not really the same thing, Trump had his 30% of votes throughout the first half of the primaries, and won states because the other 14 idiots split the votes.  Clinton does not have a dedicated 30% of the party behind her, and he approval ratings have actually gotten worse since the election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

I would only count it as one failed attempt. I am not saying that she in particular should run again, but the US is really stupid in how it dumps its leaders. 

 

I don't see why failing to make it out of the primaries shouldn't count as a failed attempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

I'd like to actually say that the entire culture of Americans rejecting "losers" in politics is a bad one. In almost all other western democracies a party will run a leader two or even three times before choosing another. I guess it's because in other democracies it's typically a battle of ideas when choosing your local rep (who then determines the leader) whereas the vote for President in the US is almost entirely based on a cult of personality and the idea that each one will be a saviour.

 

I think we would see more losing candidates run again if they were younger when they lost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a nope from me.

 

Look, I don't doubt Hillary would be a better President than Trump, I also don't doubt there'd be people who died under Trump's administration that would be alive today if Hillary were President. But there are people out there (Democrat, Republican, independent) who see her as pure evil no matter what. 

 

And to watch the two of them debate again? Dear fucking God, kill me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MarSolo said:

This is a nope from me.

 

Look, I don't doubt Hillary would be a better President than Trump, I also don't doubt there'd be people who died under Trump's administration that would be alive today if Hillary were President. But there are people out there (Democrat, Republican, independent) who see her as pure evil no matter what. 

 

And to watch the two of them debate again? Dear fucking God, kill me. 

 

Every debate with Trump is going to be a shitshow, he can't talk policy without getting the wording from Fox and Friends

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The simple test is can the candidate kick Trump's ass in a debate, not out smart him, but make Trump look small. If they can find someone who can do that and come off as an authentic human, they'll win by chipping at the Trump cult and motivating the base to come out. Beto never hit Cruz directly in the debates despite multiple opportunities, he's authentic but I don't see him as being able to make Trump bleed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jwheel86 said:

The simple test is can the candidate kick Trump's ass in a debate, not out smart him, but make Trump look small. If they can find someone who can do that and come off as an authentic human, they'll win by chipping at the Trump cult and motivating the base to come out. Beto never hit Cruz directly in the debates despite multiple opportunities, he's authentic but I don't see him as being able to make Trump bleed. 

 

Gillum is amazing at this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hillary Launches Campaign To Raise $100 Million Or Else She’ll Run For President

 

Quote

CHAPPAQUA, NY—In a press conference announcing her plans for the 2020 election, Hillary Clinton told reporters she is launching a campaign Tuesday that will raise $100 million by the end of the year or else she will run for president. “I’m very excited to roll out my initiative to secure this full amount within seven weeks, and if it is not successful—let me be very clear on this—I will once more fill out the paperwork to run for president and submit it to the Federal Election Commission,” said Clinton, who stressed that she was “absolutely serious” about her new A Hundred Million Or Me campaign, describing the town halls and candidate meet-and-greets she would soon begin holding in Iowa and New Hampshire if donors came up even a penny short. “What I’m asking you to do is picture—and picture very vividly—the following things: Lawns plastered with ‘I’m With Her In 2020’ signs, continuous television ads showcasing my strenuous attempts to appear enthusiastic, entire news cycles once more given over to my use of a private email server as secretary of state. That’s one possibility. The other is you give me $100 million. Up to you.” At press time, sources confirmed Clinton had raised $17.6 billion in the first 45 seconds of the campaign.

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mithan said:

im sure they would blame russia again, not the fact everybody hates her.

 

She received more votes than Trump did, and received the second-highest vote total of all time in any election. Want to rephrase that? Literally no one but Obama has ever received more votes than her. If you think that everyone hated her, then that is only revealing your own projections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Mithan said:

im sure they would blame russia again, not the fact everybody hates her.

 

I really don't get what's so difficult for so many people to get their heads around with respect to it being perfectly possible for it to BOTH be true that she was a shitty candidate and that the Russians interfered to give Trump an extra push.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

She received more votes than Trump did, and received the second-highest vote total of all time in any election. Want to rephrase that? Literally no one but Obama has ever received more votes than her. If you think that everyone hated her, then that is only revealing your own projections.

Opinion polls had her as the most dislikable pol outside of trump. She is extremely disliked and has been for some time. How much of that is her and how much is part of a decades long right wing hit job is debatable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2018 at 3:46 PM, CitizenVectron said:

 

She received more votes than Trump did, and received the second-highest vote total of all time in any election. Want to rephrase that? Literally no one but Obama has ever received more votes than her. If you think that everyone hated her, then that is only revealing your own projections.

 

Yes?  And is that what I was commenting on?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2018 at 3:51 PM, Jason said:

 

I really don't get what's so difficult for so many people to get their heads around with respect to it being perfectly possible for it to BOTH be true that she was a shitty candidate and that the Russians interfered to give Trump an extra push.

 

Seems to me like you are reaching. 

 

Her comments calling 50% of American's deplorables, having high negatives, people wanting to make a "fuck you" vote to show how pissed they are at business as usual, and the FBI announcing they were re-investigating her then not and the electoral college had a much higher effect than 3 or 4 votes swayed by the Russians on Facebook.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mithan said:

 

Seems to me like you are reaching. 

 

Her comments calling 50% of American's deplorables, having high negatives, people wanting to make a "fuck you" vote to show how pissed they are at business as usual, and the FBI announcing they were re-investigating her then not and the electoral college had a much higher effect than 3 or 4 votes swayed by the Russians on Facebook.  

 

this is an even stupider take than when you said a few years ago that there was surely a coming housing collapse in Canada 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mithan said:

Her comments calling 50% of American's deplorables

 

50% of Trump supporters =/= 50% of Americans unless the entire country supports Trump.

 

And judging by the past 2 years, please tell me the errors there. Trump just called Democrats mobs, which is an actual third of America, and it gets cheered by every crowd with whom he speaks.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SilentWorld said:

 

this is an even stupider take than when you said a few years ago that there was surely a coming housing collapse in Canada 

If you bought a house in most areas in Canada in the last 5 years, you probably lost money.  Wait and see for Toronto and Vancouver.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SaysWho? said:

 

50% of Trump supporters =/= 50% of Americans unless the entire country supports Trump.

 

And judging by the past 2 years, please tell me the errors there. Trump just called Democrats mobs, which is an actual third of America, and it gets cheered by every crowd with whom he speaks.

So calling 50% of American's "deplorables" is correct? 

And no, I don't agree with Trump calling Democrats "mobs", but then again, I don't have a partisan view point like you do. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...