Jump to content

~*Official #COVID-19 Thread of Doom*~ Revenge of Omicron Prime


Recommended Posts

Hey remember how Trump supporters were pushing hydroxychloroquine as a potential saviour, and said the media was trying to knock it down to hurt Trump? Well, now that another drug (remdesivir) actually shows real promise...they are saying it's a fake.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/02/donald-trump-coronavirus-remdesivir-229765

 

Quote

Over three weeks ago, hydroxychloroquine was all the rage in MAGA world, despite flawed and scattered evidence about whether the drug could help cure coronavirus. Now there is another drug, remdesivir, with positive early scientific data.

 

Much of MAGA world wants little to do with it.

 

At first, it may seem like a head-scratching response. President Donald Trump’s base has been quick to trumpet any potential solutions to the coronavirus pandemic — especially those Trump himself promotes — regardless of the red flags from medical experts.

 

And here is why:

 

Quote

The unexpected reaction appears to stem from the differences in how the two drugs came into the public spotlight. Hydroxychloroquine bubbled up through the MAGA grassroots — little-known investors promoted it online, got on Fox News and suddenly the president was talking about it from the White House. Remdesivir’s progress came through a government-funded trial that had the blessing of Dr. Anthony Fauci, the bête noire of Trump hardliners who blame the government’s top infectious disease expert for undermining the president and causing unnecessary economic damage with his social-distancing guidelines.

 

Experts say the new one might work, and Trump isn't the one who championed it, therefore it is wrong.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Hey remember how Trump supporters were pushing hydroxychloroquine as a potential saviour, and said the media was trying to knock it down to hurt Trump? Well, now that another drug (remdesivir) actually shows real promise...they are saying it's a fake.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/02/donald-trump-coronavirus-remdesivir-229765

 

 

And here is why:

 

 

Experts say the new one might work, and Trump isn't the one who championed it, therefore it is wrong.

 

What have they got to lose?

 

:silly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Hey remember how Trump supporters were pushing hydroxychloroquine as a potential saviour, and said the media was trying to knock it down to hurt Trump? Well, now that another drug (remdesivir) actually shows real promise...they are saying it's a fake.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/02/donald-trump-coronavirus-remdesivir-229765

 

 

And here is why:

 

 

Experts say the new one might work, and Trump isn't the one who championed it, therefore it is wrong.

 

Gilead donated their entire supply for emergency use, which is great news.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news, the Republican Senate in Michigan has figured out a legal way to bypass the Democratic governor altogether and stop the emergency powers and restrictions!!

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/04/shirkey-petition-drive-limit-michigan-governor-emergency-powers-no-1-priority/3077087001/

 

Quote

Lansing — Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey backed the idea of a petition drive to limit Gov. Gretchen Whitmer's emergency powers during a radio interview Monday morning.

 

"I think it’s probably the No. 1 priority right now," Shirkey said in response to a question during an appearance on the "Your Defending Fathers" show. "That allows true representative government ... to take over."

 

Quote

Shirkey, R-Clarklake, was asked about the possibility of a citizen-led petition to change the 1945 law that allows the governor to use emergency powers without the approval of the Legislature and decide when the emergency ends without legislative approval. Whitmer has used the 1945 law to fight the novel coronavirus and has cited in arguing that she doesn't and shouldn't have to negotiate an end to a public health crisis.

 

Such a petition drive would require more than 340,000 signatures but could allow for a policy change to be enacted through the Legislature without the governor's support.

 

“I would look forward to starting that process, which I hope we do within the next couple weeks," Shirkey said. Monday.

 

Think they can find 340,000 suburban hog people to sign the petition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Good news, the Republican Senate in Michigan has figured out a legal way to bypass the Democratic governor altogether and stop the emergency powers and restrictions!!

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/04/shirkey-petition-drive-limit-michigan-governor-emergency-powers-no-1-priority/3077087001/

 

 

 

Think they can find 340,000 suburban hog people to sign the petition?

Yes. They can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Jose said:

 

False.

Proximate crowding isn't density.

22 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

I was referring more to how many people are crammed into public transit compared to many US cities. You're right that density (in terms of where you sleep) doesn't matter at all compared to how often you are physically close to people (which obviously can be affected by density, however, indirectly, as it relates to packed public areas).

 

18 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

 

A lone carrier is going to spread the virus to more people in a crowded stadium compared to a park.  

Stadiums and parks and the like is proximate crowding. This stuff can happen literally anywhere, like in line at a rural grocery store or suburban mall.

 

It's also not density as we know and define it. Italy has many multiples of our density and is doing far better than the US in it's response

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Good news, the Republican Senate in Michigan has figured out a legal way to bypass the Democratic governor altogether and stop the emergency powers and restrictions!!

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/04/shirkey-petition-drive-limit-michigan-governor-emergency-powers-no-1-priority/3077087001/

 

 

 

Think they can find 340,000 suburban hog people to sign the petition?

If my facebook feed is any indication, yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Good news, the Republican Senate in Michigan has figured out a legal way to bypass the Democratic governor altogether and stop the emergency powers and restrictions!!

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/04/shirkey-petition-drive-limit-michigan-governor-emergency-powers-no-1-priority/3077087001/

 

 

 

Think they can find 340,000 suburban hog people to sign the petition?

 

 

Mr. and Mrs. Bananas, Humphrey Boa-gart, and Snowball I all think the stay at home orders are tyranny, so they got a good shot.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Proximate crowding isn't density.

 

Stadiums and parks and the like is proximate crowding. This stuff can happen literally anywhere, like in line at a rural grocery store or suburban mall.

 

It's also not density as we know and define it. Italy has many multiples of our density and is doing far better than the US in it's response

 

Proximate crowding isn't going to happen more often in a dense city? C'mon dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jose said:

 

Proximate crowding isn't going to happen more often in a dense city? C'mon dude.

 

I get what he is trying to say - proximity crowding isn't solely dependent on population density, and that is true. It is, however, more common in dense areas compared to sparse areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

I get what he is trying to say - proximity crowding isn't solely dependent on population density, and that is true. It is, however, more common in dense areas compared to sparse areas.

 

That's not what he said though. He said population density is irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

I get what he is trying to say - proximity crowding isn't solely dependent on population density, and that is true. It is, however, more common in dense areas compared to sparse areas.

If there's one grocery store per ten thousand people, it doesn't matter if it is in rural Idaho or NYC. It's still one per ten thousand. Some of the worst per capita outbreaks are in places with a lot of proximate crowding--meat packing facilities, nursing homes, prisons--that are often in communities that are not dense. This is why when a state goes into lockdown, the rules are consistent throughout the very diverse state, and not one set of rules for cities and another for rural areas. No large gatherings, social distancing, stay at home, etc. In NYC, if we ran many more buses and trains than we normally do (so we wouldn't have to crowd) and enforced social distancing and masks, we could still have a somewhat safe and functional transit sustem that reduces the chance of transmission!

 

And if actual density mattered, density as in persons per square mile, the US would be doing fantastic while Western Europe and South Korea would be completely overrun. This simply isn't the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Proximate crowding isn't density.

 

Stadiums and parks and the like is proximate crowding. This stuff can happen literally anywhere, like in line at a rural grocery store or suburban mall.

 

It's also not density as we know and define it. Italy has many multiples of our density and is doing far better than the US in it's response


Frequency of crowding events matters, man. I know you love cities with all your heart but densely populated areas give way more opportunities to be in close proximity to an infected person. It’s unquestionably more difficult to ease the spread in such environments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sblfilms said:

Frequency of crowding events matters, man. I know you love cities with all your heart but densely populated areas give way more opportunities to be in close proximity to an infected person. It’s unquestionably more difficult to ease the spread in such environments.

 

If this was about population density than Staten Island wouldn't be one of the hardest-hit areas in NYC.

 

nyc-covid-cases-ht-jef-200401_hpEmbed_13

 

Likewise, Long Island, that suburban Hasidic community in NY, and New Jersey would not be hotspots if this was just about density.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

 

If this was about population density than Staten Island wouldn't be one of the hardest-hit areas in NYC.

 

nyc-covid-cases-ht-jef-200401_hpEmbed_13

 

Likewise, Long Island, that suburban Hasidic community in NY, and New Jersey would not be hotspots if this was just about density.


Good thing nobody said it’s just about density. Density provides a more complicated set of problems. This is not even up for debate :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Density matters for raw numbers, but when you adjust for population the rates of infection are just as high or higher in a lot of rural areas, some because of prisons, some because of plants, some because of outbreaks from a single event like a funeral in Albany GA.  Only 2 NY counties are in the 10 highest rates of infection.  Basically people congregate everywhere into large gatherings regardless of density, they just travel further to do it.

 

Look at the Nordic countries, Denmark's density is almost 10 times higher than Finland, and Norway, while 5 times Sweden's but its only twice the rate of death of Finland and Norway, while its 1/3 of Sweden's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discussions here always end up on the extremes and it can be very frustrating. Just because population density isn't irrelevant does not necessarily mean it is the number one factor. I really have to say this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PaladinSolo said:

Density matters for raw numbers, but when you adjust for population the rates of infection are just as high or higher in a lot of rural areas, some because of prisons, some because of outbreaks from a single event like a funeral in Albany GA.

 

That's all true.


But what is also generally true is that in densely populated areas, you'll tend to have events or periods where you'll pack more people into a small area, much more often.

 

A person who attends a church once per week probably has a lower chance of being infected than a person who rides the subway twice a day Monday through Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

 

If this was about population density than Staten Island wouldn't be one of the hardest-hit areas in NYC.

 

nyc-covid-cases-ht-jef-200401_hpEmbed_13

 

Likewise, Long Island, that suburban Hasidic community in NY, and New Jersey would not be hotspots if this was just about density.

Are people really getting in there and testing the Hasidic community? I honestly don't know, my main experience with them was being completely ignored walking through town except on whatever days they would come up to me, cigarettes in hand, and "ask" me to light them without actually saying anything to me. :p 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sblfilms said:


Good thing nobody said it’s just about density. Density provides a more complicated set of problems. This is not even up for debate :lol:

 

Agreed on all points. I was especially perplexed when he said if this was just about density, NJ would not have such high numbers. NJ literally has the highest population density in the country!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Emperor Diocletian II said:

My view of  evaluating the applicability of all data models -- including those that I have developed! -- is  not so much how "accurate" they are, but rather how "less inaccurate" they are!

God, that's a great quote - I really outdid myself with that one!

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...