Jump to content

Joe Biden beats Donald Trump, officially making Trump a one-term twice impeached, twice popular-vote losing president


Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Anathema- said:

The native American thing is silly. It's a "controversy" because it's easy to have an opinion on and sharing that opinion only serves a purpose of sowing mistrust among people who were already inclined to mistrust her and the justifications to make it out to be a concern over the kind of administrator she'd be are pretty strained. It's embarrassing for her and kind of absurd but I don't understand why it would affect anyone's vote except in maybe a tiebreaker sense. There's no there there. 

 

This is kind of where I am too. If this is the biggest knock against Warren she's a great candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SaysWho? said:

From the Washington Post:

 

But she is relatively untested when it comes to raising the kind of money needed for a campaign, as well as appealing to minorities and winning over liberals. She has not come out in favor of Medicare-for-all, for example...

 

Aaaaand we're done here unless she explicitly comes out in favor of MFA.  This is now the basic "litmus test" for any Democratic candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SFLUFAN said:

From the Washington Post:

 

But she is relatively untested when it comes to raising the kind of money needed for a campaign, as well as appealing to minorities and winning over liberals. She has not come out in favor of Medicare-for-all, for example...

 

Aaaaand we're done here unless she explicitly comes out in favor of MFA.  This is now the basic "litmus test" for any Democratic candidate.

 

But she's likable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SFLUFAN said:

From the Washington Post:

 

But she is relatively untested when it comes to raising the kind of money needed for a campaign, as well as appealing to minorities and winning over liberals. She has not come out in favor of Medicare-for-all, for example...

 

Aaaaand we're done here unless she explicitly comes out in favor of MFA.  This is now the basic "litmus test" for any Democratic candidate.

The interesting thing will be how the various candidates define Medicare for All and if that definition passes the test. I don't think Public Option will, but Single Payer might go too far. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

 

Obama laughed and then commuted thousands of non-violent drug offenses. Not really that big of a deal unless laughing meant that someone who sold pot died of measles.

 

I'm more confused as to why Democrats make these kinds of decisions when often they reverse it later and sponsor positive drug reform (she has an A from NORML, for example). Can they not read the tea leaves when polling and national momentum indicate otherwise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

 

Obama laughed and then commuted thousands of non-violent drug offenses. Not really that big of a deal unless laughing meant that someone who sold pot died of measles.

 

I'm more confused as to why Democrats make these kinds of decisions when often they reverse it later and sponsor positive drug reform (she has an A from NORML, for example). Can they not read the tea leaves when polling and national momentum indicate otherwise?

 

Democrats have been obsessed for decades with looking "weak" on issues, and think that looking "strong" with appeal to moderates. That explains almost every dumb stance they have taken on issues such as drugs or gay marriage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If she had a change of heart, I believe it. Meanwhile: 

https://www.newsweek.com/michael-bloomberg-marijuana-addictive-legalization-stupidest-thing-ever-1302068

Quote

 

Former New York City Mayor—and potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidate—Michael Bloomberg called efforts to legalize marijuana "perhaps the stupidest thing anybody has ever done."

 

Speaking at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, on Tuesday, Bloomberg said on the subject, according to WBNG-TV:

 

"We have a different kind of problem in America, for example. Last year, in 2017, 72,000 Americans [overdosed] on drugs. In 2018, more people than that are OD-ing on drugs, have OD'd on drugs. And today, incidentally, we are trying to legalize another addictive narcotic, which is perhaps the stupidest thing anybody has ever done. We’ve got to fight that, and that’s another thing that Bloomberg Philanthropies will work on it in public health."

 

 

I can understand having concerns about commercializing marijuana, but damn this guy is so out of touch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RedSoxFan9 said:

 

 

Honestly, if the minimum age to run for president is 35 (and realistically 10 years older than that) every single candidate will likely have supported a policy in the past that the mid-20s woke liberals would now consider disqualifying.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ThreePi said:

 

Honestly, if the minimum age to run for president is 35 (and realistically 10 years older than that) every single candidate will likely have supported a policy in the past that the mid-20s woke liberals would now consider disqualifying.

 

Quote

Sanders supports banning assault weapons, universal federal background checks, and closing the gun show loophole.[288][289][290] In 1990, Sanders was supported by the NRA in his bid to become a U.S. Representative in exchange for opposing both the competing campaign of Peter Smith, who had reversed his stance on firearm restrictions, and waiting periods for handgun purchases.[291] In 1993, while a U.S. Representative, he voted against the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (which established background checks and wait periods), and in 2005 he voted for legislation that gave gun manufacturers legal immunity against claims of negligence, but as of 2016 he has said that he would support repealing that law.[92] In 1996, he voted against additional funding to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for research on issues related to firearms, but in 2016 he called for an increase in CDC funding for the study of gun violence.[92]

 

How about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...