Jump to content

Irish Supreme Court says Subway bread isn't bread, actually confection


Recommended Posts

5090.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=8
WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Judge finds that sugar content of US chain’s sandwiches exceeds stipulated limit and they should thus be classified as confectionery

 

Quote

In a judgment published on Tuesday, the court ruled that the bread served at Subway, the US chain that hawks giant sandwiches in 110 countries and territories, could not in fact be defined as bread because of its high sugar content.

 

The ruling followed an appeal by Bookfinders Ltd, Subway’s Irish franchisee. The company had argued that the bread used in Subway sandwiches counted as a staple food and was consequently exempt from VAT.

 

However, as the court pointed out, Ireland’s Value-Added Tax Act of 1972 draws a distinction between staple foods – bread, tea, coffee, cocoa, milk and “preparations or extracts of meat or eggs” – and “more discretionary indulgences” such as ice-cream, chocolate, pastries, crisps, popcorn and roasted nuts.

 

The clincher was the act’s strict provision that the amount of sugar in bread “shall not exceed 2% of the weight of flour included in the dough”.

Subway’s bread, however, contains five times as much sugar.
Or, as the supreme court put it: “In this case, there is no dispute that the bread supplied by Subway in its heated sandwiches has a sugar content of 10% of the weight of the flour included in the dough.”

 

02RqYBv.png

 

I didn't know the bread and a Big Mac bun had that much sugar in it. Huh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SaysWho? changed the title to Irish Supreme Court says Subway bread isn't bread, actually confection
5 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:
5090.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=8
WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Judge finds that sugar content of US chain’s sandwiches exceeds stipulated limit and they should thus be classified as confectionery

 

 

02RqYBv.png

 

I didn't know the bread and a Big Mac bun had that much sugar in it. Huh.

It is American. What else was it going to have in it, healthy, non-addictive shit? Where's the medical debt in that!?

 

spacer.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

Digestive Biscuit?  WTF is that?  Isn't that what Robocop has to eat? 

 

Bowl_of_digestive_biscuits.jpg
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

 

Quote

A digestive biscuit, sometimes described as a sweet-meal biscuit, is a semi-sweet biscuit that originated in Scotland. The digestive was first developed in 1839 by two Scottish doctors to aid digestion. The term "digestive" is derived from the belief that they had antacid properties due to the use of sodium bicarbonate when they were first developed.

 

  • Guillotine 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TwinIon said:

Great headline.

 

 

Does the US tie tax rates to nutrition in any real way? Seems like a fine idea. Of course, any time the state does anything to make us healthier there's a huge pushback, so I'd kinda be surprised if there is.

 

lol

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...