Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 guy with subpoena power for report clutches pearls over non-release of report Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarSolo Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 It amazes me how bad these people are at covering things up. Like, if they had just released the report to Congress as it was, there would not be this level of scrutiny over the report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Remember how the DOJ was supposed to have learned from Jim Comey's press conference? Oops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 9 minutes ago, osxmatt said: Remember how the DOJ was supposed to have learned from Jim Comey's press conference? Oops. Barr actually criticized that press conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarSolo Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 It takes balls to be a shittier Attorney General than Jeff Sessions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 17 minutes ago, Jason said: Barr actually criticized that press conference. For not indicting Hillary? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 I missed the press conference, but apparently Barr said he disagreed with some of Mueller's conclusions or something of the sort. Also, Rosenstein looked like half of the American Gothic Painting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 so he sucked off trump for a few min then ran? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 19 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: I missed the press conference, but apparently Barr said he disagreed with some of Mueller's conclusions or something of the sort. Also, Rosenstein looked like half of the American Gothic Painting. It was an absolute joke. It may be worth the 20 minutes, just for the sheer lunacy of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSpreader Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 It's all insider bullshit, we don't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 1 minute ago, Jason said: He tweeted this literally seconds after Barr's presser was over. I got the push notification as Barr was exiting the podium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 35 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: I missed the press conference, but apparently Barr said he disagreed with some of Mueller's conclusions or something of the sort. Also, Rosenstein looked like half of the American Gothic Painting. If Barr disagrees with Mueller, then Mueller DID find evidence of crimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 "In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation as he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability. Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, osxmatt said: "In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context. President Trump faced an unprecedented situation as he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability. Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion. And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims. And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 18 minutes ago, Jason said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, osxmatt said: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf It doesn't appear to be a searchable pdf. That sucks. I'm lazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, osxmatt said: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf lol, it's not able to be ctrl-f'ed? Why do I feel like that's not an accident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatoneshere Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 I don't have time to read it myself for awhile, someone give me bullet points and shit as we find things out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slug Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said: I don't have time to read it myself for awhile, someone give me bullet points and shit as we find things out. Well there was a charging decision as to [REDACTED] then they detail a potential violation of section 1030 (Computer fraud) by none other than [REDACTED] and then they detail false statements and obstruction of the investigation by [REDACTED]. So yeah it's a pretty good read so far. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 NO COLLUSION! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Jason said: This could easily be related to Rodger stones trial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatoneshere Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Well, I see this has already become the shit show we all knew it would become. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 18, 2019 Share Posted April 18, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.