Jump to content

CA high capacity magazine ban declared unconstitutional


Recommended Posts

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-blocks-california-s-ban-high-capacity-magazines-over-2nd-n989136

 

I'm sure this will be appealed by the state and the 9th circuit will likely side with the state at least if they do en banc hearing but as someone that works for a firearms wholesaler I can tell you at the moment mags are absolutely flooding into CA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, elbobo said:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-blocks-california-s-ban-high-capacity-magazines-over-2nd-n989136

 

I'm sure this will be appealed by the state and the 9th circuit will likely side with the state at least if they do en banc hearing but as someone that works for a firearms wholesaler I can tell you at the moment mags are absolutely flooding into CA

 

I've read that a strategy that California may take is to not appeal - because if they appeal there is a greater chance that it could get taken up by SCOTUS.  Based on the current makeup of the Supreme Court this could result in not only California having to allow standard capacity magazines, but every single other state that currently restricts magazines to 10 rounds. California might end up "taking one for the team" so the other 8 states that have magazine restrictions can keep their bans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mclumber1 said:

 Including the police.

Also true. 

 

Just now, Slug said:

The argument comes on one's definition of "high capacity".  Personally I consider 10-15 round magazines to be standard capacity.

More than one round. :p Dream big. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Slug said:

The argument comes on one's definition of "high capacity".  Personally I consider 10-15 round magazines to be standard capacity.

 

My personal take is that if you need more than 10 rounds to get the job done, you're either not that great with your weapon or you're in a situation where extra n bullets aren't going to save you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Slug said:

The argument comes on one's definition of "high capacity".  Personally I consider 10-15 round magazines to be standard capacity.

It used to be until we started fighting against AKs in Vietnam that had in some cases 100 round mags. We extended ours in response, ours were 20 up to that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Anathema- said:

So now they're trying to pretend the 2nd amendment is about home protection? Judicial activism at its finest.

 

It isn’t new, it is what Heller was complaining about in his 2008 win at SCOTUS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sblfilms said:

 

It isn’t new, it is what Heller was complaining about in his 2008 win at SCOTUS.

 

Yeah but even as the 2nd can be strained to read a protection for individual ownership there's clearly no protection against regulations in the name of home defense.

 

The biggest problem of Heller is how it answered a question that wasn't being asked and is one of the clearest examples of judicial activism already, even when agreeing with the ultimate conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...