Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
legend

PC Tech Radeon VII: Competitive with 2080; $699

Recommended Posts

Competitive performance at similar prices with questionable availability. Sounds like AMD's back on top!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No ray tracing will hurt it, me thinks. But, hopefully this makes nVidia use more realistic pricing (they won’t, but, one can dream, god damn it!!!!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not bad considering no one originally thought this chip was going to be brought to consumers. The pricing sucks, but 16 gigs of HBM isn't cheap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, RedSoxFan9 said:

will it keep my office warm in the winter?

My Vega 64 and OC'ed 6700k do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it can turn in beastly performance without causing a brownout and heating up a room, cool.  Hell V64 was comparable to a 1080 but took more juice and put out more heat to arrive at that performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Spork3245 said:

No ray tracing will hurt it, me thinks. But, hopefully this makes nVidia use more realistic pricing (they won’t, but, one can dream, god damn it!!!!)

 

No DXR won't hurt it at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Reputator said:

 

No DXR won't hurt it at all.

 

At a $700 price point (same as a base RTX 2080, if you can find one), I largely disagree in terms of sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't the RTX upped in base price now? Even Nvidia's site has them at $799, pretty much only the pre-orders got them at the lower price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

 

At a $700 price point (same as a base RTX 2080, if you can find one), I largely disagree in terms of sales.

 

How can you disagree in terms of sales if we have no sales numbers yet (or likely ever)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Reputator said:

 

How can you disagree in terms of sales if we have no sales numbers yet (or likely ever)?

 

4 hours ago, Spork3245 said:

No ray tracing will hurt it, me thinks. But, hopefully this makes nVidia use more realistic pricing (they won’t, but, one can dream, god damn it!!!!)

3

 

ie: speculatively. I have no idea what you thought I was referencing.

Why am I speculating that lack of Ray Tracing could potentially hurt this card selling? Because it’s the same price and performance of one with RT, and at the $700 range people tend to want to be able to check every graphics option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there needs to be a compelling case for DXR first for those sales to come, and even with the patches and driver improvements, BFV isn't really giving it. I'll reserve full judgement until Metro Exodus comes out, but I don't think this is the generation for ray tracing. Bring on the Shader Model 3.0 comparisons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Reputator said:

Well there needs to be a compelling case for DXR first for those sales to come, and even with the patches and driver improvements, BFV isn't really giving it. I'll reserve full judgement until Metro Exodus comes out, but I don't think this is the generation for ray tracing. Bring on the Shader Model 3.0 comparisons.

 

Fair enough, but at that point why not just get a cheaper last gen card and save? 1080 Ti cards are going for around $500 now.

And again, for the same price, wouldn't most high-end gamers preference the one with Ray-Tracing available? If the AMD card out-priced the RTX 2080, I would see the argument for it, certainly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

You linked the same thing as mike lol.

The gigabyte is also $699.

 

I returned my EVGA when it first launched due to issues with it. When I went to purchase another brand none of them were $699 anymore, they all jumped $100 in price. Good to see some came back down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Spork3245 said:

 

Fair enough, but at that point why not just get a cheaper last gen card and save? 1080 Ti cards are going for around $500 now.

 

I'd assume there's a power consumption improvement going to 7nm but I wouldn't criticize anyone for going that route.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nokt said:

You linked the same thing as mike lol.

The gigabyte is also $699.

 

I returned my EVGA when it first launched due to issues with it. When I went to purchase another brand none of them were $699 anymore, they all jumped $100 in price. Good to see some came back down.

 

I skipped right by Mike's post :blush: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is basically 1080ti performance at 1080ti launch price. Unfortunately that was almost two years ago.

It's nice to see them come out with a 4k capable card, but I already spent $700 on a 1080ti a year and a half ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Spork3245 said:

No ray tracing will hurt it, me thinks. But, hopefully this makes nVidia use more realistic pricing (they won’t, but, one can dream, god damn it!!!!)

 

4 hours ago, Reputator said:

 

No DXR won't hurt it at all.

 

 

Well, I'm pretty niche, but Nvidia's Tensor Cores and RT cores means unless there is a big surprise with these AMD cards, I'm going Nvidia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, legend said:

 

 

 

Well, I'm pretty niche, but Nvidia's Tensor Cores and RT cores means unless there is a big surprise with these AMD cards, I'm going Nvidia.

 

Yea, at the same price with the same performance, getting the card with less features doesn’t make sense to me unless you have something against one of the brands. That’s my point as to why I think lack of RT will hurt it from a sales perspective - at $700 it’s educated PC gamers buying it, not random schmucks looking to maybe get into PC gaming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

 

Yea, at the same price with the same performance, getting the card with less features doesn’t make sense to me unless you have something against one of the brands. That’s my point as to why I think lack of RT will hurt it from a sales perspective - at $700 it’s educated PC gamers buying it, not random schmucks looking to maybe get into PC gaming.

 

The price will hurt it more than features. AMD had a chance to really undercut NVIDIA, and they didn't, which is unfortunate given how long it took AMD to reach this performance level. I have to imagine it has something to do with that expensive HBM2 memory (gee, isn't that a familiar problem?) but then why in the hell did they need 16GB of it? I mean, I already know the answer, and it has more to do with hitting the bandwidth target they were aiming at, but without giving AMD a significant advantage, 1TB/s is more a bragging point than anything else.

 

A month ago I'd call this a big win because of all the 4k Freesync monitors out there needing a card that can power them, but NVIDIA just stole that thunder too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Reputator said:

 

The price will hurt it more than features. AMD had a chance to really undercut NVIDIA, and they didn't, which is unfortunate given how long it took AMD to reach this performance level. I have to imagine it has something to do with that expensive HBM2 memory (gee, isn't that a familiar problem?) but then why in the hell did they need 16GB of it? I mean, I already know the answer, and it has more to do with hitting the bandwidth target they were aiming at, but without giving AMD a significant advantage, 1TB/s is more a bragging point than anything else.

 

A month ago I'd call this a big win because of all the 4k Freesync monitors out there needing a card that can power them, but NVIDIA just stole that thunder too.

 

I already stated that regarding pricing. The issue is the same performance at the same price, with less features. AMD needed to undercut the 2080s base MSRP by at least $100 to make the card appealing to its target consumer. nVidia can likely even remove the current free game bundles and do a $50-$100 price drop on the 2080 to make the R7 be completely dead in the water.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

I already stated that regarding pricing. The issue is the same performance at the same price, with less features. AMD needed to undercut the 2080s base MSRP by at least $100 to make the card appealing to its target consumer. nVidia can likely even remove the current free game bundles and do a $50-$100 price drop on the 2080 to make the R7 be completely dead in the water.

 

I think AMD thought they were undercutting the 2080 by $100, without actually looking at reality.

 

A lot of people are disappointed this wasn't Navi. I'm a bit more on the lukewarm side. I like the idea of a refresh, and I don't think the industry has seen a REAL refresh in the old sense of the word for a very long time. This is a die shrink of the existing architecture, with a few enhancements and a decent little bump in speed, before they take a big plunge on the new process with a new architecture.

 

It's smart in a way, and it should be noted that while NVIDIA started a sort of "beta" program with support for Freesync, from their own booth at CES, the results were hit or miss.

 

 

And they're basically leaving the testing in the hands of users, needless to say without much incentive to improve how well Freesync monitors work on their cards with much expediency. This is probably why Jensen recently made comments about how Freesync "doesn't work". If you want GOOD support for your 4k Freesync monitor, you'll probably still need to buy a Radeon VII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Reputator said:

 

I think AMD thought they were undercutting the 2080 by $100, without actually looking at reality.

 

... what? They thought they were undercutting it by releasing it at the same msrp and not checking vendors to see the various brands selling the 2080 for said msrp...? .... what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

 

... what? They thought they were undercutting it by releasing it at the same msrp and not checking vendors to see the various brands selling the 2080 for said msrp...? .... what?

 

Well the FE MSRP is $100 higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Reputator said:

 

Well the FE MSRP is $100 higher.

 

The FE has nothing to do with current MSRP unless you’re trying to say that AMD is incompetent and REALLY bad at being a business?

I really do not understand the argument you’re attempting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Spork3245 said:

 

The FE has nothing to do with current MSRP unless you’re trying to say that AMD is incompetent and REALLY bad at being a business?

I really do not understand the argument you’re attempting.

 

No that actually is my argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Reputator said:

@Spork3245 Also you kept editing your posts and I didn't see that you had already made some of the points that I made later.

 

The point about price was made in what you quoted. “Same price for the same performance, getting the card with less features doesn’t make sense” :p 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Spork3245 said:

 

The point about price was made in what you quoted. “Same price for the same performance, getting the card with less features doesn’t make sense” :p 

 

Kinda, but the more nuanced part:

 

"And again, for the same price, wouldn't most high-end gamers preference the one with Ray-Tracing available? If the AMD card out-priced the RTX 2080, I would see the argument for it, certainly. "

 

I didn't see. But regardless, I added a lot more detail to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...