Jump to content

Canadian Insurrection | UPDATE - Oversight commission rules invocation of Emergency Act by Trudeau was warranted


Recommended Posts

Seems pretty clear that Canadian police are being chud pilled like their American counterparts. Our decaying corpse of a body politic will simply overwhelm Canada by sheer size, no matter what the majority of the Canadian people want. 

 

but my take is that all State Police forces unless militantly anti partisan will fall to support conservatism and conservatives (if not explicitly than implicitly) by default because they inherently are reactionary supporters of the petit bourgeoisie whose property rights they uphold by default and by definition. (And it is clear that these are the people funding and acting on this protest)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • CitizenVectron changed the title to Jan 29 Canadian Insurrection. UPDATE - Ambassador Bridge cleared, Feds consider Emergencies Act

Each time I see a “it’s not about mandates” tweet, I’m like…no kidding. The spark that ignites the fire can be anything. When you look at the protests by the indigenous people in regards to pipelines being built, they don’t stop at issue of the pipeline. Many other issues end up being raised and they typically revolve around broader dissatisfaction with the government. 
 

To these protestors, the vaccine mandate is a symptom of the broader issues they have with the government and it is completely expected that those issues will surface as the protests rage on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, sblfilms said:

Each time I see a “it’s not about mandates” tweet, I’m like…no kidding. The spark that ignites the fire can be anything. When you look at the protests by the indigenous people in regards to pipelines being built, they don’t stop at issue of the pipeline. Many other issues end up being raised and they typically revolve around broader dissatisfaction with the government. 
 

To these protestors, the vaccine mandate is a symptom of the broader issues they have with the government and it is completely expected that those issues will surface as the protests rage on.


The difference between those two examples is that the pipeline is not a false pretext to the reason that they’re protesting, nor is it sucker bait to get people to say they’re in favor of the protest generally while being absolutely opposed to the larger goal.  If the pipelines were ok’ yellered behind the woodshed and it was genuine, the pipeline protest would actually stop.  Yes, the people protesting would still have grievances that weren’t even touched upon, but the overwhelming majority of them would be satisfied with the outcome of their protest and leave.  
 

This is not the same thing.  Trudeau could say “le fuck it” and remove the mandate this very moment, and these fuckers would not leave.  They aren’t truly anti-mandate protestors because the mandates always were at best a palatable window dressing to their true goals which is effectively minority rule over federal government through force.  Even they aren’t so far gone to realize that “trucker convoy to illegally depose a democratically elected government” is going to get zero fucking sympathy from anyone but the loons.  

  • Guillotine 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, LazyPiranha said:


The difference between those two examples is that the pipeline is not a false pretext to the reason that they’re protesting, nor is it sucker bait to get people to say they’re in favor of the protest generally while being absolutely opposed to the larger goal.  If the pipelines were ok’ yellered behind the woodshed and it was genuine, the pipeline protest would actually stop.  Yes, the people protesting would still have grievances that weren’t even touched upon, but the overwhelming majority of them would be satisfied with the outcome of their protest and leave.  
 

This is not the same thing.  Trudeau could say “le fuck it” and remove the mandate this very moment, and these fuckers would not leave.  They aren’t truly anti-mandate protestors because the mandates always were at best a palatable window dressing to their true goals which is effectively minority rule over federal government through force.  Even they aren’t so far gone to realize that “trucker convoy to illegally depose a democratically elected government” is going to get zero fucking sympathy from anyone but the loons.  


The notion that the opposition to vaccine mandates is a false pretense is speculative on your part. It could be true of some, none, or all. 
 

In fact the entirety of your post is purely speculative about what people would do.

 

:shrug:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LazyPiranha said:


The difference between those two examples is that the pipeline is not a false pretext to the reason that they’re protesting, nor is it sucker bait to get people to say they’re in favor of the protest generally while being absolutely opposed to the larger goal.  If the pipelines were ok’ yellered behind the woodshed and it was genuine, the pipeline protest would actually stop.  Yes, the people protesting would still have grievances that weren’t even touched upon, but the overwhelming majority of them would be satisfied with the outcome of their protest and leave.  
 

This is not the same thing.  Trudeau could say “le fuck it” and remove the mandate this very moment, and these fuckers would not leave.  They aren’t truly anti-mandate protestors because the mandates always were at best a palatable window dressing to their true goals which is effectively minority rule over federal government through force.  Even they aren’t so far gone to realize that “trucker convoy to illegally depose a democratically elected government” is going to get zero fucking sympathy from anyone but the loons.  

They are angry about the mandates.  They are ALSO angry about Trudeau.  Blocking the CN railway 2 years ago was just as justified as blocking the Ambassador bridge (i.e. none).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Air_Delivery said:

Have they articulated why they are angry at Trudeau other than mandates?

He is a figurehead for all of the frustrations people have endured in Canada over the last 2 years.  (Our lockdowns have been among the most strict in the western world.)

 

Then there's carbon taxes, lack of action on pipelines -- and all of the conspiracy theory bullshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bc-border-protest-sunday.png?w=720&h=379
GLOBALNEWS.CA

A small number of protesters camped out at the Pacific Highway border crossing overnight, with several vehicles and trailers parked in the middle of Highway 15 Sunday morning.

It's time for a national state of emergency to be called.  It's time...  Or, maybe...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

He is a figurehead for all of the frustrations people have endured in Canada over the last 2 years.  (Our lockdowns have been among the most strict in the western world.)

 

Then there's carbon taxes, lack of action on pipelines -- and all of the conspiracy theory bullshit.

So they are morons who are against reasonable things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...