Jason Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 The decision likely sets up a Supreme Court showdown over the future of online speech 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclumber1 Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 I shall go (re)petition to have my permaban lifted from r/conservative. Those chuds can't keep me down! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 Chuddiest chud court chuds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 Well, this is going to suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 How would that even work? I shudder to think what the repercussions of this would be... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 2 minutes ago, marioandsonic said: How would that even work? I shudder to think what the repercussions of this would be... No idea, but the only upside is that it might lead to the demise of the major social media platforms! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 7 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: No idea, but the only upside is that it might lead to the demise of the major social media platforms! Letthemfight.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jwheel86 Posted September 16, 2022 Share Posted September 16, 2022 1 hour ago, mclumber1 said: I shall go (re)petition to have my permaban lifted from r/conservative. Those chuds can't keep me down! Unless I missed it but they oddly aren't talking about this, dog caught the car moment? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 What fucking nonsense. The constitution doesn’t give companies the right to censor speech on their platform, but it doesn’t not give them the right either. The first amendment limits government regulated speech. Not corporate regulated speech. Not privately regulated speech either. are the courts going to go after organizations that refuse to publish or print a story because the editors and management do not like or agree with the content? does this apply to comments sections and scam posts by people or bots that get deleted? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finaljedi Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 17 hours ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said: No idea, but the only upside is that it might lead to the demise of the major social media platforms! Downside being that you might have to unban some people... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 Just now, finaljedi said: Downside being that you might have to unban some people... To which I say: COME AT ME, BROS! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 17, 2022 Author Share Posted September 17, 2022 5 minutes ago, Spawn_of_Apathy said: What fucking nonsense. The constitution doesn’t give companies the right to censor speech on their platform, but it doesn’t not give them the right either. The first amendment limits government regulated speech. Not corporate regulated speech. Not privately regulated speech either. are the courts going to go after organizations that refuse to publish or print a story because the editors and management do not like or agree with the content? does this apply to comments sections and scam posts by people or bots that get deleted? Conservatives love to forget about freedom of association. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chakoo Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 1 hour ago, finaljedi said: Downside being that you might have to unban some people... Sure but i'm sure the law says nothing about making their only theme a wall of dicks to look at while on the site. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 17, 2022 Author Share Posted September 17, 2022 Unban them but restrict them to a forum that's just them, Rachel, and wut. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost_MH Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 30 minutes ago, Jason said: Unban them but restrict them to a forum that's just them, Rachel, and wut. New board feature. Universal ignore. They can reply to anything, but nobody can see their posts and nobody can un-ignore them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 17, 2022 Author Share Posted September 17, 2022 7 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said: New board feature. Universal ignore. They can reply to anything, but nobody can see their posts and nobody can un-ignore them. So reddit's shadowban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaladinSolo Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 I mean they could just ban everyone with a TX IP, move offices from the state, ect... I'd wager the public response would have the law changed in a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.