Pikachu Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 Quote In 2020, they will become kings. Watch the new teaser trailer for The King's Man now. See the film in theatres February 14, 2020. As a collection of history's worst tyrants and criminal masterminds gather to plot a war to wipe out millions, one man must race against time to stop them. Discover the origins of the very first independent intelligence agency in The King's Man. Director: Matthew Vaughn Based on the Comic Book “The Secret Service” by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons Produced by: Matthew Vaughn, David Reid, Adam Bohling Cast: Ralph Fiennes, Gemma Arterton, Rhys Ifans, Matthew Goode, Tom Hollander, Harris Dickinson, Daniel Brühl, with Djimon Hounsou, and Charles Dance Quote
Greatoneshere Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 Hopefully it's more like the first movie and not like the second movie. I didn't even know Matthew Vaughn could make a bad movie until Kingsman: The Golden Circle. What's weird is this is the very first movie Matthew Vaughn is directing that he and his writing partner Jane Goldman aren't writing. Not sure if that will help or hurt this film. 1 Quote
TwinIon Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 I can't say that Golden Circle made me want to know anything about the Kingsmen origins, but I'm actually a bit intrigued by the trailer. Quote
EternallDarkness Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Greatoneshere said: Hopefully it's more like the first movie and not like the second movie. I didn't even know Matthew Vaughn could make a bad movie until Kingsman: The Golden Circle. What's weird is this is the very first movie Matthew Vaughn is directing that he and his writing partner Jane Goldman aren't writing. Not sure if that will help or hurt this film. First one was definitely the better film, but I still found Golden Circle entertaining. Quote
TheLeon Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 Looks like they're going for a bit of a different tone, which might help. Quote
Greatoneshere Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Emblazon said: Golden Circle was great. 1 hour ago, EternallDarkness said: First one was definitely the better film, but I still found Golden Circle entertaining. The Golden Circle was . . . fine. It had a lot of gross jokes and humor (that weren't funny) and it was overstuffed to the gills with endless action and plot, all sound and fury signifying little. Originally Vaughn wanted to make The Golden Circle into two films, and you can easily sense that when watching it. I guess I should have been clear - it's not a bad film, it's just not the level of quality I expect from Matthew Vaughn is all. Quote
Guest Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 21 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said: The Golden Circle was . . . fine. It had a lot of gross jokes and humor (that weren't funny) and it was overstuffed to the gills with endless action and plot, all sound and fury signifying little. Originally Vaughn wanted to make The Golden Circle into two films, and you can easily sense that when watching it. I guess I should have been clear - it's not a bad film, it's just not the level of quality I expect from Matthew Vaughn is all. Same thoughts from me. Disappointing more than anything. Quote
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, SoberChef said: Doesn't look bad in all actuality! That's what I'm sayin'! Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 10 hours ago, Greatoneshere said: I didn't even know Matthew Vaughn could make a bad movie until Kingsman: The Golden Circle. Stardust? Quote
Emblazon Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Keyser_Soze said: Stardust? That movie was really fun. What's not to love about gay Robert Dinero? Quote
Brian Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 Is a teaser trailer a new thing? I thought it was one or the other. Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 21 minutes ago, ManUtdRedDevils said: Is a teaser trailer a new thing? I thought it was one or the other. John Wick had one. Quote
NeoJoe Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 I'm impressed! That was a pretty good trailer. Quote
cusideabelincoln Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 I like the tone, hopefully the actual movie keeps this. I was disappointed in the Golden Circle as well. It really wasn't a movie to me. They just took everything that got a huge pop or reaction from the first film and tried to one-up themselves in the second, with no connective tissue in between to make me actually care about what's happening. Quote
Guest Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 9 hours ago, ManUtdRedDevils said: Is a teaser trailer a new thing? I thought it was one or the other. There are two types of trailers, teasers and full, though these are pretty squishy distinctions. Quote
Greatoneshere Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 12 hours ago, Keyser_Soze said: Stardust? Excellent, fantastic, feel-good fantasy film in the vein of The Princess Bride. Aggregate reviews back this up. Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 47 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said: Excellent, fantastic, feel-good fantasy film in the vein of The Princess Bride. Aggregate reviews back this up. 76% is bad Quote
Greatoneshere Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 12 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said: 76% is bad Not to me. Plenty of fantastic movies get a 76% on Rottentomatoes. A 6.78 average score is the more relevant score, and that is pretty good. Not to mention the audience score is even higher, at 86% (after 468,000 votes no less) and it also has an insanely high 7.7/10 after 239,000 votes on IMDb. In no world are all of these put together considered a "bad" movie, which is what I said I didn't know Vaughn was even capable of making until The Golden Circle, so Stardust doesn't work as a counter example. If you think any movie below, what? An 80% on Rottentomatoes and less than an 8.0 on IMDb is bad then you will miss a bunch of good movies. Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said: Not to me. Plenty of fantastic movies get a 76% on Rottentomatoes. A 6.78 average score is the more relevant score, and that is pretty good. Not to mention the audience score is even higher, at 86% (after 468,000 votes no less) and it also has an insanely high 7.7/10 after 239,000 votes on IMDb. In no world are all of these put together considered a "bad" movie, which is what I said I didn't know Vaughn was even capable of making until The Golden Circle, so Stardust doesn't work as a counter example. If you think any movie below, what? An 80% on Rottentomatoes and less than an 8.0 on IMDb is bad then you will miss a bunch of good movies. I agree. I only said it was bad to stick by my argument! Also it's hard to find a movie higher than an 8.0 on IMDB. 1 Quote
Greatoneshere Posted July 16, 2019 Posted July 16, 2019 10 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said: I agree. I only said it was bad to stick by my argument! Also it's hard to find a movie higher than an 8.0 on IMDB. Haha then why start the argument! And yes it is hard to find films above 8.0 on IMDb, hence why a 7.7 is insanely high, agreed. Quote
Pikachu Posted July 16, 2019 Author Posted July 16, 2019 The Shawshank Redemption has the highest score with a 9.3 Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted July 17, 2019 Posted July 17, 2019 9 hours ago, Pikachu said: The Shawshank Redemption has the highest score with a 9.3 That's because it's the best movie ever. Quote
GeneticBlueprint Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 I had 0 interest in the other ones. But this looks damn good. Fiennes certainly helps pique my interest. Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, GeneticBlueprint said: I had 0 interest in the other ones. But this looks damn good. Fiennes certainly helps pique my interest. You mean going all the way back to the first movie or just the first trailer? Kingsman: The Secret Service is pretty fantastic, you should be interested in it. Quote
GeneticBlueprint Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 18 minutes ago, Keyser_Soze said: You mean going all the way back to the first movie or just the first trailer? Kingsman: The Secret Service is pretty fantastic, you should be interested in it. First movie. Looked like Roger Moore era Bond but made today. Quote
Keyser_Soze Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 19 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said: First movie. Looked like Roger Moore era Bond but made today. Not even close. Now go see the first one! Quote
Greatoneshere Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 12 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said: First movie. Looked like Roger Moore era Bond but made today. You really should see the first one - it's fun and funny. The second one is . . . up to you. Quote
TwinIon Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 I felt done with the series after the second one, but I'm sufficiently interested by the trailers to give it another go. Quote
SoberChef Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Here's hoping a February release is actually going to be good! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.