Jump to content

Walgreens won’t distribute abortion pills in states where GOP AGs object


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, chakoo said:
5806.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=8
WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

Gavin Newsom said in a statement the state will not do business with any company that ‘puts women’s lives at risk’

 

Get fucked Walgreens

 

Damn got fucked by Theranos and now Gavin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1)  FDA allows Mifepristone to be carried in retail pharmacies for the first time in January 2023 (This is not a new drug, it's been around since the 80s, and available in the US for over 20 years.)

2)  Walgreens works to make it available in their pharmacies nation wide

3)  20 AGs threaten to sue Walgreens if Milfepristone is carried by them in their states

4)  Walgreens backs down from selling it for the first time in those states

5)  Rage against Walgreens for not introducing it in the states that have threatened it with legal action, no credit for expanding access to it in the majority of the country.

 

Peak 2023.

  • True 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

no credit for expanding access to it in the majority of the country

 

Why do they deserve "credit" for carrying something that was legal? I'm not going to give Walmart "credit" for expanding access to Nintendo Switch in 2022 if, all of the sudden in 2023, bumfuck states decide to threaten to sue them for carrying it, and so they stop. Selling a product when there is demand and it's legal isn't courageous. 

  • stepee 1
  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CitizenVectron said:

 

Why do they deserve "credit" for carrying something that was legal? I'm not going to give Walmart "credit" for expanding access to Nintendo Switch in 2022 if, all of the sudden in 2023, bumfuck states decide to threaten to sue them for carrying it, and so they stop. Selling a product when there is demand and it's legal isn't courageous. 

They are increasing access to abortion drugs that they have never carried before in 30 states.

They aren't willing to get involved with a political battle between the Biden administration and Republican States.  If Walgreen's lawyers were as confident as you, they probably wouldn't make this decision.

But, fuck any company that's not willing to deal with expensive lawsuits to carry a new product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

They are increasing access to abortion drugs that they have never carried before in 30 states.

They aren't willing to get involved with a political battle between the Biden administration and Republican States.  If Walgreen's lawyers were as confident as you, they probably wouldn't make this decision.

But, fuck any company that's not willing to deal with expensive lawsuits to carry a new product.

They are trying to take the path of least resistance. It has nothing to do with confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Air_Delivery said:

They are trying to take the path of least resistance. It has nothing to do with confidence.

 

I'm sure the only real calculus here is litigating it would cost money and they think it's more money than they're currently making by distributing this medicine in the relevant states. Even if they're 100% confident they'd win the litigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...