Jump to content

Cabinet schabinet (and other biden appointments)


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

I don't like the whole business model that he (and others like glenn greenwald) has where he, personally, takes in tens of thousands of dollars per month for so-so takes while actual, good journalists are getting laid off right and left.

 

That's a pretty silly take, but on brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's going to drive clicks no matter where he goes, but he could have done so at an organization that is about more than just himself and lining his bank account. It's not like he's posting revolutionary or even particularly controversial takes where having corporate benefactors would stifle what he has to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SaysWho? said:
safe_image.php?d=AQE1QdSP2GGn2V1J&w=400&
WWW.FACEBOOK.COM

NEW: President-elect Biden intends to nominate Rep. Deb Haaland as Interior secretary. If confirmed, Rep. Haaland would be the first Native American to head the department.

 

 

That is amazing!

 

This is not:  

 

social
WWW.WSJ.COM

An Iger appointment could roil politicians critical of Disney’s business in China.

 

  • Like 1
  • Guillotine 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m fine with a China dove as ambassador, but not one who already has business ties there.

 

Really all that needs to be done with China is to stiffen our enforcement of pre-existing contracts, especially the provisions regarding IP infringement by Chinese companies.  They’ve been violating those pretty openly.  That and keep our eye out for shenanigans in the South China Sea.

 

We don’t need a trade war and it’s not our job to change the way their government is run.  We can coexist, enforce the contracts we agreed to and just let the global market have an honest competition over whose goods are most successful.  Most China hawkery is just the result of being too lazy to think outside the old Cold War paradigm and realize China and the Soviet Union are two totally different beasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Signifyin(g)Monkey said:

Really all that needs to be done with China is to stiffen our enforcement of pre-existing contracts, especially the provisions regarding IP infringement by Chinese companies.  

 

Or, you know, actually work with other countries who have a problem with China themselves to coordinate the pressure campaign instead of Trump's idiotic "everything is bilateral" worldview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
1 minute ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Let it not be said that the democratic party is not also in the hands of capital

 

As I've said before, the main difference is the Democrats want to skim off the top of a nominally functional system, whereas the Republicans just want to engage in outright looting and pillaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Let it not be said that the democratic party is not also in the hands of capital

 

That's why they are, literally, the party paid to lose. I don't get why others (not you) don't get this? It's why they are so weak. They aren't weak "just cause", they are weak because they are paid to be weak. The 1% corpocracy grifters have set the system to be pro-Republican, those who can easily be bought, and pro-Democrat, those who can easily be bought but feint at caring. 

 

It's brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

 

That's why they are, literally, the party paid to lose. I don't get why others (not you) don't get this? It's why they are so weak. They aren't weak "just cause", they are weak because they are paid to be weak. The 1% corpocracy grifters have set the system to be pro-Republican, those who can easily be bought, and pro-Democrat, those who can easily be bought but feint at caring. 

 

It's brilliant.

 

captured opposition is captured

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

captured opposition is captured

 

"Please, God, no, don't make me take these wonderful corporate fundraising donations, please!!"

 

The Democrats are, in some ways, smarter than Republicans, because they have convinced us they have the moral highground. Granted, the party does fight more for people than Republicans, but they'll only ever allow so much.

 

Hence, the party paid to lose. Look at those who aren't beholden to donors (Bernies, AOC, the squad, Ro Khanna), just their small dollar donations primarily from their actual constituents. They actually fight and argue for protective policies. SHOCKING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...