Jump to content

Joe Biden beats Donald Trump, officially making Trump a one-term twice impeached, twice popular-vote losing president


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

Anyone taking the fact Bernie has recently become a millionaire as a legitimate criticism of the man vis a vis his indictment of millionaires and billionaires has gone full stupid. 

 

Brain worms for all!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

Anyone taking the fact Bernie has recently become a millionaire as a legitimate criticism of the man vis a vis his indictment of millionaires and billionaires has gone full stupid. 

 

I'm not taking it as a legitimate criticism of the man or his indictment of the rich; I'm taking it as a criticism of the obtuse and reductive rhetoric his followers employ. If the dirt bag left is too sensitive to get a taste of their own medicine and needs everyone to 'shut the fuck up', then maybe they should grow the fuck up!

 

Bernie being a millionaire and AOC acquiescing on the tax filing bill are proof-fucking-positive that progressive politics are not absolute affairs, and it is pure joy to see that reality hit the left in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris- said:

 

I'm not taking it as a legitimate criticism of the man or his indictment of the rich; I'm taking it as a criticism of the obtuse and reductive rhetoric his followers employ. If the dirt bag left is too sensitive to get a taste of their medicine and need everyone to 'shut the fuck up', then maybe they should grow the fuck up!

 

Bernie being a millionaire and AOC acquiescing on the tax filing bill are proof-fucking-positive that progressive politics are not absolute affairs, and it is pure joy to see that reality hit the left in the face.

 

Oh, I'm with you in full - my post was not directed at you. :p But I am in complete agreement with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RedSoxFan9 said:

He’s been earning a congressional salary for decades.  Even with cost of a second home in the DC area, that’s still a lot of money. 

 

Wow, it's almost as if 'wealth is bad' is an overly simplistic and reductive polemic. There is hope yet for your ability to see nuance and complexity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris- said:

 

Who claimed otherwise?

 

The people on the internets and in news saying that Bernie's arguments now against millionaires and billionaires is inherently hypocritical and disingenuous of him because he himself has recently become a millionaire (but has had money for a long time now too). It's stupid, but the arguments are already being made. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Greatoneshere said:

 

The people on the internets and in news saying that Bernie's arguments now against millionaires and billionaires is inherently hypocritical and disingenuous of him because he himself has recently become a millionaire (but has had money for a long time now too). It's stupid, but the arguments are already being made. 

 

Ah cool, nice to see RSF respond to shit that no one in this thread is actually saying. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris- said:

 

Ah cool, nice to see RSF respond to shit that no one in this thread is actually saying. 

 

Well his shit posting is usually referring back to the most base argument(s) being made in any given context regarding the news. It's why I've said the shit posting is funny but substanceless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Chris- said:

 

Wow, it's almost as if 'wealth is bad' is an overly simplistic and reductive polemic. There is hope yet for your ability to see nuance and complexity.

 

When people say “wealth is bad” they’re referring to levels of wealth that the average person would have no capability of earning if they lived 500 years, not an amount of money that secretaries sometimes end up having saved up at the end of their lives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FDR was wealthy as hell and also the closest thing we have had to a socialist president in our history, and his legacy remains intact with social security and other similar programs.

 

The personal wealth of a politician is irrelevant unless it was gotten in less than ethical or in an illegal manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SilentWorld said:

 

When people say “wealth is bad” they’re referring to levels of wealth that the average person would have no capability of earning if they lived 500 years, not an amount of money that secretaries sometimes end up having saved up at the end of their lives. 

 

And that misses the point entirely, because as Bernie's situation shows it isn't the wealth that is bad. Being rich or wealthy (not entirely the same thing) are not moral failings if they are achieved in absence of exploitation, and in a society where people have their basic needs met (whether that is food, health care, labor protections, or otherwise), they are wholly unobjectionable. Polemics like 'wealth is bad' don't capture that nuance, and their obtuseness only pushes away people who would otherwise strongly agree with the underlying policy.  It's counter-productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SilentWorld said:

Like am I missing something here? What I’m reading is Bernie has an estimated net worth of $2 million? The way people are talking it’s as if he’s worth 20 or 200 million. 

 

no one actually cares about his wealth.  Liberals are pretending his supporters care and are upset that he made money off a book deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SilentWorld said:

Like am I missing something here? What I’m reading is Bernie has an estimated net worth of $2 million? The way people are talking it’s as if he’s worth 20 or 200 million. 

 

Does that matter? I pay a lot of attention to leftist-oriented publications (Splinter, Jacobin, etc.) and organizations (like the local DSA chapter). The rhetoric expressed is always that wealth and capitalism are unequivocally bad; whether you are talking about $2 million, $20 million, or $200 million, that rhetoric is incompatible with the notion that someone can make that much money in one year without any ethical misgivings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...