Jump to content

Afghanistan Update: Islamic State claims responsibility for multiple bombings over last two days, including two Shia mosques


Recommended Posts

Just now, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

 

Oh God, yes.  

 

Tehran was more than happy to provide intelligence support when we first went in to Afghanistan in 2001 because they and the Taliban nearly came to blows on a number of occasions.

 

Weird it's almost like Iran wants to like us but we keep shitting on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like, how hard would it have been to get together anyone who worked for the NATO forces together, make a base at the airport, and just sit there until they could get everyone out? The Taliban wasn't going to attack if the US did that. But no. Instead, the US just abandons thousands of people, many of whom will be killed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

Like, how hard would it have been to get together anyone who worked for the NATO forces together, make a base at the airport, and just sit there until they could get everyone out? The Taliban wasn't going to attack if the US did that. But no. Instead, the US just abandons thousands of people, many of whom will be killed.

 

If we had kept Bagram, easy. But for some reason we decided to evacuate via an airport in a dense urban city. Every aircraft on the tarmac is RPG bait. Black Hawk Down could get a sequel tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jwheel86 said:

 

If we had kept Bagram, easy. But for some reason we decided to evacuate via an airport in a dense urban city. Every aircraft on the tarmac is RPG bait. Black Hawk Down could get a sequel tonight. 

Seems their best move is to just wait till the US pulls everyone they want out and leaves, why poke the bear and risk bringing an avalanche of shit on yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PaladinSolo said:

Seems their best move is to just wait till the US pulls everyone they want out and leaves, why poke the bear and risk bringing an avalanche of shit on yourself.

 

Exactly.

 

They've won.  There's no reason for them to be rash as they've played the long game magnificently to this point and they're not stupid.

 

Unlike apparently the intelligence agencies of the United States.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PaladinSolo said:

Seems their best move is to just wait till the US pulls everyone they want out and leaves, why poke the bear and risk bringing an avalanche of shit on yourself.

 

Because the bear can't change the overall outcome and video of a few burning C-17s might be worth the body count for the Taliban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

 

No, it absolutely isn't worth it for them, not when they will be seeking international recognition.

And Chinese investment dollars. Not that they'd be concerned or care about the actual attack, but such an attack would probably push back timelines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

 

No, it absolutely isn't worth it for them, not when they will be seeking international recognition.

 

Strategically China also benefits from those images, breaks the US invisibility narrative which helps them in the SCS. 

 

Even if you're right the close proximity of US and Taliban Forces to each other is putting a lot of faith in average Taliban fighter not to get trigger happy, or our troops to not get jumpy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Reputator said:

Politically, this is significant. Biden effectively just lost the Democrats seats in the House and Senate. He lost us the 2024 General Election. The right will be talking about this moment nonstop for the next 20+ years.

 

I think you're wildly overestimating the extent to which Americans care about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reputator said:

No, you're underestimating what a bitchstorm the right will make about this. This is an issue they don't even have to make up.

 

It won't move the needle politically relative to other issues that Biden could potentially drop or has dropped the ball on.

 

Foreign policy simply doesn't resonate electorally one way or another, no matter how much either party screams about it at the top of their lungs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...