Jump to content

US withdrawing 12,000 troops from Germany


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jose said:

One of the few things Trumpy is doing that I advocate. If only he was going about in a semi-intelligent manner, but I know that is too much to ask.

 

The problem is he's not doing this in a thoughtful matter and is clearly doing this in a way that's intended to just piss off a key NATO ally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have as much a problem with "defending Europe" and being their allies if the bases weren't supporting and launching pads for endless war in the middle east and africa.

 

That and we spend hundreds of billions on overseas bases while people are cast to the wolves here at home.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, marioandsonic said:

Yep.  If Trump ever does something right, there's a 99% chance he's doing it for the wrong reasons.

 

Riley noted this in the OP too, but worth reemphasizing:

 

 

If he were relocating the troops to Poland, which was what I remember originally reading about, it would have 1) made sense in terms of his fixation on the 2% thing since Poland is hitting that target and 2) actually made some strategic sense, given that one of the points of having troops in Europe is to make sure Russia doesn't get any ideas, and Poland is closer to that front than Germany is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the premise was to reduce our military spending by not having such a substantial presence in Europe, I'd be good with that. 

 

If we just end up spending a ton of extra money moving people and equipment from one country in Europe to another just because Merkel was mean, that seems about the stupidest possible thing to do, which means it's also the mostly likely scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's great value in mixing our cultures with others around the world and military installations like these allow for that.  There should be additional civil services that would be treated similar to the military (volunteer for long contractual periods in a chain of command) that we should be doing at home and that we should also be exporting -- but that's a different argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OSCE would've been the ideal organization to address European security issues after the fall of the Soviet Union.  In fact, the US and Canada are already parties to the  OSCE so their engagement with Europe wouldn't have been diminished at all.

 

Instead, NATO expansion  kept pushing eastwards into the former Warsaw Pact states with the resultant growing (justifiable?) paranoia in Russia of NATO forces right on their border.  How many times has Russia suffered invasions from its west that were very much existential threats to its existence?  Let's count: Charles XII of Sweden, Napoleon's Grande Armée, Germany twice in the 20th century.  How could a country in that position NOT have a revanchist reaction to military expansion to its borders?

 

NATO expansion was a VERY significant factor in Putin's rise to power, something that gets all but ignored  in the  West.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...