Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m glad more people are learning about the parliamentary rules available to the Dems that Chuck has refused to utilize. 

Posted

Gotta love that the Senate is like a poorly designed boardgame where any player can just grind shit to a halt at a whim whenever they want and the only reason it doesn't happen is norms.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Kal-El814 said:

Gotta love that the Senate is like a poorly designed boardgame where any player can just grind shit to a halt at a whim whenever they want and the only reason it doesn't happen is norms.

The fucking thing runs on unanimous consent! How goddamn broken is that?!?

 

Glad Chuck is finally finding out that he's extremely vulnerable as a NY senator and is using that to not suck...but too little too late. Shame I can't vote against him!

Posted
3 hours ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Glad Chuck is finally finding out that he's extremely vulnerable as a NY senator and is using that to not suck...but too little too late. Shame I can't vote against him!

I want him to get primaried by a Democrat with a spine as soon as possible. 

  • stepee 1
Posted

So in contrast, how many times did McConnell do this as minority leader? If the answer is often, then yeah Chuck sucks. If the answer is never, then we should be happy that Chuck is being super feisty, no?

Posted
26 minutes ago, Joe said:

So in contrast, how many times did McConnell do this as minority leader? If the answer is often, then yeah Chuck sucks. If the answer is never, then we should be happy that Chuck is being super feisty, no?

 

ap_18233738278805.jpg.jpe?cb=0bbb1c8e015
PROSPECT.ORG

The Democrats’ Senate leader lets Mitch McConnell pack the courts.

 

  • Guillotine 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Spawn_of_Apathy said:

I want him to get primaried by a Democrat with a spine as soon as possible. 

 

AOC is old enough to primary him in 2022.

Posted
52 minutes ago, Joe said:

So in contrast, how many times did McConnell do this as minority leader? If the answer is often, then yeah Chuck sucks. If the answer is never, then we should be happy that Chuck is being super feisty, no?

If Schumer could have called a vote on Obama judges and didn’t, no. He’s a waste of a seat. 

Posted
5 hours ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

The fucking thing runs on unanimous consent! How goddamn broken is that?!?

 

Glad Chuck is finally finding out that he's extremely vulnerable as a NY senator and is using that to not suck...but too little too late. Shame I can't vote against him!

 

I cannot wait to vote against him so live vicariously through me.

Posted
2 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Aoc could knock out gillibrand very easily. Chuck, the minority leader with backing from wall street, would be a stretch even for her

 

I think it depends on her NYC outreach. She obviously already knows how to campaign in her slice of NYC. So...

Posted

The other factor is the unknown after inauguration and work in the Senate. A good solid two years can paper over a lackluster previous 6+

 

If Chuck isn't willing to go to the mat for a president Biden and push some real legislative victories despite the majority, I can see blood in the water.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...