Jump to content

Ken Paxton impeachment trial starts today.


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CastletonSnob said:

It's uh, not looking good for Paxton.

 

0905%20Impeachment%20Trial%20BD%20TT%200
WWW.TEXASTRIBUNE.ORG

The pretrial motions required a majority vote. The most support a motion to dismiss received was 10 out of 30 senators.

 

 

You absolutely cannot draw any conclusions from these pre-trial motions to dismiss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

A two-thirds vote is required for Paxton to be convicted, meaning 21 of 31 senators. The Senate includes 19 Republicans and 12 Democrats, and while Angela Paxton technically isn’t allowed to vote, she counts toward the total and so is effectively a “no” vote.

 

While his wife won't be permitted to vote, she wasn't removed from the calculation of the overall "pool" of jurors.

  • Guillotine 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So much for that.

 

WWW.TEXASTRIBUNE.ORG

A conviction required 21 of 30 eligible senators. It’s a major win for the suspended attorney general, but he still faces a federal investigation and state charges.

 

Quote

 

The Texas Senate on Saturday acquitted Attorney General Ken Paxton of 16 articles of impeachment alleging corruption and bribery, his most artful escape in a career spent courting controversy and skirting consequences of scandal.

 

No article received more than 14 of the required 21 votes to convict. Only two of 19 Republican Senators, Bob Nichols of Jacksonville and Kelly Hancock of North Richland Hills, voted in favor of convicting for any article — a stark contrast to the nearly 70% of House Republicans who impeached the attorney general in May.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

Quote

 

The House impeachment managers, with glum expressions, watched helplessly as each of the articles they had meticulously prepared were rejected — one by a 28-2 margin.

Quote

Rep. Jeff Leach of Plano, who risked his standing in the Republican Party by delivering an impassioned speech urging conviction on Friday, sat with his hands clasped in front of his face.

 

Paxton, who attended just two days of the trial and was not present to witness his exoneration, was characteristically defiant.

“The sham impeachment coordinated by the Biden Administration with liberal House Speaker Dade Phelan and his kangaroo court has cost taxpayers millions of dollars, disrupted the work of the Office of Attorney General and left a dark and permanent stain on the Texas House,” Paxton said in a statement. “The weaponization of the impeachment process to settle political differences is not only wrong, it is immoral and corrupt

 

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, once his role as impartial judge was fulfilled, ripped into the House and its leadership for filing the case in the first place, which he said wasted millions of taxpayer dollars. He blasted the lower chamber for voting to impeach Paxton after only three days of consideration.

 

I’m not surprised, but damn this is garbage. It’s just out in the open corrupt here. As long as one is part of the MAGA pos cult, they’re good to do whatever they please. 

  • Guillotine 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really curious to see what happens next within the Texas GOP.

 

WWW.TEXASTRIBUNE.ORG

The lieutenant governor criticized the House for a secretive and rushed process that “wasted” taxpayer dollars. The House speaker fired back, saying Patrick confessed his bias and contempt.

 

Quote

 

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick broke his personal silence Saturday on Attorney General Ken Paxton’s impeachment after the Senate voted for acquittal, blasting the House’s impeachment process as deeply flawed.

 

“The speaker and his team rammed through the first impeachment of a statewide official in Texas in over 100 years while paying no attention to the precedent that the House set in every other impeachment before,” Patrick said from the dais after the verdict was finalized.

 

House Speaker Dade Phelan, R-Beaumont, fired back, saying Patrick ended the trial by “confessing his bias and placing his contempt for the people’s House on full display.”

 

Patrick was the presiding officer of the trial — effectively the judge — and his feelings on the matter were the subject of much speculation. While he got praise for how he handled certain aspects, like the trial rules, he also drew scrutiny for accepting $3 million from a pro-Paxton group in late June.

 

Patrick began his remarks by acknowledging he had been “unusually quiet” in recent months because he wanted to respect his role in the process. He followed by unloading on the House for foisting the impeachment upon the Senate on short notice at the end of the regular session.

 

Patrick mocked House impeachment managers for impressing upon the senators how important their decision was and how they will be remembered for their vote.

“If only the House members who voted for impeachment would’ve followed that instruction in the House, we may not have been here,” Patrick said.

 

 

 

Quote

 

Patrick also called for a state constitutional amendment reforming the impeachment process. He proposed that all House testimony should be given under oath and subject to cross examination, adding that an impeached official “should not be put on unpaid leave” while awaiting trial.

 

Patrick also said “millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on this impeachment" and called for a “full audit” of the House’s spending on it.

 

Phelan responded with a statement that was just as hostile, saying Patrick “attacked the House for standing up against corruption.”

 

“His tirade disrespects the Constitutional impeachment process afforded to us by the founders of this great state,” Phelan said. “The inescapable conclusion is that today’s outcome appears to have been orchestrated from the start, cheating the people of Texas of justice.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jason said:

 

True but the Georgia case is staying in Fulton County and he's screwed on anything where DC is the jury pool.

 

The Georgia case will probably stay in Fulton County, but that's not final yet.

 

Yes, the DC case is the one that has the highest probability of conviction for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

 

He only needs one person on the jury for him to be lucky.

Like I said, every time. 4 cases in 4 jurisdictions, 91 counts. And he needs them to be so drunk on his shit to make it through selection and still deny his process crimes not even the substance. That’s a very fine line to tread

  • True 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Like I said, every time. 4 cases in 4 jurisdictions, 91 counts. And he needs them to be so drunk on his shit to make it through selection and still deny his process crimes not even the substance. That’s a very fine line to tread


If there’s one thing I’ve learned about Trump supporters, it’s their ability to be SUBTLE. 

  • True 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...