Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I am primarily a PC gamer and do much of my gaming on 2 monitors , a high refresh 1440p g sync and a 4k next to it. My PS4 has been hooked to the 4k for awhile now but last night I was bored listening to some music and decided to hook my PS4 to my Samsung Q . As much I hate the low fps of the PS4, the HDR is a god dam haymaker to the face. I am really disappointed in myself for missing out on it for so long ,its really pushing me to skip the 3080 and just buy a PS5 or XsX .

 

PC games skipping HDR is travesty and really needs to be implemented better

Posted

It was REALLY bad a couple years ago but it has at least gotten better, most of the major games seem fine. I think it’s almost at the point where you won’t have to worry about it much for new releases soon.

Posted
1 minute ago, Man of Culture said:

 

My favorite part about Crysis Remastered in HDR was being able to immediately blind everyone in front of the TV.

Crysis Remastered: But can it blind children?! 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Dre801 said:

Agreed.  They need to take a break from pushing higher refresh rates and get more on board with HDR.  Playing Gran Turismo Sport with HDR is eyegasmic.


What...? HDR doesn’t affect framerate.

Anyway, I have an ASUS PG27UQ. HDR is great on it at 4k 120hz GSYNC. :p 

Posted
Just now, Spork3245 said:


What...? HDR doesn’t affect framerate.

Anyway, I have an ASUS PG27UQ. HDR is great on it at 4k 120hz GSYNC. :p 

Not what I'm implying.  I'm referring to PC monitors that keep getting higher and higher refresh rates.  We need more HDR capable PC monitors to hit the market.

Posted
1 minute ago, Dre801 said:

Not what I'm implying.  I'm referring to PC monitors that keep getting higher and higher refresh rates.  We need more HDR capable PC monitors to hit the market.


My monitor is full HDR(1000) and 144hz 4k... so, why not both?

Posted
1 minute ago, Dre801 said:

And you have one of a short list of monitors that does that.  Maybe people just want affordable HDR capable 60-120Hz monitors.  We need more of those.


There’s literally only 3 or 4 (real) HDR capable monitors. The issue isn’t refresh rate.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Dre801 said:

Nobody is saying it is.  SMH. 

 

43 minutes ago, Dre801 said:

Agreed.  They need to take a break from pushing higher refresh rates and get more on board with HDR. 


:silly: 

Posted
53 minutes ago, Spork3245 said:

 


:silly: 

 

That doesn’t mean what you are saying it means. He is saying that manufacturers have been focusing on upping refresh rates (evidence: all the high refresh rate monitors) but have put little effort into HDR (evidence: the handful of HDR monitors you just mentioned). His point is priorities of the manufacturers.

Posted
9 minutes ago, sblfilms said:

 

That doesn’t mean what you are saying it means. He is saying that manufacturers have been focusing on upping refresh rates (evidence: all the high refresh rate monitors) but have put little effort into HDR (evidence: the handful of HDR monitors you just mentioned). His point is priorities of the manufacturers.


Or, and hear me out here, they can do both.

 

The issue with a lack of (real) HDR monitors, afaik, is weird VESA standard certifications compared to TVs, not a lack of focus.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...