Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4582823-1533844248.jpg?crop=1xw:0.749926
WWW.POPULARMECHANICS.COM

Nobody has ever disposed of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before. Turns out it's not easy.

 

Quote

Now, according to a new General Accounting Office report (PDF), the Navy has two options. The first is to have the Navy manage the job but let the commercial industry do the non-nuclear work. The Navy would allow industry to scrap the non-nuclear parts of the ship but preserve a 27,000-ton propulsion space containing the reactors. The propulsion space would then be transported to Puget Sound Naval Base, where the reactors would be removed and sent to Hanford. This is the most expensive option, costing a minimum of $1.05 billion up to $1.55 billion and taking 10 years to complete, starting in 2034.

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Remove fissle material then scuttle it to the depths of the ocean. Boom just saved a billion dollars


I’ve watched too many kaiju films to endorse this idea. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...