Jump to content

BRICS is more than a kneejerk reaction.


Recommended Posts

he perception of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) as a threat to the USA and Western power can be understood from several perspectives, although it's important to note that this view is not universally held and opinions on this matter can vary. Here are some reasons why some individuals and analysts might consider BRICS a potential threat to Western influence:

Economic Competition: BRICS countries collectively represent a significant portion of the world's population and possess rapidly growing economies. As they continue to develop, they could potentially challenge the economic dominance of Western countries, affecting industries, trade, and investment. This economic competition might lead to shifts in global economic power and influence.

Geopolitical Influence: The rise of BRICS could lead to a more multipolar world order, where multiple centers of influence exist rather than a clear Western-centric power structure. This could impact the USA and Western countries' ability to shape global geopolitical outcomes according to their preferences.

Alternative Ideological Models: Some BRICS countries follow political and economic models that differ from Western values of democracy and capitalism. China's state-led capitalism, for instance, presents an alternative economic model that could appeal to other nations and challenge the influence of Western-style capitalism.

Access to Resources: Several BRICS countries are rich in natural resources. As they grow economically and seek to secure their own interests, they might have the ability to influence global resource markets, potentially affecting Western countries' access to crucial resources.

Global Governance and Institutions: BRICS nations have expressed dissatisfaction with the existing global governance structures, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which were established by Western powers. The emergence of alternative institutions or the desire to reform existing ones could challenge Western countries' control over these international organizations.

Technological Advancements: Some BRICS countries are investing heavily in technology and innovation. China, for example, has made significant strides in areas like artificial intelligence and 5G technology. If BRICS nations become leaders in these fields, they could potentially shape the direction of technological progress, challenging Western technological dominance.

Cultural Influence: The cultural output and soft power of BRICS countries, particularly China, could have an impact on global cultural trends and values. This might challenge the predominance of Western cultural influence.

Alliance Formation: If BRICS nations strengthen their collaboration and form deeper alliances, it could lead to the formation of a counterbalance to Western-led alliances like NATO.

It's worth noting that while these factors can be seen as potential challenges to Western power and influence, they don't necessarily mean that BRICS countries are actively seeking to undermine the West. The geopolitical landscape is complex, and countries pursue their interests within the context of their unique circumstances. The perception of BRICS as a threat largely depends on one's perspective and the specific geopolitical goals of the countries involved.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was somewhat expecting more from the recently-concluded BRICS summit in South Africa regarding the use of local currencies for cross-border payments for trade and other financial transactions.  I really thought that an actual plan or mechanism would be rolled-out rather than a statement "encouraging" members to study it further.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

I was somewhat expecting more from the recently-concluded BRICS summit in South Africa regarding the use of local currencies for cross-border payments for trade and other financial transactions.  I really thought that an actual plan or mechanism would be rolled-out rather than a statement "encouraging" members to study it further.

Is it really that surprising?  None of the countries in it really have anything in common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...