b_m_b_m_b_m

I am sane. I also declare myself sane

Whole lotta people aren't too concerned if it's one or the other, or can tell the difference between business and personal debt. Just call it Trump's debt and let the insinuations work for themselves

Dems should be talking up his massive debt in addition to the taxes. A lot of people, particularly the "sensible" "moderate" types from the midwest, see personal debt as a moral failure. There's still undecided voters who can be won. This also goes against the narrative that he's a good businessman!

If it's not illegal what's the fucking point of the laws just lol

I can 100% guarantee Biden will say Trump "paid practically no federal income taxes" several times, but he will slip up once and say "Trump paid no federal income taxes" and get 6 Pinocchios pants on fire 24/7 coverage on CNN and MSNBC to say nothing of fox

Very good time to remember some of Trump's worst polling was around the time of his *one* signature legislative achievement: his tax cut which primarily went towards the wealthy. People don't actually like the rich paying so little in taxes!

Trump would never buy Crayola. He's very clearly a Roseart dude

Arial size 14? This monster must be stopped Verdana or gtfo

Often it comes up that Catholic bishops or some priests I don't recall exactly, will threaten/actively try to deny Holy Communion to pro-choice elected officials.

Find one today, in the year of our Lord 2020. Hint: you can't because they aren't Going after her cult Dems really aren't doing, despite it being fair game in my mind given the context that Jason posted above

"That was racism over there in racist Kentucky! Eric who? No comment"

Maybe I should have qualified my original post with "in the year of our Lord 2020" but it's quite clear that the message was received back then and the talking points on her from electeds has changed. But leave it to feinsten to fuck it up though!

I don't give a single fuck about what Diane feinsten said, much less what she said 3 years ago.

On the one vote per state? Keep voting until someone wins. No joke. See the election of 1876

Also you better believe the gop would have 0 qualms going after a Muslim judge openly and explicitly, on TV, print, and radio, because of their faith. Republicans do not do anything in good faith!

Deutsche Bank! Who would have seen this coming?!?!?!!?

I know that, my grandfather was one, it was for illustrative purposes

If someone were part of a secretive Freemason or some social / political / religious fraternity-like group it would be worth investigating and figuring out the extent of their stated oaths (not perceived oaths like you see in Catholic and Jewish directed hate) and how that conflicts/limits/explains their commitment to the judicial oath (in this instance) that they will end up taking. This is particularly important when there is not a shared cultural connection like you see with most all lawmakers and the appointees they evaluate. I am decidedly not anti religious. Religious institutions, like all institutions, are to be held as suspect though.

Like I'm not going to go line by line defending Diane feinstens committee questioning (just lol) but looking out today I don't see anything from normal electeds but her views on roe and the ACA and other policy

Questioning someone over a fringe group, which happens to be religious, over their lifelong oaths is fine. Other than that you have 0 idea how I feel about religion and qualification for political office

Gotta separate Richmond (state capital) from Richmond (city)

(There are no Democrats attacking her faith)