SaysWho?

I know that part . But Rachel having the full scoop of something that apparently happened to him is where I'm confused.

Exactly what I was thinking! I really was the judge of your idea.

I'm so confused

He was this person prior to Beau. Guy lost his wife and kids and nearly lost Beau in the 70s. Listen to how he speaks to the parents and spouses of dead soldiers at this event starting at around 3:14. The guy fucking knows what losing a kid is like. He nearly broke down while debating Palin.

Cotton is part of a state that should be combined with another state. He's not one to talk. Same with the Dakotas.

Has it? It certainly seems less popular than the 90s or 60s, and they still have no power nationwide. The one libertarian in Congress is only there because he was a Republican who changed parties.

Let's make it easy. No fair-minded person should be confused about this: Nobody here said this. Nobody here said that. On the other hand, people were already shitting on the lesbian characters years ago, masking it with "agenda" because that's what sexists, racists, and homophobes do nowadays: I'm sure these people, desperate for relevance in a world passing them by, didn't review bomb it en masse. I'm sure the game is legitimately is getting a 3.0 average and that the people who posted immediately after you could make reviews played the game and had well-thought out things to say. And non-sarcastically, I'm pretty sure everyone ITT who has responded to you doesn't think lowly of someone who played the game and wrote a mediocre or bad review because of things they didn't like about the gameplay (though I'd say on technical merits alone, it's probably nearly impossible to give it a 3, which is a different argument and conversation).

Correct. Notice how everyone responding to you is saying the same thing I am about your inability to talk to people here. Right now, you're transparently trying to turn it around and say others aren't reading your posts. Please don't waste my time with that.

I did, probably more than you actually are reading anyone's posts. You can either talk to us, or you can continue to make a straw man and an ass out of yourself.

Carly Fiorina is voting for Biden Fiorina was a Tea Party Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. So her politics sucks, but I'll take the vote.

Are they relevant to what anyone here is saying? Or is it easier for you to argue with people ITT by pretending they're other people?

Joe Biden to accept nomination at mostly virtual Milwaukee convention

I could have sworn both games did. Like TLOU did early on, but I ALWAYS forget to do it whenever I replay it.

You'd think they'd love Obama, then.

That guy who wants to commit treason and murder an entire race is certainly a bad apple.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/24/politics/devin-nunes-twitter-lawsuit-cow/index.html

Next time I eat crow, I have to do it like this. Also I'm glad you like the first one!

I remember everyone freaking out in April over that bump in his polling. Why couldn't the election be today?

I still remember when they thought their "boycott" of Rogue One was successful. Or their review bombs of Captain Marvel. The "silent majority" is a loud minority.

You're not listening to a word anyone is saying. Either that, or you'd like to talk to us as if we're "a number of them" because it's easier to do that. I'm seriously befuddled how a seemingly intelligent person can infer those conclusions from this conversation unless he's posting from the Twilight Zone and our posts are actually saying different things in that dimension.

AOC on her win: "When I won in 2018, many dismissed our victory as a “fluke.” Our win was treated as an aberration, or bc my opponent “didn’t try.” So from the start, tonight’s race was important to me. Tonight we are proving that the people’s movement in NY isn’t an accident. It‘s a mandate."

How much time did you guys spend in downtown Seattle? I spent a few hours there exploring everything building and unlocked the trophy for doing so. It reminded me of that one open area in Lost Legacy. I'm not ready to watch reviews, especially still not being far into the game, but I hear his review was uncharacteristically serious?

Kentucky's Senate primary is too close to call. I'm kind of tired and just skimmed, but I think McGrath is leading 44.7-36.5 with 54% reporting. They have to count a bunch of absentee ballots, so results arrive June 30.