Jump to content

Chairslinger

Members
  • Posts

    32,245
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Chairslinger

  1. 1 hour ago, PaladinSolo said:
    WWW.BBC.CO.UK

    Critics say it was inspired by unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that planes are spraying poison.

     

     

    In the debate over the Tennessee bill, lawmakers and witnesses cited a range of both reliable and debunked facts about geoengineering and weather modification, and at least one witness said she believed the White House was engaged in climate experiments but could not provide definitive proof.

     

    1 hour ago, TUFKAK said:

    Republicans focused on the important thing 

     

     

    The best thing about that is, if I remember right, they had to edit the bill a couple times because they realized the wording would stop actual, legit polluting done by businesses in the state.

     

    "Hey now, we are just trying to press on the fear centers of the brains of tinfoil hat wearing weirdos....we don't want to risk actually stopping hog farmers from spraying aerated pig shit into the air!!!"

     

    -Some Republican, probably

    • Guillotine 2
  2. 1 hour ago, Commissar SFLUFAN said:

     

    That particular DOJ policy involves initiating prosecutions during the latter stages of an elections cycle, but that policy (theoretically) has no impact on prosecutions that began prior to the elections cycle.

     

     

    I mean, to me it seems like at this point it's like arming kids with uzis in a game of tag and then being a stickler for the no tag back rule.

     

    Trump tries to overthrow the government.

     

    The government in various outlets has charged him with nearly 100 felonies in a lead up to the election.

     

    I think at a certain time and place there is merit to the no charging a candidate rule, but haven't we long since burned that bridge/whistled past that graveyard/pick your own saying?

  3. 1 hour ago, Signifyin(g)Monkey said:

    Trump’s own lawyers are (successfully) violating his right to a speedy trial lol

     

    AMP.CNN.COM

    Judge Juan Merchan is holding a pre-trial hearing Monday to discuss the discovery issues that led to the delay of the trial on charges brought by the Manhattan district attorney related...

     

     

    It's going to be poetic justice if his efforts manages to land one or more of these trials smack dab in the middle of the election.

     

    Honestly, since the average memory span of major Trump scandals seems to be about 2 or 3 weeks for the public and media Trump probably would be better off just getting convicted now and have the appeals process going during the election rather than have it front of mind during the election.

     

    If someone had timed the Pussy tape a liiiiiitle better we might not have had this decade of hell to begin with.....

  4. 51 minutes ago, Jason said:

    lololololololololol

     

    WWW.NBCNEWS.COM

    The former president must post the bond for the full amount he owes Monday or New York Attorney General Letitia James could try to seize his bank accounts or properties.

     

     

     

    It was always a long shot, but I don't see how an appeals court grants him any kind of relief after that statement.

     

    Maybe if his lawyers come up with a firm plan and date on how they need a set time to complete a sale on a property to raise the money or something....but how do you get general relief when the guy is literally saying, "I got the money, but I just don't want to give it to ya!"

    • Halal 1
    • Hype 1
  5. 3 hours ago, Mr.Vic20 said:

    Forgoing the mind numbing stupidity of that image's "meaning" for a moment, I have several issues with the construction methods on display here. :nottalking:

     

     

    I mean, I feel like as far as political cartoons go a little sign or something would have been good.

     

    Because if you know where it's located I feel like the first impression is....wait, why is the Statue of Liberty building a wall on the Canadian border.....

    • Haha 1
  6. 13 hours ago, stepee said:

     

    Wait, what was he trying to say?

     

     

    I feel ya man.

     

    It's like it's one thing to mix up a name, but I can't even begin to follow the line of misfiring brain cells that leads to that fucking sentence.

     

    How do you get to Joe Biden "beating" Obama. A man who he never ran against except in 2008(when Obama beat him), is the SAME party as, and indeed served under him as his Vice fucking President for 8 years.

     

    It's like his aging mind is only able to hold a limited cast of main characters(Biden, Obama, Clinton, McCain, Pelosi, Pence, DeSantis etc.) but he has absolutely no interest(or perhaps ability) to put them in their proper places while he tells the same stories over and over again.

     

    I think maybe the most concerning one I have seen so far is when he was campaigning against Haley, was at an event specifically to talk about Haley, and yet he went on at length about how "she" was at fault for J6 because of the Capital police. An event that happened when Haley had been out of government for years. As I said, it is one thing to flub a name, but literally the only connection between what Trump was saying and reality was that it involved "an uppity woman who pissed me off....".

     

    It's not great when grandpa starts mixing up Uncle Steve and Uncle Ray's name. It's a whole 'nother level when he starts telling the story of how he and grandma met.....and it's actually the well known family story of how your mom and dad met....

    • Haha 1
  7. It feels like you really only need to see the headlines to know how Joe did.

     

    Republicans are so used to their own reality bubble that they have spent months gleefully telling a narrative about Biden.

     

    They committed one of the most basic, politics 101 blunders about "managing expectations" so all Joe had to do was go out there and basically not shit his pants and pretty much everyone looked around confused like, "Wait, this is the guy Republicans have been talking about? He seems fine...".

     

    And now Republicans, as they are wont to do, are absolutely FURIOUS that people are believing their own lying eyes instead of Fox News.

     

    The same will likely happen for the debates because Republicans have nothing left in their bag of tricks except going 100% intensity all the time to press on the nerve centers of their follower's lizard brains.

    • Like 1
    • True 1
    • Halal 1
  8. Tens of thousands die because of the politics of gun control.

     

    Children drowning trying to cross the border.

     

    Hundreds of thousands die because masks and vaccines were exploited as a political tool.

     

    But all of a sudden politics is supposed to stop at the water's edge because of the unthinkable tragedy that a rich 60 year old white guy got cancer? The same guy who used those very issues to make millions by being the court jester for Y'all Qaeda? 

     

    Nope.

     

    michael-keaton.gif

     

    • Halal 4
  9. 5 hours ago, CastlevaniaNut18 said:

    Stomach cancer, not a fun way to go. 
     

    I admit to liking “Beer for my Horses” that he did with Willie Nelson, but otherwise, meh. He leaned hard into that right-wing dumb patriotism act and fuck all that. 
     

    RIP in peace. 

     

    In some ways I think Keith was the blueprint for the modern day celebrity chud like how Limbaugh was the mold for the horrible modern right wing media. 

  10. 4 hours ago, Greatoneshere said:

    Like many here, I have a strong feeling a third defamation lawsuit is inevitable. Wasn't she originally just seeking an additional $10 million in damages from the post-verdict defamation remarks? So getting $83.3 million is pretty good. I hope she keeps it up every chance she gets.

     

     

    It almost seemed like Trump and Habba were so used to pulling the circus atmosphere bullshit in Engoron's court that by the time they recalibrated to Kaplan's more no nonsense style and the jury they had already lost Trump tens of millions in punitive damages alone and Habba nearly spent a night in jail pretty much solely because they couldn't shut their damn mouths :lol:

    • Haha 2
  11. 13 hours ago, Bacon said:

    Ya fools seen his leprosy hand?

    Fucker is falling apart.

    When's that expiration date tho?

     

     

    Oh man, tell me that would not be the perfect end to the Trumpian era of politics. Him going around the country like Johnny Syphilis-seed starting outbreaks.

     

    And we get to see very serious news shows arguing about how infecting wide swaths of his electorate with an old timey prostitute disease actually helps him ellectorally....

     

     

     

     

    • Haha 2
  12. On 12/21/2023 at 9:34 PM, LazyPiranha said:

    The sentence has less to do with the crime itself which goes beyond simple leaks because he did try to extort them, but because of him being tried in relation to his mental condition.  If you’ve got a guy who is, in open court, proudly claiming they not only will go back to crime but wants to do it as soon as possible, then what other choice do you have?  A regular prison stint won’t help this kid at all, he needs professional medical help until he’s deemed to not be a danger.  

     

     

    Give him a second term?

  13. You know, I remember about 4 years ago in the lead up to the 2020 election I got a lot of scoffs from people, even some on this board, for saying that if Trump won he would almost certainly run for a third term in 2024.

     

    People were way too confident that something like the 22nd amendment would preclude him from running again. Seeing him steamroll the 14th amendment pretty much in exactly the way that I predicted the 22nd amendment would not stop a guy with 90% support in the Republican Party is a bummer to see I was probably right all along. Wade pointing out about the amendment not applying to primaries is the exactly the point I made about the 22nd. 

     

    And Republicans are already leaning hard on the "the voters, not judges should decide on who runs for president" is another one pretty much word for word I brought up. And once Trump wins the nomination with overwhelming support, it will be hard for any court to seemingly strike down his candidacy(again, this would be true of the 22nd as much as the 14th).

     

    And it's not exactly a dead issue. If he wins in 2024, and he somehow makes it to 2028, I say there's a good chance he runs again.

     

     

    Edit: Oh, and by the way, mark my words SCOTUS will overrule this, but also not side with Trump on the presidential immunity thing and the mainstream media will laud it as a triumph of moderation and compromise.

     

    SCOTUS loves when Trump brings these absolute bonkers cases that even they can't side with because when they rule against him the media slobbers all over them for doing the bare minimum.

  14. 6 minutes ago, MarSolo said:


    The fuck did I just read? That article was just word salad of “here’s a redneck parade, also, this area is terrible and the residents blame Biden, also here’s more redneck parade stuff, but these people blame Biden and think Trump will fix everything.”

     

    I don’t know, I think these people are being dishonest, there’s no way this town went to shit in the last three years. 

     

     

     

     

     

    Damn you, Biden!!! *shakes fist*

    • Haha 3
    • True 1
×
×
  • Create New...