-
Posts
290 -
Joined
Reputation
21 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Joe Biden intends to seek a second term as US president
Demut replied to Demut's topic in The Political Re-Education Camp
Give the guy some credit, he'd still manage at least a moderate trot. -
~* Tripe/Counter-Tripe *~
Demut replied to GeneticBlueprint's topic in The Political Re-Education Camp
Finally something progressives and white supremacists can agree on: Fewer African-Americans and Natives on the packaging of their products! -
Joe Biden intends to seek a second term as US president
Demut replied to Demut's topic in The Political Re-Education Camp
I mean ... that's how he won last time. Didn't see a thread about this interview from yesterday. Maybe not exactly surprising but still a bit ... odd coming from the guy who campaigned on being a "transitional president" and said Guess their time just hasn't come yet, hm? Well, maybe towards the end of this decade then, I suppose. Unless there's still another geriatric "transitional president" that has to show the kids how it's done first before it's their turn. -
Producers of 'Rust' fined $100,000 for safety breaches WWW.DW.COM The producers of the movie have been fined for "serious" safety breaches, which led to the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins last year. Actor Alec Baldwin has been charged with involuntary manslaughter. I guess this doesn't come as that much of a surprise anymore after the previous lawsuit already showed the way this all is probably gonna go ...
-
Joe Biden intends to seek a second term as US president WWW.DW.COM The president says he plans to seek reelection in 2024 but is not ready for a full-blown campaign yet. Should he serve a second term, Biden would be 86 by the time he leaves office. HUH. Really? Well, this'll be interesting.
-
Sorry, Shader, it just didn't happen to be up top in the Unread Content list for me before I'll promise to try to be faster for you from now on Political grandstanding, I imagine, to signal to their electorate (by pretending to be doing something without actually doing something). Why was that anti-lynching bill passed some time back necessary even though it was obviously already illegal to begin with? Same reason, different topic. I hadn't considered that but yeah, we'll see.
-
I'm not saying it would be perfect, Xbob, just one possible way to arrive at a more objective, quantifiable answer to the question of how much of an impact it had. And regarding polls and people not answering, there's an entire science around that so with enough resources I think we could arrive at quality data in theory
-
Oh, cool, apparently Shader's a telepath now, too. That lad astonishes me every day anew. Just pointing out the flaws in the argument in the article. If the rebuttal is "Well, they'll simply ignore existing law and interpret it however they want" then they could already do so even without this amendment. Reminds me of all the hysteria surrounding bill C-16 in Canada. Wake me up once something actually happens on the basis of it IRL.
-
All law ultimately is but I get your point. However, there's already vague enough "crimes" that they can use for that (e.g. "creating a public disturbance") and the paragraph the bill refers to (§ 39-17-901) does further define what exactly counts as "harmful to minors". Of course they can ignore what is listed there as prerequisites for it to count as such but then again, they can ignore any law if they so choose and no one holds them to account for it. Especially relevant seems this part: "(C) Taken as whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific values for minors;" Seems to me normal gay parades would be excluded from counting as adult-oriented entertainment on that basis.