Jump to content

Mathematicians Have Found the Elusive D(9) number after 32 years!


Remarkableriots

Recommended Posts

mathematics-conceptual-illustration-roya
WWW.POPULARMECHANICS.COM

A supercomputer needed months to calculate it.
Quote

 

They found what is known as the ninth Dedekind number, the latest in a set of numbers that follow a very specific set of rules.

 

The last Dedekind number to be found required use of the world’s most powerful supercomputer, and this one took new calculation methods and new hardware on top of a much-improved supercomputer to find.

 

A Dedekind number is not exactly easy to explain, but here’s the idea. Dedekind numbers come from a type of logic called a Boolean function. In a Boolean function, you only have two options for inputs that represent a “true” state and a “false” state, and two options for that represent the same things.

 

it took the world’s most powerful supercomputer (in 1991, but still—pretty powerful) to find D(8). It took an even more incredibly powerful supercomputer to find D(9), and even that still needed help. The breakthrough came in two pieces: a calculation method called the P-coefficient formula, which allowed D(9) to be calculated as a sum rather than directly, and highly specific hardware called field programmable gate arrays.

“In our case, by exploiting symmetries in the formula, we were able to reduce the number of terms to ‘only’ 5.5*1018—an enormous amount. By comparison, the number of grains of sand on Earth is about 7.5*1018, which is nothing to sneeze at, but for a modern supercomputer, 5.5*1018 operations are quite manageable,” Van Hirtum said in a press release. With the right hardware, that is.

 

Once the programming and machine were set and ready to go, the supercomputer still needed about five entire months to run the calculation. But it did manage the feat, and when it was done, the researchers finally had an answer to their question. D(9) is now a known quantity: 286,386,577,668,298,411,128,469,151,667,598,498,812,366.

 

Seeing the number makes it make a little more sense why finding it was so difficult.

This discovery lays to rest a 32-year-old question. And as for D(10), who knows if we’ll ever find it. We may just need to be happy with D(9) for a while.

@legend I expect you to find D(10), so get to work! We also need you to explain in detail the significance of this discovery.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...