Jump to content

PaladinSolo

Members
  • Posts

    11,328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by PaladinSolo

  1. 30 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

    Absolutely true.

    But a power outage is a different issue than the usage of water resources.

    The American south wouldn't look anything like it does now without A/C regardless of water resources, the people that live there are not used to these temps for long periods of time, which are dangerous to the young and elderly, of which i'm sure are the majority of the numbers cited for a city of millions.

  2. 25 minutes ago, Air_Delivery said:

    Are fighter jets really that useful though? It seems like AA even for shitty Russia is too good for anything not low observable.

    Well being able to fully utilize AGM-88s would make Russian AA think twice about turning on, plus all the other weapons they could use to make offensive pushes that much stronger.

  3. 2 hours ago, CitizenVectron said:

     

    Yeah, I'm not sure how much more difficult they are to shoot down other than the reduced time to react/track. I don't know if it was someone here or elsewhere that put it well, which is something like:

     

    Russia boasts and boasts about the futuristic prowess of their weapons, but the weapons turn out to be duds. The US, on the other hand, builds their weapons to counter the full hypothetical potential of these Russian weapons, and actually succeeds.

    Yeah, F-15 comes to mind, was built to counter the MiG-25 which was supposed to be some Russian super fighter than we couldn't touch, then when a pilot defected with one we found out the F-15 absolutely outclasses it in just about every way but absolute top speed because the US severely overestimated its abilities and built the F-15 to those specs.

  4. I don't get how hypersonics are supposed to be any harder to knock down, other than time to target shooting them down on the other end doesn't mean you need a faster missile just an accurate one that has a good idea of where its going.  Their extreme speed also makes slight maneuvers to avoid intercepts difficult as the extra stress and heat could cause it to destroy itself though i'm sure someone will figure it out eventually.

  5. Unless you care about RT going with AMD is the better option, pretty much across the board and at a cheaper price, hell AMD's last gen cards are still viable due to VRAM usage going through the roof so they're now outperforming 30 series on newer games even with RT enabled because of VRAM.

  6. All 5 women in the state senate in SC defeated a similar ban by filibustering it, 3 republicans, 1 dem and 1 independent, GOP is nuts if they think this shit is popular.

     

    644ae81200db74.63468768-e1682684177740.j
    THEHILL.COM

    The South Carolina state Senate rejected a near-total abortion ban on Thursday, after the chamber’s five female lawmakers led a multiday filibuster against the bill. Three Republicans, a Democrat a…

     

    • Like 1
  7. 9 minutes ago, Xbob42 said:

    So wait, all the complaints I've seen have been that the game can't even run at 60 at the lowest settings and resolution but now they're hitting 70-80 FPS for the most demanding area and 120 for the second, with max settings? I feel like I've missed part of the conversation.

    Well they definitely weren't using a 7800x3d if they couldn't run the game at 60 on low, but considering the absolute best CPU/GPU combos are having a rough go at it its pretty easy to see taking a step down or 2 could be brutal, especially NVIDIA users with lower VRAM amounts.

  8. 3 hours ago, Xbob42 said:

    Can we get some samples from AMD and Intel CPUs here? Every "this is the worst performance I've ever seen in a video game" thread has seemingly come from AMD CPU owners. I'm on a 13900k and while, like I said, there's definitely the occasional stutter (like the first game) it's nowhere near, not even in the same UNIVERSE as the problems I'm seeing being reported.

     

    DAXLy6I.jpg

     

    I keep waiting for the performance ball to drop but I think it might just be CPU starved and if your CPU can meet its crazy demands performance is mostly fine, and by fine I mean I got like 70-80 in the first world and am getting 100-120 in the second.

     

    Obviously it's still a massive shitshow because uhh, no one should need a fuckin' 13900k to run this, but whatever the issue is I think it might be fixable? Usually you know performance is well and truly fucked when absolutely no one can run a game well. If they can figure out what's causing the absolutely insane CPU thrashing and maybe get VRAM under control, which I have no idea how hard or time consuming either is, I think they can definitely get it playable on far more machines.

    Doesn't seem to be AMD related at all, the numbers you're talking about are basically identical to the ones on the 7800x3d people are seeing, which is considered to be the best gaming CPU out there.  I've even seen 7900xtx numbers edging out the 4090 in this game which is just stupid.

×
×
  • Create New...