Jump to content

Jwheel86

Members
  • Posts

    5,678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Jwheel86

  1. 32 minutes ago, SFLUFAN said:

    @Jwheel86 - what is your status?

    Made it safely to Raleigh, barely any traffic once we got by the Marine base (morons opened the schools then early dismissed the EXACT time my County started evacuating through that County, flooded the evacuation route with buses).

     

    Staying with a friend tonight then going to a hotel tomorrow. Raleigh isn't the best option but better to have issues here than where the house is. We live in the middle of nowhere on a MAJOR body of water, house is solid concrete but if we have a breach we're screwed since it could be days before we're reached (one road in through a forest).

  2. 36 minutes ago, gamer.tv said:

    I think arguing that there is no evidence or study of the drug is a valid reason for not making use of it.  Considering how little money the NHS has at the moment, i can appreciate that whilst some decisions are very hard to make, they would need to focus on what they know will work, without future detriment to patient health. 

     

    "But without a better idea of the longterm impact of the drug on patients, some of whom face a death sentence at the age of 2, it wasn’t possible to conclude that the price was justified."

     

     

    I think it depends on how you define long term, the FDA studies are pushing 4 years and none in those trials have declined or even plateaued in terms of gaining milestones. Kids who'd be on trachs by now are walking. 

  3. Best article I could find:

    https://endpts.com/biogens-big-breakthrough-drug-spinraza-runs-into-a-barrier-as-nice-turns-thumbs-down-on-reimbursement/

     

    The UK has decided not to cover Spinraza, the first drug to treat Spinal Muscular Atrophy (leading genetic cause of infant death), even in cases where the drug can prevent symptoms entirely. They argue there is no long term studies and no evidence it will save NHS money. I'm not surprised they aren't covering it in adults, there you can kind of make an argument, but not covering kids, including "dead before 2" Type 1 kids is mind blowing cruel. 

  4. George Will did say in a field of 18 Democrats running for the nomination that the DNC could easily be hijacked, just like Trump hijacked the RNC. Biden and Sanders are the only ones going into it with any degree of real support. I worry Biden is a ticking Me Too time bomb (real or not) and Sanders is the only one progressives can agree on. Remove them and the base and the center establishment will fracture into a 18 pieces. Perfect situation for a celebrity or other blow hard to swoop in turn the debates into a circus by making the others look small (exactly what Trump will do in the General).

  5. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pence-details-plan-for-creation-of-space-force-in-what-would-be-the-sixth-branch-of-the-military/2018/08/09/0b40b8d0-9bdc-11e8-8d5e-c6c594024954_story.html?utm_term=.81bc42377a38

     

    Few highlights from Pence:

    -US Space Command is going to be recreated as a Combatant Command by the end of the year (I think Rumsfeld disbanded it), assuming responsibility from US Strategic Command. 

    -Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space, a new top level civilian position reporting to the Secretary of Defense “to oversee the growth and expansion of the sixth branch of service.”

    -"Budget neutral"

     

    Sounds like they are going full retard on this by creating a Department of the Space Force equal to Departments of the Navy, Air Force, and Army vs simply a new branch under the Department of the Air Force (like how the Marine Corps is under the Department of the Navy). That new Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space is basically a Secretary of the Space Force in all but name. 

     

    The natural candidate to build out US Space Command is Air Force Space Command (Strategic Command's Space Component, basically already doing that job, and the Air Force's administrative hub for space), but that means it can't serve as the foundation for US Space Force (pretty sure that's illegal, Joint Chiefs can't have operational authority).

     

    Such a bureaucratic mess.

×
×
  • Create New...