Jump to content

Scape Zero

Members
  • Posts

    22,771
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Scape Zero

  1. 4 hours ago, Spork3245 said:

    @Scape Zero @2user1cup @eggydoo

    Here’s a better vid of my digital dash; I flipped through the modes so you can see it change as well as put the description on so you can see what settings are changing in the center (steering feel/precision, throttle, suspension and exhaust modes)

     

     

     

    That's cool, didn't realize it was digital.

  2. I think the problem is just most SP games just aren't worth the price of admission. So people generally don't want to buy many of them, so I'm return developers don't want to make many of them.

     

    That's not to say most are bad, it's just things like CSGO and R6S are not only cheap, but they are games you can play for years and years and never get bored.

     

    Bethesda is in this unique place where their single player games ARE played for years and years. Look at how old Skyrim is, and how high on the Steam charts it is.

     

    I think we'll see even Bethesda start to calm down on SP games soon though. The reason why TES and Fallout do so well it's cause how much content is in the base game, how much gets added with expansions, and then the metric fuckton of mods, as well as the scale of the mods that come out for these games. Rage 2 isn't going to be something tens of thousands of people will be playing 8 years after it's launch, but TES6 probably will be.

     

    I don't think people are against something that you play by yourself, they are just against paying 60 dollars for a game that gets you 10 hours of fun. In a world where the top played games are fun to play everyday, cost nothing at the low end, and 30 bucks on the high-end, why would you want to want to spend a lot more money on a lot less game?

     

    Bethesda is never going to have to worry about TES and Fallout. I do think we will see games like Doom and Rage become more MP focused. Doom worked because it was a pure old-school game done well. It was refreshing in a sea of bad CoD like single player FPS games. How long will that last though? How long until the next Doom game is just the next Doom game?

  3. On 7/18/2018 at 2:36 PM, Spork3245 said:

     

    5420_FF45-_EED3-43_BF-_A8_D3-0_FEBF0952_


    734525_CE-1_F9_F-4367-92_E8-6_D71197_F01


    82_F2_CF1_C-_A93_F-4_E07-_B3_AF-9_DD48_C


    A613_DBDA-74_AF-4298-_B705-_A234_D4_A4_F


    C5_B88_CE9-_F056-47_CF-8902-6_ED0_E2_A9_

    FF7_D301_B-7072-470_E-_B28_B-1604346_A57

     

    The leather is WAY thicker, the headrests feel like legit pillows :p 

    There are virtually no hard plastics on anywhere that would actually be touched; everything is soft-touch with varying degrees of “softness”, even the center console around the cup holders. Also, notice all of the accent stitching. The leather on the armrests is also MUCH thicker than my 2016 GT Premium :sun: 

     

     

    Looks like Ford has come a long way with the interior of the Mustang.

     

    I like the tachometer.

  4. On 6/26/2018 at 5:44 PM, Spork3245 said:

     

    People with money are insane. They probably regretted not getting the blue one or something. I'm being serious.

     

    Repos or just overall couldn't actually afford it.

  5. On 7/19/2018 at 3:48 PM, Nokt said:

    Forge wasn’t at launch

     

    To be fair, the forge we got is by far the most powerful customization tool outside of modding tools.

     

     

    It's probably for the best. Chances are it would end up being the primary thing being developed, and it wouldn't be as good as the sea of BR games we already have. I'm not against the idea, but not if it's going to be the primary focus.

  6. 5 minutes ago, legend said:

     

    I think Jobs was uniquely talented, just not in the engineering sense (although he wasn't bad, he wasn't great, either). He had a great sense for what a technology product should be, more than most people in tech. But I absolutely agree with you that Jobs gets the name recognition because he's an egomaniac and extended it far beyond reality to his and others' detriment.

     

    I don't think I'd like people to worship either of them. It's just plain bad. If we can ever dissuade people from that attitude, I don't think we have to compromise on them only worshiping one shit head :p That is of course, a big if.

     

    I don't hate Musk either. I'd rather he existed than not. Same goes for Jobs. Hate is a pretty strong word and it takes a lot to get into that category for me. Nevertheless, I've come to dislike him as a person the more I learned about him and I find the worship of him gross.

     

    Eh. I dunno if I fully agree. I think a lot of people had the same ideas he had, they where just more realistic about when it would be possible. It's why the Apple III was such a disaster. I think plenty of people knew the future of computers should be silent, they also just knew that the technology to make that happen wasn't here yet. I think he was good at seeing what was a good idea, the problem there though, was almost all those ideas where something someone else came up with. He just took the idea and marketed it better.

     

    Yeah I fully agree. I think a certain level of worship can be okay at some points though. Not to the extent either of them are, but enough to keep people motivated to do what they do. If tomorrow everyone forgot all about who Musk is, I think he would also stop trying spur of the moment things (like that submarine) that could maybe help someone. If you are motivated by ego (like most of these people are), will you keep trying to be known as the person who saved the universe when people stop worshipping you for trying to save the universe? And I fully agree. I think the people doing the real work deserve much more recognition. They are the ones making it really happen.

     

    Yeah, can't say I'm really against feeling that way.

×
×
  • Create New...