Jump to content

Massdriver

Members
  • Posts

    8,069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Massdriver

  1. 4 hours ago, CayceG said:

     

    Providing Abrams tanks, F-16s, long range missiles, etc won't increase the risks of nuclear war. This is what Sullivan thinks (and that's all that matters) but the strike on the long range anti-ICBM radar actually DOES increase the risk. 

     

    The increase in risk doesn't come from Russia wanting to respond and escalate. The risk is in that Russia needs to know that missiles aren't coming from Turkey (a NATO country and base for American nukes) and losing that radar means they can't be sure. At a time when dialogue between the US and Russia is almost nil and relations are nearly hostile, Russia is more likely to doubt messaging and rely on what they can see. If they can't see... That's a risk. 

     

     

    Ukraine should be given free reign to attack what they need to for success here, but that should exclude the nuclear early warning network at a minimum. 

     

     I disagree with Sullivan. I strongly agree with you and others here that striking anti-ICBM radar increases the risk. I haven't read why Ukraine struck this target, but it doesn't take an in depth study to understand why this is risky and bad for Ukraine.

  2. I am all for helping Ukraine. I think there is justified concern though that escalating the conflict with Russia increases the probability of a nuclear exchange. The chances aren’t high, but any increase at all is concerning. I imagine there is some middle ground here that allows Ukraine to strike more targets in Russia with our weapons without increasing it much. 

  3. 22 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

     

    The party leadership has taken a pretty drastic turn towards trumpism since the 2020 election.  But it sounds like many/most of the party members are having none of it.

    Right, with the Mises caucus. I think it’s that in many ways, they are further right than Trump, but in other ways are still libertarian. There’s that no compromise attitude the LP has always had too which will refuse to see Trump or Kennedy as one of them. 

  4. I'm a few episodes into season 3. That was a great first episode. I think I stood up a couple of times.

     

    This show has really high production values and isn't afraid to lean into some major character development and build it up brick by brick and then destroy it with some heavy weighted stuff. I'm enjoying how they're using the time jumps between seasons.

     

    Danny is kind of freaking me out though. When that song was playing at the wedding :sick:

    • Hype 1
×
×
  • Create New...