Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Author Share Posted September 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, CayceG said: The Nazi guard chose to be a Nazi and a guard. No one chooses to be a woman or black and get harassed for who they are and something they can't change. Plenty of Nazis were Germans who went along with it because that's what everyone else was doing/didn't want to stand out and didn't start out having hardons for gassing people. Originally the concentration camps were just run of the mill political prisoner camps. Then you got the really brutal concentration camps. Then you got the outright extermination camps--the Nazis had to warp themselves over time to be comfortable getting to the point of extermination camps. Meanwhile SHS went in eyes wide open about what she was getting into. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Author Share Posted September 4, 2020 LOL, she's still covering for him, clearly she was SUPER bothered by what happened with Kim Jong-Un. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Author Share Posted September 4, 2020 Also it's SHS so there's even odds she lied about the take one for the team comment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 What's the tldr of the Atlantic story? I've reached my free article limit for the month there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 36 minutes ago, Jason said: LOL, she's still covering for him, clearly she was SUPER bothered by what happened with Kim Jong-Un. Yeah but don't you have some sympathy for her? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastlevaniaNut18 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 6 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said: What's the tldr of the Atlantic story? I've reached my free article limit for the month there. Trump called soldiers who died in war losers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, CastlevaniaNut18 said: Trump called soldiers who died in war losers. Weird. This is common knowledge. I mean he was blasting McCain his entire primary for getting captured. Calling him a loser and all that. That's just one step away from calling dead service people losers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Author Share Posted September 4, 2020 This is essentially the same statement as "I prefer people who didn't get caught." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastlevaniaNut18 Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 minute ago, GeneticBlueprint said: Weird. This is common knowledge. I mean he was blasting McCain his entire primary for getting captured. Calling him a loser and all that. That's just one step away from calling dead service people losers. Exactly. It almost seems strange how they’re rushing to deny it so strongly. It’s about on par with comments he’s always made. McCain, the Khans, his Vietnam dodging, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillzdadirecta Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Jason said: LOL, she's still covering for him, clearly she was SUPER bothered by what happened with Kim Jong-Un. This is her trying to cover her ass for the Kim Jong Un thing in her book. She's PRAYING this is enough... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 4, 2020 Author Share Posted September 4, 2020 29 minutes ago, skillzdadirecta said: This is her trying to cover her ass for the Kim Jong Un thing in her book. She's PRAYING this is enough... We shouldn't be joking though this is obviously exactly the same thing as a battered wife cowering before her husband begging him not to hit her over burning the roast. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathema- Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 3 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said: What's the tldr of the Atlantic story? I've reached my free article limit for the month there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 5 hours ago, Jason said: LOL, she's still covering for him, clearly she was SUPER bothered by what happened with Kim Jong-Un. Aren't we glad we sympathized for a fraud who's trying to make money off a book right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 13 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: Aren't we glad we sympathized for a fraud who's trying to make money off a book right now? She should be able to live a peaceful life, free of harassment and be able to lie to people and make money. Wouldn't you feel better that way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Anathema- said: It was clearly a rhetorical question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ort Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 I hate stories like this, because it's 100% non verifiable, and even though it's probably true, at the end of the day its just doesn't matter. It's just noise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarSolo Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 Guys, I’m beginning to think this Kim story is fake considering how the administration HASN’T denied it yet. That, or they think it actually paints Trump in a good light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 7, 2020 Author Share Posted September 7, 2020 On 9/4/2020 at 3:34 AM, SaysWho? said: Aren't we glad we sympathized for a fraud who's trying to make money off a book right now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaysWho? Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Sarah Sanders uses false claim (AKA: she lied) to defend Trump after saying her account is actually truthful. Quote Sanders said in the interview and in a separate video posted to social media that she was in the room while Trump “let a parent know that their son had been killed” — a verbatim talking point from both..... Sanders added in the ABC interview, “At no time, other than that moment, have I seen the president show his heart more, show his vulnerability more than in that time.” Quote The news of a death is never delivered on the phone. Each branch of the military has its own protocols for notifying next of kin, but all require a field grade officer of equal or higher grade than the member whose death they are notifying to do so in person. A chaplain or medical personnel is also expected to attend, in person, if possible, but notification is expected to be completed within eight hours of learning about the casualty. Ms. Sanders said in a text message on Tuesday that the calls she was referring to in the video were condolence calls, not notification calls. Quote The problem with what Sanders said is not so much how she got it wrong — though that’s still bad — but in how she held it up as evidence of Trump’s support of the military. If the president is such a big backer of troops and sympathetic to the war dead — which was called into question by the Atlantic’s report last week and by subsequent confirmations of Trump’s alleged comments — why the need to exaggerate on this particular point? And that goes double for an interview in which Sanders was pitching herself as the “honest” arbiter of what transpired behind closed doors in the White House. It’s also particularly remarkable that this came from Sanders, who served as White House press secretary. The best spokespeople will take the truth and massage it in a direction that is favorable to their boss. Sanders went way beyond that — and in a manner that was rather immediately obvious to people who understand how military deaths are handled. It certainly raises the question: To the extent that Sanders is vouching for Trump’s stance on dead soldiers, how much does she really know? If she truly thinks Trump was informing military families of these deaths, was she actually paying attention? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 9, 2020 Author Share Posted September 9, 2020 2 hours ago, SaysWho? said: Sarah Sanders uses false claim (AKA: she lied) to defend Trump after saying her account is actually truthful. oO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillzdadirecta Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 5 hours ago, SaysWho? said: Sarah Sanders uses false claim (AKA: she lied) to defend Trump after saying her account is actually truthful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.