Jump to content
SaysWho?

~*Official 2020 Candidates Thread*~

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheGreatGamble said:

You keep ignoring the fact that I've told you multiple times that I KNOW THERE IS NO EXPECTATION OF FREE SPEECH ON TWITTER. You are either trolling, or refusing to read what I wrote. I think it should be regulated BECAUSE ITS SO IMPORTANT TO OUR DEMOCRACY. 

Uh huh. You said I believe in restricted free speech. That runs contrary to understanding that you don't have a right to a megaphone. You think they should be untouched and allowed to amplify on a private platform. That came from you.

 

If you truly believe they should be broken up, that would put you in the "far left" and maybe you should listen to them more instead of "bOtH sIdEs." The far left is always called extreme until everyone ends up agreeing with them anyway. Moderate Democrats thought voting for the Iraq War with a frown on their faces would make then seem as patriotic as Republicans. Now you're just an idiot if you thought it was a good idea lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also going to add that what is moderate or extreme is either a media creation or the media going along with what comes out of a Republican's mouth. If you believe that the entire spectrum is tilted right in America, then you don't believe that the center is a true center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaysWho? said:

I'm also going to add that what is moderate or extreme is either a media creation or the media going along with what cones out of a Republican's mouth. If you believe that the entire spectrum is tilted right in America, then you don't believe that the center is a true center.

There is no center. Thats why I said we need a third party, one not based on ideology, one that uses science, research, and evidence to find out whats best for the country. The problem is that you guys expect those of us who don't agree with either to still choose a side. Hell, liberals are still blaming Libertarians for the loss of horrible candidates like Gore and Clinton, instead of themselves for running bad candidates. You actively campaign against a third party because you are afraid that liberals can't win if there are more than two. You are terrified to even allow libertarians to debate with the dems and GOP (and the pushback comes from the left). The two party system is broken on both sides. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TheGreatGamble said:

There is no center. Thats why I said we need a third party, one not based on ideology, one that uses science, research, and evidence to find out whats best for the country. The problem is that you guys expect those of us who don't agree with either to still choose a side. Hell, liberals are still blaming Libertarians for the loss of horrible candidates like Gore and Clinton, instead of themselves for running bad candidates. You actively campaign against a third party because you are afraid that liberals can't win if there are more than two. You are terrified to even allow libertarians to debate with the dems and GOP (and the pushback comes from the left). The two party system is broken on both sides. 

 

Science shows that if you have less guns in a country, less people die. So would you support removing the 2nd? Or does your loyalty to an ancient document overrule science?

 

That is why you can't have a party not based on ideology. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Hell , liberals are still blaming Libertarians for the loss of horrible candidates like Gore and Clinton,

I can't believe this statement was made with a straight face

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, TheGreatGamble said:

There is no center. Thats why I said we need a third party, one not based on ideology, one that uses science, research, and evidence to find out whats best for the country. The problem is that you guys expect those of us who don't agree with either to still choose a side. Hell, liberals are still blaming Libertarians for the loss of horrible candidates like Gore and Clinton, instead of themselves for running bad candidates. You actively campaign against a third party because you are afraid that liberals can't win if there are more than two. You are terrified to even allow libertarians to debate with the dems and GOP (and the pushback comes from the left). The two party system is broken on both sides. 

 

We have a "two party" system largely because of the consequences of our political system and means of voting. Although no actual political system in the real world is ever as simple as the mathematical models in which theory is developed, it's widely established that the effect of these systems producing two parties tends to happen in practice.

 

Given the knowledge we have at election time about the general population, voting for a third party is an objectively bad strategy. Since you're a proponent of science and (presumably) math, I urge to vote strategically and rationally, given the system and information we have. That means voting for the party of the two major ones that best upholds your interests.

 

Simultaneously, if you'd like us to break free of this system, I'd encourage you to explore and promote changes to our fundamental systems that are more compatible with a larger set of choices. If we can do that, then the rational choice at voting time might change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheGreatGamble said:

There is no center. Thats why I said we need a third party, one not based on ideology, one that uses science, research, and evidence to find out whats best for the country. The problem is that you guys expect those of us who don't agree with either to still choose a side. Hell, liberals are still blaming Libertarians for the loss of horrible candidates like Gore and Clinton, instead of themselves for running bad candidates. You actively campaign against a third party because you are afraid that liberals can't win if there are more than two. You are terrified to even allow libertarians to debate with the dems and GOP (and the pushback comes from the left). The two party system is broken on both sides. 

 

BoTh SiDeS

 

You called yourself a centrist. Now you say there's no center. At least we're making progress because you are not center. 

 

A major party with your ideology (which thinks Gabbard was developing a centrist platform lol) would be BoTh SiDeD even more because it's really terrible and doesn't make sense. There's nothing magical about third parties. They suck. Third parties debate in many smaller races and never make traction because nobody actually likes them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, PaladinSolo said:

A new challenger emerges!

 

 

 

Further proof that they should just build the wall out of Hillary since she's clearly COMPLETELY impossible to get over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuck, after reading the last couple of pages, I want to listen to Joe Rogan and many other people some of you crazies won’t listen too.  Holy shit, some of you have gone batshit insane.  Like, holy fuck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaysWho? said:

Laughing at not with

Fucking same! 

 

You need to to go back on vacation!  Take a break man.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I would listen to Joe Rogan... I’m not about to become alt-right.  

 

Joe Rogan, the gateway drug.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Boyle5150 said:

Fucking same! 

 

You need to to go back on vacation!  Take a break man.  

 

You're the one losing it right now. You're one of the most extreme, pedantic dudes and wanted Bernie to win and want to listen to Rogan. You have no place to say someone else is crazy, especially since if you disagree with me ITT specifically, you're probably an extremist and a bit dim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SaysWho? said:

 

You're the one losing it right now. You're one of the most extreme, pedantic dudes and wanted Bernie to win and want to listen to Rogan. You have no place to say someone else is crazy, especially since if you disagree with me ITT specifically, you're probably an extremist and a bit dim.

Wow!  Dude this is what I’m talking about. Look at you attacking me.  Fucking crazy!  What a time to be alive. 

 

Hey, I’ll still hug you at the end of the day, but man, calm down a bit. 

 

Also, Bernie would have won!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Boyle5150 said:

Wow!  Dude this is what I’m talking about. Look at you attacking me.  Fucking crazy!  What a time to be alive. 

 

Hey, I’ll still hug you at the end of the day, but man, calm down a bit. 

 

Also, Bernie would have won!

 

I'm calmly attacking you and I feel great. Just be less annoying, pedantic and dishonest and less people would be on your case.

 

That's the last I respond to you because you're not worth the effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

 

You're one of the most extreme, pedantic dudes and wanted Bernie to win and want to listen to Rogan.

This language specifically, is just crazy talk.  Fuck the hate and rage you are replying with right now is seriously crazy.  Dude, I love you man, but calm it down a little. Actually take a vacation when you’re on vacation.  Turn off the Social media for a couple days.  Connect with other humans and remember we are all just trying to figure this experiment out.

 

“YOU WANTED BERNIE TO WIN AND YOU WANT TO LISTEN TO JOE ROGAN”.   HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaysWho? said:

 

I'm calmly attacking you and I feel great. Just be less annoying, pedantic and dishonest and less people would be on your case.

 

That's the last I respond to you because you're not worth the effort.

I’m sorry 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

 

 

That's the last I respond to you because you're not worth the effort.

Don’t worry, I still think you are worth it. <3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jason said:

blink 182 wtf GIF

 

Three replies in a row. Too much shit loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the guest the JRE can be pretty fuckin entertaining. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, RedSoxFan9 said:

 

Or there's not a lot worth defending in the current capitalist setup. Nah, that requires introspection. Attack the Democrat!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...