Jump to content
SaysWho?

~*Official 2020 Candidates Thread*~

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said:

 

This deserves all the reactions but since I can't I won't give any.

 

Nobody thought it was worthy. I am a failure of a reaction baiter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/next-one-out-booker-memo-warns-he-may-not-be-in-2020-race-much-longer/ar-AAHDmoa?li=BBnbcA1

Quote

Sen. Cory Booker must raise nearly $2 million in the next 10 days or the presidential candidate has no "legitimate long-term path forward," according to a memo to staff from the campaign manager obtained by NBC News.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he drops out, then we have 10 candidates for the October debate and it'll be one debate instead of two smaller ones.

 

Hope he stays in just for that lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Candidates are going after the media and Congress about the latest scandal involving Trump, Ukraine and the whistleblower. 

 

When a Fox News reporter asked Biden about whether he talked to his son about whatever Trump is talking about.

 

 

Beto and Warren on Trump and impeachment and Congress' failure to act:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, SaysWho? said:

If he drops out, then we have 10 candidates for the October debate and it'll be one debate instead of two smaller ones.

 

Hope he stays in just for that lol

 Marianne Williamson and Tulsi Gabbard could still qualify for the next debate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Remarkableriots said:

 Marianne Williamson and Tulsi Gabbard could still qualify for the next debate.

SERIOUSLY?!?!?  OH COME ON!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SFLUFAN said:

SERIOUSLY?!?!?  OH COME ON!!!

 

Calm down girlfriend, flow with the good energy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SFLUFAN said:

SERIOUSLY?!?!?  OH COME ON!!!

 

 

Why not, she completely body bagged Harris that one time, maybe she can take down someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dodger said:

 

 

Why not, she completely body bagged Harris that one time, maybe she can take down someone else.

 

It's so freaking early! Gotta give the scrubs a chance. There will be plenty of Warren Biden Sanders debates after.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Jose said:

 

It's so freaking early! Gotta give the scrubs a chance. There will be plenty of Warren Biden Sanders debates after.

 

Biden is a total cornpop. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

So basically M4A polls badly when you lie about it and don't add context

 

What is Warren’s proposal to pay for M4A? Does she plan to pay for it somehow without raising taxes in some capacity?  I’m more familiar with Bernie’s plan.

 

Just curious as to how the third way’s poll is lying about/decontextualizing the policy. (seriously curious, not snarky curious)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanting to know how M4A will be paid for is just as fair as wanting to know how a GOP tax cut will be paid for.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Signifyin(g)Monkey said:

What is Warren’s proposal to pay for M4A? Does she plan to pay for it somehow without raising taxes in some capacity?  I’m more familiar with Bernie’s plan.

 

Just curious as to how the third way’s poll is lying about/decontextualizing the policy. (seriously curious, not snarky curious)

Warren's framing has always been you'll pay the same or less in taxes than you do in premiums. She just won't give the soundbite that she's for  increasing taxes. Bernie has been upfront about how to pay for it by raising taxes, and he's not afraid to say it, to his credit, but he also makes the same point. 

 

Leaving out this context is a lie by omission. It's like describing the ACA as the government forcing you to purchase health insurance, without giving the context of subsidies/expanded Medicaid/better coverage and protections etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mclumber1 said:

Wanting to know how M4A will be paid for is just as fair as wanting to know how a GOP tax cut will be paid for.  

 

Only that the money is already being spent in the US. This country already spends a whole ton more on healthcare than any other country on the planet. It just devotes a larger portion of that toward for-profit medical insurance and administration than other nations. This really shouldn't be hard to figure out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

Warren's framing has always been you'll pay the same or less in taxes than you do in premiums. She just won't give the soundbite that she's for  increasing taxes. Bernie has been upfront about how to pay for it by raising taxes, and he's not afraid to say it, to his credit, but he also makes the same point. 

 

Leaving out this context is a lie by omission. It's like describing the ACA as the government forcing you to purchase health insurance, without giving the context of subsidies/expanded Medicaid/better coverage and protections etc.

 

3 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said:

 

Only that the money is already being spent in the US. This country already spends a whole ton more on healthcare than any other country on the planet. It just devotes a larger portion of that toward for-profit medical insurance and administration than other nations. This really shouldn't be hard to figure out.

 

Which is why I don't think it's a lie of omission. Yes, technically your taxes will go up, but she's correctly assessing that the average voter is too stupid to process anything more than the soundbite of "I'm raising your taxes".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

:flag:

 

 

That's gonna make Feinstein real sad. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warren is on top in latest NH poll, she rose 19, Biden fell 9 and Sanders dropped 6 points from last poll in May, seems she's pulling from both Sanders and Biden. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, thewhyteboar said:

Next time she is up for reelection I hope Feinstein gets primaried out of a job.

She's getting pretty old, I'd be a shame if she didn't make it to her next election

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...