SaysWho? Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 Also, two of those "legitimately elected" Senators were appointed, not elected, but he's not that bright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 30 minutes ago, SaysWho? said: I hope we get rid of Rubio in 2022. I hope 54 legitimately elected democratic US senators cast 52 (let's be real) legitimate votes to expand the supreme, district, appeals, and circuit courts and be filled en masse by a legitimately elected president Biden's actually highly qualified nominees to these posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ort Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Any time one of these Senators try to speak from now until the end of time, the person they are speaking too should just put up their hand and say... "You are a snake tongued liar whose empty words carry no meaning. Nothing you say has any weight because you have no integrity and are a known brazen hypocrite who has no meaningful values. You believe in nothing. I have nothing to say to someone as morally craven as you are. Shut your god damned liar mouth or I will shut it for you." 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osxmatt Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 90% of white evangelicals say the Bible should sway US law. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaladinSolo Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, osxmatt said: 90% of white evangelicals say the Bible should sway US law. They don't call them yallqaeda and the talibangicals for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastlevaniaNut18 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 15 minutes ago, osxmatt said: 90% of white evangelicals say the Bible should sway US law. Ummm, duh?Have you ever been around evangelicals? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexy_shapiro Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 18 minutes ago, osxmatt said: 90% of white evangelicals say the Bible should sway US law. The other 10% are lying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodyHell Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 1 minute ago, sexy_shapiro said: The other 10% are lying. Nope. Some actuality believe the whole bible, which says to obey the law of the land as well as the laws of christ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexy_shapiro Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, BloodyHell said: Nope. Some actuality believe the whole bible, which says to obey the law of the land as well as the laws of christ. Literally nobody follows the whole Bible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CastlevaniaNut18 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Just now, sexy_shapiro said: Literally nobody follows the whole Bible. Seriously. They all just pick and choose because the entire thing is a contradictory mess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 14 minutes ago, BloodyHell said: Nope. Some actuality believe the whole bible, which says to obey the law of the land as well as the laws of christ. So they believe the goofy shit like no wearing clothing of mixed fibers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uaarkson Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 9 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Based Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 30 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Republicans do act like children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 45 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said: Republicans do act like children. I'd never let my child act as disrespectful as your average republican elected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 well yah she has to check with husband to see which one she is allowed to have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Heh. That joke has at least two layers. Pretty good for Andy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 The Son of Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Helped Trump Secure Loans at Deutsche Bank LAWANDCRIME.COM The son of former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy helped Donald Trump in 2005 secure nearly $700 million in loans to construct a skyscraper in Chicago, despite Trump’s reputation for defaulting on business loans, the New York Times reported on Tuesday evening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Jason said: The Son of Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Helped Trump Secure Loans at Deutsche Bank LAWANDCRIME.COM The son of former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy helped Donald Trump in 2005 secure nearly $700 million in loans to construct a skyscraper in Chicago, despite Trump’s reputation for defaulting on business loans, the New York Times reported on Tuesday evening. Was this not commonly known? This reporting has been out for ages Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted November 2, 2020 Share Posted November 2, 2020 http://news.bloomberglaw.com//public/favicon.ico Barrett Makes Supreme Court Argument Debut as Newest Justice NEWS.BLOOMBERGLAW.COM Justice Amy Coney Barrett made her Supreme Court debut Monday, less than a week after being sworn in as the newest member of the court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commodore D Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 On 10/12/2020 at 9:43 AM, b_m_b_m_b_m said: i can't believe they're going with this bullshit excuse of why she apparently won't repeal the ACA in a few weeks. Actually I can, but it's just so transparently stupid. You would think the democratic establishment would see this is as a blessing with coming (now here) election. Win the presidency, the house, the senate, have ACA overturned, introduce a new bill, more comprehensive, better for the people, that doesn't capitulate to the Republican. But that would mean they would need to have not only vision, but the stones to follow through on that vision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 17 minutes ago, Commodore D said: But that would mean they would need to have not only vision, but the stones to follow through on that vision. Whoa there now! Let's not get crazy here! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 3 hours ago, Commodore D said: You would think the democratic establishment would see this is as a blessing with coming (now here) election. Win the presidency, the house, the senate, have ACA overturned, introduce a new bill, more comprehensive, better for the people, that doesn't capitulate to the Republican. But that would mean they would need to have not only vision, but the stones to follow through on that vision. I mean, even in this world where the democratic establishment has a vision, without court reform it can all just be undone well after they are out of power! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commodore D Posted November 3, 2020 Share Posted November 3, 2020 6 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: I mean, even in this world where the democratic establishment has a vision, without court reform it can all just be undone well after they are out of power! True. but that doesn't stop the their opposition. Reason: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricofoley Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Pro-life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSpreader Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Not very Catholic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 They found someone even more ridiculously unqualified than Barret. http://www.tampabay.com//pf/favicon-128.png WWW.TAMPABAY.COM Quote The nomination of Washington, D.C., attorney Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, a 33-year-old Lakeland native, has made waves in the legal community. The American Bar Association sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee in September saying that, despite her credentials, Mizelle’s lack of trial experience renders her unqualified to be appointed to the federal judiciary. “It’s just unusual to have someone appointed who is that young,” said University of Richmond School of Law professor Carl Tobias, who studies the selection of federal judges. “When the ABA rates people, it likes to see 12 years of practical experience. Of course she doesn’t have that. But she has clerked for a number of well-respected federal judges.” Mizelle graduated from the University of Florida Levin College of Law in 2012. She has worked in the Department of Justice and clerked in the Middle District of Florida, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court. Quote She has never tried a criminal or civil case, even as co-counsel, since being admitted to the Bar eight years ago, according to a Sept. 8 letter written by Randall D. Noel, chairman of the association’s standing committee on the federal judiciary, to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remarkableriots Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Jason looking for a new job? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 Dems should consider it criminal if he doesn’t retire after the current SCOTUS term ends in the summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spork3245 Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 24 minutes ago, sblfilms said: Dems should consider it criminal if he doesn’t retire after the current SCOTUS term ends in the summer. "we shouldn't be confirming anyone to SCOTUS after such a contested presidential election" -Mitch McTurtle, probably (thankfully, he won't matter this time... unless it's after 2022 mid-terms ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 2 hours ago, Jason said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 That is the prevailing theory but given the "majority" in the senate I'm nervous (she'd be a good pick regardless from what I can gather) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.