Jason Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 Disney+ terms prevent allergy death lawsuit, Disney says WWW.BBC.COM The entertainment giant says the terms of a free trial prevent it from being sued for wrongful death. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chakoo Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 Yeah, this won't work. I get their lawyers just throwing this out there to try but it feels like this does more brand damage than it's worth. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 I wish they’d stop reporting and referring to arbitrators as neutral third parties, when so often they are not. They have a business arrangement with these companies. If they side against them they are risking a company like Disney not selecting them as an arbitrator ever again. That is not neutral. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentbob Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 They just got a lady on CNN and looked through the contract. She doesn’t think it’ll hold but it refers to the digital service of Disney+ and physical parks. Either way, that’s some evil corporate shit there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblfilms Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 It is funny that they spend the headline point being the D+ terms argument when the far more substantive issue is the terms you agree to by purchasing the theme park ticket and redeeming it at the gate upon entry. The media is trash 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzzzle Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 1 hour ago, sblfilms said: It is funny that they spend the headline point being the D+ terms argument when the far more substantive issue is the terms you agree to by purchasing the theme park ticket and redeeming it at the gate upon entry. The media is trash I kind of feel like the "by purchasing [x] you agree to never be able to sue us for anything" thing is going to end up in the supreme court soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 44 minutes ago, Fizzzzle said: I kind of feel like the "by purchasing [x] you agree to never be able to sue us for anything" thing is going to end up in the supreme court soon Rubber stamped by the Supreme Court imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzzzle Posted August 14 Share Posted August 14 59 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said: Rubber stamped by the Supreme Court imo I wouldn't be so sure. Roberts and Thomas are the only ones that suck corporate dick 100% of the time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b_m_b_m_b_m Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 1 hour ago, Fizzzzle said: I wouldn't be so sure. Roberts and Thomas are the only ones that suck corporate dick 100% of the time I’m sure a few tips to the justices would change minds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioandsonic Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 6 hours ago, Fizzzzle said: I kind of feel like the "by purchasing [x] you agree to never be able to sue us for anything" thing is going to end up in the supreme court soon Chevron case will make the SCOTUS go ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keyser_Soze Posted August 15 Share Posted August 15 10 hours ago, Fizzzzle said: I kind of feel like the "by purchasing [x] you agree to never be able to sue us for anything" thing is going to end up in the supreme court soon The supreme court of Finland? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.