CitizenVectron Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 It's either a clone of Yoda or they are trying to make a clone of his species. 50-years old is too old for it to have been made in or around the Clone Wars, so I hope it's the latter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternallDarkness Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 1 hour ago, CitizenVectron said: It's either a clone of Yoda or they are trying to make a clone of his species. 50-years old is too old for it to have been made in or around the Clone Wars, so I hope it's the latter. not saying it isn't a possibility but why does it have to be a clone? I could just be a child Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 16 hours ago, Greatoneshere said: It's a clone guys. Pershing and the guys guarding baby Yoda have planet Kamino cloning company insiginias. I mean, it's related to cloning, c'mon now. Lame, but I'll take it since the show is good. People can wear a company’s merch and not work for them. That means nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternallDarkness Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 3 hours ago, Spawn_of_Apathy said: People can wear a company’s merch and not work for them. That means nothing. while that is true for us, the odds are most definitely in favor of it being a clone. I just like to think the possibility of it being a real child. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneticBlueprint Posted November 17, 2019 Share Posted November 17, 2019 If it's a clone then why do the cloners want it? Would make more sense for them to want it in order to clone it instead of the inverse. Which would also make sense since they said bringing it back dead would be acceptable but not preferred. The cloners were also able to have clones grow and mature at an accelerated pace. So a 50 year old child doesn't make sense in that context either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternallDarkness Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, GeneticBlueprint said: If it's a clone then why do the cloners want it? Would make more sense for them to want it in order to clone it instead of the inverse. Which would also make sense since they said bringing it back dead would be acceptable but not preferred. The cloners were also able to have clones grow and mature at an accelerated pace. So a 50 year old child doesn't make sense in that context either. you make a good point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal-El814 Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 5 hours ago, GeneticBlueprint said: If it's a clone then why do the cloners want it? Would make more sense for them to want it in order to clone it instead of the inverse. Which would also make sense since they said bringing it back dead would be acceptable but not preferred. The cloners were also able to have clones grow and mature at an accelerated pace. So a 50 year old child doesn't make sense in that context either. Clones were ordered in 32 BBY. The Mandalorian takes place 9 ABY. Not impossible for that math to be “close enough” or for Sidious to have known about the Kaminoans and wanted a Yoda clone for himself. Who knows! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLeon Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 I’m not fully up on my lore, but have we ever seen a clone be as Force sensitive as baby Yoda? That could be why this clone (if that’s what it is) is significant. Or they just want to snuggle with the cutest thing in the galaxy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commissar SFLUFAN Posted November 18, 2019 Author Share Posted November 18, 2019 1 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 7 hours ago, TheLeon said: I’m not fully up on my lore, but have we ever seen a clone be as Force sensitive as baby Yoda? That could be why this clone (if that’s what it is) is significant. Or they just want to snuggle with the cutest thing in the galaxy. Not in cannon. In Legends there was at least the Starkiller clone featured in Force Unleased II. Very powerful with the force. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal-El814 Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 27 minutes ago, Spawn_of_Apathy said: Not in cannon. In Legends there was at least the Starkiller clone featured in Force Unleased II. Very powerful with the force. Also Luuke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 And in Legends Palpatine clones himself, so he could spiritually poses his own body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatoneshere Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 I grant that it may not be as straightforward as "baby Yoda clone" but the company insignias are certainly important and note worthy, is all I'm really getting at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbobo Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 I cannot believe there is not a baby yoda plush that I can buy my girlfriend for Christmas, this is the most un-Disney thing imaginable. I would have figured there would be container loads of these things ready to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris- Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, elbobo said: I cannot believe there is not a baby yoda plush that I can buy my girlfriend for Christmas, this is the most un-Disney thing imaginable. I would have figured there would be container loads of these things ready to go. I will be watching every episode without my girlfriend first solely so I don't have to hear, 'Awwwww' every ten goddamn seconds. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternallDarkness Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 1 hour ago, elbobo said: I cannot believe there is not a baby yoda plush that I can buy my girlfriend for Christmas, this is the most un-Disney thing imaginable. I would have figured there would be container loads of these things ready to go. Disney, for as much merchandising as it does, often screws the pooch. Back when Frozen came out you couldn't find an Olaf doll for like 4+ months. They way underestimated interest/demand. You couldn't find them in their store, at the park..nowhere. You'd think they'd have learned their lesson especially when they saw how crazy people went for baby Groot. Adorable sells. However, while it's not baby Yoda, Hallmark sells their itty bitty collection-tiny little plushes and yes they are actually called itty bitty ) and I know they have a Yoda. It's not baby Yoda but it's still cute. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacon Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 I signed up for the trial. There might not be lightsabers, but this is Star Wars. This is exactly what I love about the universe. This give me the same vibes SWTOR game when not playing a Jedi/Sith class. This is what I have wanted. At least, so far. It could change for the worse I suppose, but I have high hopes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblfilms Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 I’m pretty sure they didn’t want to spoil the Baby Yoda thing with merchandising leaks. They didn’t even screen the first episode for critics to avoid that leaking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatGamble Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 2:08 AM, TheLeon said: I’m not fully up on my lore, but have we ever seen a clone be as Force sensitive as baby Yoda? That could be why this clone (if that’s what it is) is significant. Or they just want to snuggle with the cutest thing in the galaxy. Yoda stated in the first episode of Clone Wars (maybe the second, the one where he fight's Ventress' droids) that the force is in all living things, including clones. He was specifically speaking to clones about the force being in them. I still don't believe the child is a clone. It is absolutely a Tridactyl that they want to clone. They wouldn't guard a clone so close, they would have many. And they would have accelerated his growth, like they do with all clones. IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatGamble Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 4:21 PM, Spawn_of_Apathy said: People can wear a company’s merch and not work for them. That means nothing. It really does mean something. People in star wars don't wear patches/uniforms they aren't associated with (except while infiltrating, such as in New Hope). They don't put those things there for no reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacon Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spawn_of_Apathy Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 On 11/18/2019 at 7:14 AM, SFLUFAN said: I can’t tell you how much I love this. Just brightens up my day. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Pickle Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 9 hours ago, sblfilms said: I’m pretty sure they didn’t want to spoil the Baby Yoda thing with merchandising leaks. They didn’t even screen the first episode for critics to avoid that leaking. I think Disney should invest in a secret factory on the moon to minimize spoilers . And of course convert it into a Death Star in 100 year 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatoneshere Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 13 hours ago, elbobo said: I cannot believe there is not a baby yoda plush that I can buy my girlfriend for Christmas, this is the most un-Disney thing imaginable. I would have figured there would be container loads of these things ready to go. 13 hours ago, Chris- said: I will be watching every episode without my girlfriend first solely so I don't have to hear, 'Awwwww' every ten goddamn seconds. I am having the same problem. My wife literally just won't stop. I get it, it's cute. It is! But Jesus Christ. I told her I'm pretty convinced the show has baby Yoda to entice a female audience that probably doesn't care about this show as much as older male Star Wars fans do otherwise. Women all over have already meme'd this damn baby Yoda thing to death. Yet every episode, my wife can't get over it. I think Pixar has had cuter things so I don't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal-El814 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Greatoneshere said: I think Pixar has had cuter things so I don't get it. Well you’re wrong about Pixar having cuter things, so I agree that you don’t get it. Baby Yoda is life. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatoneshere Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 Just now, Kal-El814 said: Well you’re wrong about Pixar having cuter things, so I agree that you don’t get it. Baby Yoda is life. Baby Dory is pretty adorable . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal-El814 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Greatoneshere said: Baby Dory is pretty adorable . . . Baby Yoda’s full diaper is more adorable, please. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbobo Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 baby yoda is straight up weaponized cuteness 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 3 hours ago, Greatoneshere said: Baby Dory is pretty adorable . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 I think it helps that Baby Yoda is a real puppet. CGI is really good now, but we can still subconsciously (if not consciously) tell it is not real most of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cusideabelincoln Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said: I think it helps that Baby Yoda is a real puppet. CGI is really good now, but we can still subconsciously (if not consciously) tell it is not real most of the time. It's gotta be a puppet with CGI because I thought it was all really good CGI for sure. 11 hours ago, TheGreatGamble said: Yoda stated in the first episode of Clone Wars (maybe the second, the one where he fight's Ventress' droids) that the force is in all living things, including clones. He was specifically speaking to clones about the force being in them. I still don't believe the child is a clone. It is absolutely a Tridactyl that they want to clone. They wouldn't guard a clone so close, they would have many. And they would have accelerated his growth, like they do with all clones. IMO. And even if it was a clone of Yoda, Midichlorians are a "separate" organism so Yoda's Midichlorians wouldn't necessarily be cloned in the process. Unless, of course, the cloners can do that too, which would mean they can create Midichlorians on demand. Talk about upsetting the balance of the Force if that were true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternallDarkness Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 someone needs to make a meme that has Jake (Anikan) asking ...what are midichlorians and Qui-Gon answering the stupidest thing ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firewithin Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenVectron Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 2 hours ago, cusideabelincoln said: It's gotta be a puppet with CGI because I thought it was all really good CGI for sure. And even if it was a clone of Yoda, Midichlorians are a "separate" organism so Yoda's Midichlorians wouldn't necessarily be cloned in the process. Unless, of course, the cloners can do that too, which would mean they can create Midichlorians on demand. Talk about upsetting the balance of the Force if that were true... From what I understand it is entirely physical with the exception of some animation they do for the irises. Two people operate the puppet remotely: one for eyes and mouth, the other for ears and body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Pickle Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 46 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said: From what I understand it is entirely physical with the exception of some animation they do for the irises. Two people operate the puppet remotely: one for eyes and mouth, the other for ears and body. YAAAAAAAS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.